Two vehicles collided at an impact speed in excess of 160 m.p.h. All three occupants of one car sustained a perineal injury. We believe that the injuries were caused by the plastic boxes in which cassette tapes are stored. Case reports Patient IA 22-year-old woman was retrieved unconscious from the car. She had sustained both a serious head injury and a perineal injury. She had a large perineal haematoma with a central laceration without rectal or vaginal involvement. This injury was managed conservatively and healed without incident. Putimr 2A 24-year-old man was rescued from the back seat of the car. He had originally been sitting in the front passenger seat wearing a seatbelt. His injuries included a right-sided pneumothorax and a stable undisplaced crush fracture of the third lumbar vertebra.He had also sustained a major perineal injury involving the anus. After resuscitation, formal examination under anaesthesia revealed a complete disruption of the internal and external anal sphincters with the wound extending anterolaterally into the perineum. There was a minor split posteriorly. The injury was deep and extended to the ischial tuberosity on the right side.Primary repair of the sphincter was effected with interrupted mattress sutures of chromic catgut (Figure 1 ). The remaining perineal defect was packed with flavine gauze, and faecal diversion was achieved with a defunctioning left iliac fossa loop colostomy. Ten days after the initial injury, rectal examination revealed voluntary anal sphincter contraction. The patient was discharged from hospital to undergo a formal test of anal function 3 months later and closure of colostomy thereafter provjded continence is satisfactory. Putient 3The driver of the vehicle, a 25-year-old man, was found to have sustained severe lacerations, a fracture dislocation of the left hip and a right olecranon fracture. He had also sustained an injury to the perineum giving severe contusion to the base of the penis without laceration. The latter injury required no intervention. DiscussionThe original theory as to the cause of these unusual injuries was that the seat springs had been forced through the seat covers into the perineum of the occupants of the car. However, Figure 1 Anal sphincter disruption after repair in patient 2 a detailed police inspection showed that the seats had not been damaged in this way. The car did, however, contain many fragments of plastic derived from the covers of cassette tape boxes. The fire officer who extracted patient 2 from the car then reported that he had removed an arrow-shaped piece of plastic from the perineal wound of this patient.When these plastic fragments are examined it becomes apparent that they are capable of causing incised wounds, and we suggest that they were indeed the cause of the three perineal injuries sustained in this accident. A literature search and inquiries of the Police Transport and Road Research Laboratories have not revealed reports of any other similar injuries. Beard et al.' reported six severe pelvic injuries ass...
Role of sequential leucocyte counts and C-reactive protein measurements in acute appendicitis Sir We read with interest the paper by Mr Thompson and colleagues (Br J Surg 1992; 79: 822-4) describing the use of serial leucocyte counts as an adjunct to clinical assessment in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The test described (that ofan increasein the total leucocyte count over a 4-h period) was shown to have a sensitivity of 92 per cent and a specificity of 100 per cent and was therefore claimed to fulfil the criteria for a diagnostic test that could prove useful in assessing patients with equivocal clinical findings.Of more practical relevance, however, is the negative predictive value of the test, the proportion of patients with a negative test result who did not have appendicitis. Although it is not quoted in the text, we calculate this value to be only 78 per cent. Furthermore, as the authors mention, those false-negative results (patients incorrectly predicted not to have appendicitis) were in cases of a perforated appendix and thus represent the very patients one would not wish to miss. Although a rising leucocyte count may be useful in certain cases, we would advocate extreme caution before refuting the diagnosis of acute appendicitis on the basis of this test.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.