No abstract

No abstract

Background Palliative oxygen therapy is widely used for dyspnea in individuals with life-limiting illness ineligible for long-term oxygen therapy. Methods This international double-blind randomized controlled trial evaluatedeffectiveness of oxygen vs. medical (room) air for relieving breathlessness in patients with life-limiting illness, refractory dyspnea, and PaO2>55 mm Hg. Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics at 9 sites (Australia, United States, England). Participants received oxygen or medical air via concentrator through nasal cannulae at 2 liters/minute for 7 days. The primary outcome measure was breathlessness (0-10 numerical rating scale [NRS]), measured twice daily. Findings Participants (N=239) were: mean age, 73 (standard deviation [SD] 10); 62% male; mean PaO2, 77 mm Hg (SD 12); mean morning dyspnea, 4.5 on NRS (SD 2.2); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 64%; cancer, 16%. Oxygen was not significantly superior to medical air for relief of breathlessness. Over the 7-day period, after provision of medical gas, mean morning and evening dyspnea decreased by -0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.1, -0.5) and -0.4 (CI: -0.7, 0.1), respectively (p<0.001), regardless of intervention. Baseline dyspnea predicted improvement with medical gas; participants with moderate (4-6 NRS) and severe (7-10 NRS) baseline dyspnea had average decreases in morning dyspnea of -0.7 (CI: -1.1, -0.4) and -2.4 (CI: -3.0, -1.8), respectively. Interpretation There is no additional symptomatic benefit of oxygen over room air delivered by nasal cannulae for relieving refractory dyspnea related to life-limiting illness in patients with PaO2>55 mm Hg. Dyspnea intensity decreased in both study arms, temporally related to provision of medical gas.

@ERSpublicationsFor patients with COVID-19, there is a moral obligation to provide good supportive care to prevent avoidable suffering. This article provides a succinct informative overview, clinical guidance and information sheets for both patients and families. https://bit.ly/2UPFsOj Cite this article as: Bajwah S, Wilcock A, Towers R, et al. Managing the supportive care needs of those affected by COVID-19. Eur Respir J 2020; 55: 2000815 [https://doi.

Background This review is an update of a previously published review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 1, 2013 on Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease. Patients with advanced progressive disease often experience muscle weakness, which can impact adversely on their ability to be independent and their quality of life. In those patients who are unable or unwilling to undertake whole-body exercise, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be an alternative treatment to enhance lower limb muscle strength. Programmes of NMES appear to be acceptable to patients and have led to improvements in muscle function, exercise capacity, and quality of life. However, estimates regarding the effectiveness of NMES based on individual studies lack power and precision. Objectives Primary objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of NMES on quadriceps muscle strength in adults with advanced disease. Secondary objectives: to examine the safety and acceptability of NMES, and its effect on peripheral muscle function (strength or endurance), muscle mass, exercise capacity, breathlessness, and health-related quality of life. Search methods We identified studies from searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (OVID), Embase (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), and PsycINFO (OVID) databases to January 2016; citation searches, conference proceedings, and previous systematic reviews. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials in adults with advanced chronic respiratory disease, chronic heart failure, cancer, or HIV/ AIDS comparing a programme of NMES as a sole or adjunct intervention to no treatment, placebo NMES, or an active control. We imposed no language restriction.