Government statistics and empirical research have long documented the fact that Aboriginal people account for a much higher proportion of Canada's inmate population than would be expected by looking at their relative proportion in the general population. In spite of this increasing focus on overrepresentation, there has been little documented change in Aboriginal incarceration rates. Section 718.2(e) was added to the Criminal Code to encourage judicial consideration of alternatives to incarceration, with particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal offenders. To evaluate the impact of section 718.2(e), the current study examined 691 randomly sampled sentencing decisions from the Quicklaw database to determine the extent to which Aboriginal status was correlated with judges’ sentencing decisions relative to other legally relevant factors that have traditionally guided sentencing. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses indicated that Aboriginal status did not significantly predict the likelihood of receiving a custodial or non-custodial disposition relative to aggravating and mitigating factors or sentencing objectives cited by judges. Rather, several aggravating and mitigating factors cited by judges, including offence seriousness, prior criminal history, and the plea of the offender were significantly related to sentencing decisions.
The slasher horror film has been deplored based on claims that it depicts eroticized violence against predominately female characters as punishment for sexual activities. To test this assertion, a quantitative content analysis was conducted to examine the extent to which gender differences are evident in the association between character survival and engagement in sexual activities. Information pertaining to gender, engagement in sexual activities, and survival was coded for film characters from a simple random sample of 50 English-language, North American slasher films released between 1960 and 2009. Results indicated that sexual female characters were less likely to survive and had significantly longer death scenes as compared to those female characters who did not engage in sexual behaviors.
Films as a cultural medium both reflect dominant attitudes in society and also play a pivotal role in the shaping of our perceptions and ideas. Within popular culture, crime has long been a popular theme, particularly for contemporary film-makers. While a substantial and growing body of research exists on the portrayal of crimes and criminals in the literature, few efforts have been made to conduct a systematic analytical study of the construction of justice in film. As such, the general purpose of this article was to identify pervasive themes inherent in the portrayals of crime and justice across a wide spectrum of films. We examined the connections drawn between the narratives of justice that emerge in some films and the manners in which crime and criminality are constructed. Our analysis draws upon the social constructionist literature in deciphering the meanings and messages which are conveyed through films on the themes of justice.
The expansion of online social networking sites and the relative accessibility to personal information provided by these sites has raised concerns about the risks for a variety of negative experiences, including cyberstalking. The present study investigated whether the theoretical concepts of Routine Activities Theory (RAT) could account for patterns of cyberstalking victimization among social networking site users. The study employed a self-report survey design using a convenience sample of 321 female undergraduate students. RAT was operationalized in the cyber context by measuring the level of online disclosure, frequency of internet use (online exposure) and general proclivity for risk-taking behaviours among participants. Personal experiences of cyberstalking were also assessed. Analyses specifically examined the relationship between RAT variables and cyberstalking outcomes and the extent to which a specific form of guardianship, online disclosiveness, served as a mediator between online activities and the risk for victimization. Online exposure and a proclivity for social risk-taking were associated with cyberstalking victimization. Levels of online disclosure demonstrated a direct positive impact on cyberstalking victimization, however our findings elucidating the role of online disclosure as a guardianship effort mediating the effects of exposure on cyberstalking victimization were mixed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.