This study used a relative risk (RR) regression method to explore the extent to which children of caregivers in the Brevard C.A.R.E.S. (Coordination, Advocacy, Resources, Education and Support) wraparound intervention experienced a reduction of maltreatment 6 months post completion. Brevard C.A.R.E.S. is a wraparound intervention designed to reduce and prevent child maltreatment in identified at-risk families of children 0-17 years old. The study of 308 children included 131 whose caregivers completed the intervention and a comparison group of 177 similarly situated children. The study found that children whose caregivers completed the intervention experienced less verified maltreatment than children in the comparison group. These findings have implications to enhance systems of care in the community that seek family interventions to support child maltreatment prevention. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE • This intervention actively engages a family in identifying and owning its strengths, natural supports, and vision of family success, while facilitating a Family Conferencing Team to move toward that vision. Note. This chart was developed by the staff of Brevard C.A.R.E.S. after receiving training in the National Wraparound Initiative's guiding principles (Bruns et al., 2008).
This paper recognizes the intergenerational conflicts that can emerge as older and younger persons compete for scarce resources. It then proposes that intergenerational relationships can not only promote intergenerational solidarity but also they may mitigate against five beliefs or "dangerous ideas" proposed by Roy and Judith Eidelson that lead to global violence and conflict: superiority, injustice, vulnerability, distrust, and helplessness. A rationale for how intergenerational relationships provide the individual, developmental grounding for shaping empowering beliefs and resultant positive and productive actions is offered. Specific ways these beliefs counter the formation of dangerous ideas are described. In that creating "global citizens" is an ultimate goal, examples from around the world of creative ways younger and older persons have collaborated to address serious social problems end the piece.
Youth Thrive Origins and Framework Helping youth realize their dreams while also keeping them safe and attending to their physical and emotional needs is the goal for all parents. Balancing dreams and needs also defines the role of those working with youth in the child welfare system. In 2011, the Center for the Study of Social Policy (CSSP) began an effort to reverse the troubling outcomes that many young people in the foster care system experience (Courtney, 2009) and to capitalize on the inherent strengths that exist in these youth. CSSP is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to improving life chances for our country's most vulnerable children, youth, and families and has a long history of working with child welfare systems to produce better results. CSSP's interest in creating a youth development agenda coincided with several other important changes: breakthroughs in the field of adolescent brain development, the passage of the federal Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act 1 in 2008, and the federal call for child welfare agencies to elevate their focus on child and youth well-being, in addition to safety and permanency. Recently there has also been a growing belief in communities and among child welfare and youth services experts as to the value of practitioners dealing with both risk factors that compromise a child's life prospects (e.g., family violence) and protective and promotive factors (e.g., resilience, social connections) that minimize risk and advance well-being (Epstein, 2004). By drawing attention to the importance of balancing attention to risk reduction with that of the promotion of health, the Youth Thrive Framework is consistent with the tenets
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.