Early warning scores are predictive of severe adverse events in postoperative patients. eCART is significantly more accurate in this patient population than both NEWS and MEWS.
Background
ECMO is an established supportive adjunct for patients with severe, refractory ARDS from viral pneumonia. However, the exact role and timing of ECMO for COVID-19 patients remains unclear.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective comparison of the first 32 patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS to the last 28 patients with influenza-associated ARDS placed on V-V ECMO. We compared patient factors between the two cohorts and used survival analysis to compare the hazard of mortality over sixty days post-cannulation.
Results
COVID-19 patients were older (mean 47.8 vs. 41.2 years, p = 0.033), had more ventilator days before cannulation (mean 4.5 vs. 1.5 days, p < 0.001). Crude in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the COVID-19 cohort at 65.6% (n = 21/32) versus 36.3% (n = 11/28, p = 0.041). The adjusted hazard ratio over sixty days for COVID-19 patients was 2.81 (95% CI 1.07, 7.35) after adjusting for age, race, ECMO-associated organ failure, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Conclusion
ECMO has a role in severe ARDS associated with COVID-19 but providers should carefully weigh patient factors when utilizing this scarce resource in favor of influenza pneumonia.
Background
Critical illness from COVID-19 is associated with prolonged hospitalization and high mortality rates. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used for refractory severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19 with outcomes comparable to other indications for ECMO. However, long-term functional outcomes have yet to be fully elucidated.
Methods
We performed a retrospective chart review of 24 consecutive patients who required ECMO due to COVID-19 associated severe ARDS and survived to hospital discharge. After hospitalization, we contacted patients and administered the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 tool to assess longer-term outcomes. We abstracted demographics, clinical course, outcomes, and disposition variables from the electronic medical record. Descriptive statistical analysis was used on the retrospective data collection.
Results
Inpatient data were analyzed for 24 patients and 21/24 (88%) patients completed the PROMIS tool at an average of 8.8 months post-hospitalization. At hospital discharge, 62.5% of patients had ongoing oxygen requirements (nasal cannula, trach collar, or mechanical ventilation). 70.8% were discharged to a location other than home. However, at the time of follow-up, only 9.5% of patients required supplemental oxygen, all tracheostomies had been removed, and all patients resided at home. Patients reported relatively high levels of global physical function and though there was a high reported incidence of fatigue, overall pain scores were low.
Conclusions
Long-term outcomes after ECMO for severe ARDS from COVID-19 are promising. ECMO therapy may confer morbidity benefits in COVID patients and remains a valuable modality with excellent functional outcomes and preserved quality of life for survivors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.