Genetic information encoded in messenger RNA is translated into protein by the ribosome, which is a large nucleoprotein complex comprising two subunits, denoted 30S and 50S in bacteria. Here we report the crystal structure of the 30S subunit from Thermus thermophilus, refined to 3 A resolution. The final atomic model rationalizes over four decades of biochemical data on the ribosome, and provides a wealth of information about RNA and protein structure, protein-RNA interactions and ribosome assembly. It is also a structural basis for analysis of the functions of the 30S subunit, such as decoding, and for understanding the action of antibiotics. The structure will facilitate the interpretation in molecular terms of lower resolution structural data on several functional states of the ribosome from electron microscopy and crystallography.

The 30S ribosomal subunit has two primary functions in protein synthesis. It discriminates against aminoacyl transfer RNAs that do not match the codon of messenger RNA, thereby ensuring accuracy in translation of the genetic message in a process called decoding. Also, it works with the 50S subunit to move the tRNAs and associated mRNA by precisely one codon, in a process called translocation. Here we describe the functional implications of the high-resolution 30S crystal structure presented in the accompanying paper, and infer details of the interactions between the 30S subunit and its tRNA and mRNA ligands. We also describe the crystal structure of the 30S subunit complexed with the antibiotics paromomycin, streptomycin and spectinomycin, which interfere with decoding and translocation. This work reveals the structural basis for the action of these antibiotics, and leads to a model for the role of the universally conserved 16S RNA residues A1492 and A1493 in the decoding process.

Crystal structures of the 30S ribosomal subunit in complex with messenger RNA and cognate transfer RNA in the A site, both in the presence and absence of the antibiotic paromomycin, have been solved at between 3.1 and 3.3 angstroms resolution. Cognate transfer RNA (tRNA) binding induces global domain movements of the 30S subunit and changes in the conformation of the universally conserved and essential bases A1492, A1493, and G530 of 16S RNA. These bases interact intimately with the minor groove of the first two base pairs between the codon and anticodon, thus sensing Watson-Crick base-pairing geometry and discriminating against near-cognate tRNA. The third, or "wobble," position of the codon is free to accommodate certain noncanonical base pairs. By partially inducing these structural changes, paromomycin facilitates binding of near-cognate tRNAs.During protein synthesis, the ribosome catalyzes the sequential addition of amino acids to a growing polypeptide chain, using mRNA as a template and aminoacylated tRNAs (aatRNAs) as substrates. Correct base pairing between the three bases of the codon on mRNA and those of the anticodon of the cognate aatRNA dictates the sequence of the polypeptide chain. Discrimination against noncognate tRNA, which generally has two or three mismatches in the base pairing, can be accounted for by the difference in the free energy of base pairing to the codon compared with cognate tRNA. For near-cognate tRNA, which usually involves a single mismatch, the free-energy difference in base pairing compared with cognate tRNA would predict an error rate that is one to two orders of magnitude higher than the actual error rate of protein synthesis (1), and it has long been recognized that the ribosome must improve the accuracy of protein synthesis by discriminating against near-cognate tRNAs (2). This discrimination involves the 30S subunit, which binds mRNA and the anticodon stem-loop (ASL) of tRNA.At the beginning of the elongation cycle, which involves the addition of a new amino acid to a growing polypeptide chain, the aatRNA is presented to the ribosome as a ternary complex with elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and guanosine triphosphate (GTP). The selection of cognate tRNA is believed to occur in two stages-an initial recognition step and a proofreading step-that are separated by the irreversible hydrolysis of GTP by EF-Tu (3-6). In this scheme, the discrimination energy inherent in codon-anticodon base pairing is exploited twice to achieve the necessary accuracy. Recent experiments suggest that the binding of cognate rather than near-cognate tRNA results in higher rates of both GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu, and accommodation, a process in which the acceptor arm of the aa-tRNA swings into the peptidyl transferase site after its release from EF-Tu (7,8). In both steps, the higher rate is proposed to be the result of structural changes in the ribosome induced by cognate tRNA. In the context of proofreading mechanisms alone, it is unclear whether additional structural discrimination by the ribosome, ...

Cytoplasmic dynein, the 1.2 MDa motor driving minus-end-directed motility, has been reported to move processively along microtubules, but its mechanism of motility remains poorly understood. Here, using S. cerevisiae to produce recombinant dynein with a chemically controlled dimerization switch, we show by structural and single-molecule analysis that processivity requires two dynein motor domains but not dynein's tail domain or any associated subunits. Dynein advances most frequently in 8 nm steps, although longer as well as side and backward steps are observed. Individual motor domains show a different stepping pattern, which is best explained by the two motor domains shuffling in an alternating manner between rear and forward positions. Our results suggest that cytoplasmic dynein moves processively through the coordination of its two motor domains, but its variable step size and direction suggest a considerable diffusional component to its step, which differs from Kinesin-1 and is more akin to myosin VI.

We have used the recently determined atomic structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit to determine the structures of its complexes with the antibiotics tetracycline, pactamycin, and hygromycin B. The antibiotics bind to discrete sites on the 30S subunit in a manner consistent with much but not all biochemical data. For each of these antibiotics, interactions with the 30S subunit suggest a mechanism for its effects on ribosome function.

Dynactin is an essential cofactor for the microtubule motor cytoplasmic dynein-1. We report the structure of the 23 subunit dynactin complex by cryo-electron microscopy to 4.0Å. Our reconstruction reveals how dynactin is built around a filament containing eight copies of the actin related protein Arp1 and one of β-actin. Capped at each end by distinct protein complexes, the length of the filament is defined by elongated peptides that emerge from the α-helical shoulder domain. A further 8.2Å structure of the complex between dynein, dynactin and the motility inducing cargo adaptor Bicaudal-D2 shows how the translational symmetry of the dynein tail matches that of the dynactin filament. The Bicaudal-D2 coiled coil runs between dynein and dynactin to stabilize the mutually dependent interactions between all three components.Dynactin works with the cytoplasmic dynein-1 motor (dynein) to transport cargos along the microtubule cytoskeleton (1-3). They maintain the cell's spatial organization, return components from the cell's periphery and assist with cellular division (4). Mutations in either complex cause neurodegeneration (5) and both can be co-opted by viruses that travel to the nucleus (6). Dynein and dynactin are similar in size and complexity. Dynein contains two copies of 6 different proteins and has a mass of 1.4 MDa. Dynactin, at about 1.0 MDa, contains more than 20 subunits, corresponding to 12 different proteins. Dynactin is built around a filament of actin related protein 1 (Arp1). In analogy to actin, the filament has a barbed and a pointed end; each capped by a different protein complex. On top sits the shoulder domain (7) from which emerges a long projection, corresponding to dynactin's largest subunit p150 Glued (DCTN1) (8).Despite the presence of a dynein binding site in p150 Glued (9-11), purified dynein and dynactin only form a stable complex in the presence of the cargo adaptor Bicaudal D2 † To whom correspondence should be addressed: cartera@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk. Author contributions L.U. prepared dynactin and determined the TDB structure. K.Z. determined the structure of dynactin. A.G.D. and M.Y. determined the DHC N-terminus crystal structure. C.M. and M.A.S. prepared the dynein tail complex. N.A.P. and C.V.R performed mass spectrometry. A.P.C. initiated the project and designed the experiments.

Cytoplasmic dynein 1 is an important microtubule-based motor in many eukaryotic cells. Dynein has critical roles both in interphase and during cell division. Here, we focus on interphase cargoes of dynein, which include membrane-bound organelles, RNAs, protein complexes and viruses. A central challenge in the field is to understand how a single motor can transport such a diverse array of cargoes and how this process is regulated. The molecular basis by which each cargo is linked to dynein and its cofactor dynactin has started to emerge. Of particular importance for this process is a set of coiled-coil proteins - activating adaptors - that both recruit dynein-dynactin to their cargoes and activate dynein motility.

Cytoplasmic dynein is an approximately 1.4 MDa multi‐protein complex that transports many cellular cargoes towards the minus ends of microtubules. Several in vitro studies of mammalian dynein have suggested that individual motors are not robustly processive, raising questions about how dynein‐associated cargoes can move over long distances in cells. Here, we report the production of a fully recombinant human dynein complex from a single baculovirus in insect cells. Individual complexes very rarely show directional movement in vitro. However, addition of dynactin together with the N‐terminal region of the cargo adaptor BICD2 (BICD2N) gives rise to unidirectional dynein movement over remarkably long distances. Single‐molecule fluorescence microscopy provides evidence that BICD2N and dynactin stimulate processivity by regulating individual dynein complexes, rather than by promoting oligomerisation of the motor complex. Negative stain electron microscopy reveals the dynein–dynactin–BICD2N complex to be well ordered, with dynactin positioned approximately along the length of the dynein tail. Collectively, our results provide insight into a novel mechanism for coordinating cargo binding with long‐distance motor movement.