Until the Cultural Revolution, the predominant western view of
contemporary Chinese elite conflict was that it consisted of “discussion”
(t'ao-lun) within a basically consensual
Politburo among shifting “opinion groups” with no “organized force” behind
them. The purges and accusations which began in 1965 and apparently still
continue, have shaken this interpretation, and a number of scholars have
advanced new analyses - sometimes explicit, sometimes implicit, sometimes of
general application, sometimes applied only to a particular time span or
segment of the political system. Of these new views, perhaps the most
systematic - and at the same time the one which represents the least change
from the pre-Cultural Revolution “opinion group” model - is the “policy
making under Mao” interpretation, which sees conflict as essentially a
bureaucratic decision-making process dominated by Mao.
A 1990 national sample survey shows that the Chinese population was concerned with issues relating to reform, economic and social grievances, and democracy. Although neither political issues nor social cleavages were the same as in the West, the same dynamics affected the process of ideological alignment. Social position and cognitive sophistication help explain why members of the population hold liberal or conservative attitudes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.