No abstract

Studies of the DNA binding specificity of transcription factors belonging to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family have identified the so-called E-box, CACGTG, as being a high affinity specific binding sequence for this class of DNA binding proteins. Binding sequences for HeLa USF were selected from an initially random population of 20 bp sequences, defining the optimum USF binding sequence as R-5Y-4C-3A-2C-1G+1T+2G+3R+4Y+5. The significance of the flanking bases was further demonstrated by showing that USF and the related proteins c-Myc and Max discriminate between CACGTG-type E-boxes and that the primary means of discrimination appears to be the identity of the nucleotide at +/- 4, the presence of a T at -4 being inhibitory to binding by Myc but not by USF or Max. This suggests one mechanism by which bHLH factors are partitioned between multiple potential binding sequences in the promoters and enhancers of viral and cellular genes. It was also demonstrated that MgCl2 has a significant influence on USF DNA binding specificity. A broader range of USF binding sites was selected in the absence of MgCl2, conforming to the altered half-site consensus gTGaY. Binding studies with specific oligonucleotides demonstrated significantly improved tolerance to sequence variation at positions 1, 4, and to a lesser extent 5, of the GTGRY consensus in the absence of MgCl2. The results indicate that Mg2+ ions have an integral role in the formation of the USF-DNA complex.

Previously, we found that the cause of autosomal dominant selective tooth agenesis in one family is a missense mutation resulting in an arginine-to-proline substitution in the homeodomain of MSX1. To determine whether the tooth agenesis phenotype may result from haploinsufficiency or a dominant-negative mechanism, we have performed biochemical and functional analyses of the mutant protein Msx1(R31P). We show that Msx1(R31P) has perturbed structure and reduced thermostability compared with wild-type Msx1. As a consequence, the biochemical activities of Msx1(R31P) are severely impaired, since it exhibits little or no ability to interact with DNA or other protein factors or to function in transcriptional repression. We also show that Msx1(R31P) is inactive in vivo, since it does not display the activities of wild-type Msx1 in assays of ectopic expression in the limb. Furthermore, Msx1(R31P) does not antagonize the activity of wild-type Msx1 in any of these assays. Because Msx1(R31P) appears to be inactive and does not affect the action of wild-type Msx1, we propose that the phenotype of affected individuals with selective tooth agenesis is due to haploinsufficiency.

The ubiquitous Pit‐1‐Oct‐1‐Unc‐1 (POU)‐domain protein octamer 1 (Oct‐1) has been observed to bind specifically to a number of degenerate and dissimilar sequences. We have used antibodies directed against a C‐terminal Oct‐1 peptide to immunoselect binding sequences for HeLa cell Oct‐1 from random‐sequence oligonucleotides and we describe the isolation of binding sequences of considerable heterogeneity. Although our consensus alignment indicated a 9‐bp TATGCAAAT motif with AT‐rich flanking sequences, this binding motif is not immediately obvious in the population of sequences and no clone actually contained this sequence. Screening these Oct‐1‐binding sequences with a mouse whole‐brain extract demonstrated that the neuronal octamer‐binding proteins exhibit similar but distinct DNA sequence specificities. Unlike the reported selection of binding sequences for other transcription factors, the dependence of Oct‐1‐binding affinity upon sequence did not correspond tightly to the degree of conservation at particular positions of the consensus sequence. Our results suggest that either base‐specific hydrogen bonding is not the only major determinant of binding affinity and specificity, or that Oct‐1 binding to some sequences is mechanistically different from its binding to an octamer. These results exemplify the potential to overlook binding sites for some factors by searching gene sequences with a consensus nucleotide sequence.

No abstract

During endochondral ossification in the vertebrate limb, multipotent mesenchymal cells first differentiate into chondroblasts (chondrogenesis) that further differentiate (via chondrocyte hypertrophy) to a terminal cellular phenotype. Dlx5 and Dlx6 are functionally redundant regulators of chondrocyte hypertrophy. We now show that Dlx5 and Dlx6 also regulate the earlier step of chondrogenesis in the limb. Limb bud mesenchymal cells from Dlx5/6(-/-) embryos show reduced chondrogenesis compared to wild-type littermates, and expression of either Dlx5 or Dlx6 stimulated differentiation of limb bud mesenchymal cells to chondroblasts. The functional overlap between Dlx5 and Dlx6 occurs despite the fact that the amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains of the encoded proteins are dissimilar. In order to reconcile the disparity between the divergent structures of Dlx5 and Dlx6 with their overlapping biological functions, we investigated the domain requirements and transcriptional activities associated with Dlx5- and Dlx6-mediated chondrogenesis. We find distinct domain requirements for the chondrogenic function of these related homeoproteins, indicating divergent molecular mechanisms of action.

expression is seen within differentiated epithelial cells of several organs, as well as in skeletal and cardiac muscle, and various tissues of neural crest origin. Interestingly, all Shc family members are expressed in hypertrophic chondrocytes, the first report of Shc protein expression in the developing skeleton. The unique tissue distribution patterns of Shc proteins likely contribute to their complex tissuespecific signaling functions during embryogenesis. Developmental Dynamics 240:221-231,

To the authors' knowledge, this report describes the Ist case of myotonia in an Australian Cattle Dog and represents the 1st non-Schnauzer canine myotonia to be genetically characterized. In addition, we developed a polymerase chain reaction-based genetic screen to detect heterozygotes with this mutation in the at-large Australian Cattle Dog population.