Objective
To evaluate a swallow preservation protocol (SPP) in which patients received swallow therapy before, during, and after radiation treatment and its efficacy in maintaining swallowing function in head and neck cancer patients.
Design
Case series with chart review.
Setting
Tertiary care academic medical center.
Subjects and Methods
Eighty-five patients who received radiation (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) participated in the SPP from 2007 to 2012. Subjects were divided into 2 groups: compliant and noncompliant with SPP. At each SPP visit, the diet of each patient was recorded as regular (chewable), puree, liquid, or gastrostomy tube (G-tube) dependent, along with their compliance with the swallow exercises. Patients were stratified by age, gender, tumor stage, type of treatment, radiation dose, diet change, dysguesia, odynophagia, pain, and stenosis. Statistical analysis was performed comparing the 2 compliance groups in regards to swallowing-related outcomes at 1 month after completion of therapy.
Results
Fifty-seven patients were compliant and 28 were non-compliant with SPP during treatment. The compliant group had a higher percentage of patients tolerating a regular diet (54.4% vs 21.4%, P = .008), a lower G-tube dependence (22.8% vs 53.6%, P = .008), and a higher rate of maintaining or improving their diet (54.4% vs 25.0%, P = .025) compared to noncompliant patients.
Conclusion
A swallow preservation protocol appears to help maintain or improve swallow function in head and neck cancer patients undergoing RT or CRT. Patients who are able to comply with swallow exercises are less likely to worsen their diet, receive a G-tube, or develop stenosis.
Purpose
Tracheoesophageal Puncture (TEP) is an effective rehabilitation method for postlaryngectomy speech and has already been described as a procedure that is safely performed in the office. We review our long-term experience with office-based TEP over the past seven years in the largest cohort published to date.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent TEP by a single surgeon from 2005 through 2012, including office-based and operating room procedures. Indications for the chosen technique (office versus operating room) and surgical outcomes were evaluated.
Results
59 patients underwent 72 TEP procedures, with 55 performed in the outpatient setting and 17 performed in the operating room, all without complication. The indications for performing TEP’s in the operating room included 2 primary TEP’s, 14 due to concomitant procedures requiring general anesthesia, and 1 due to failed attempt at office-based TEP. 19 patients with prior rotational or free flap reconstruction successfully underwent office-based TEP.
Conclusions
TEP in an office-based setting with immediate voice prosthesis placement continues to be a safe method of voice rehabilitation for postlaryngectomy patients, including those who have previously undergone free flap or rotational flap reconstruction. Office-based TEP is now our primary approach for postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation.
There is a role for partial epiglottoplasty in patients with dysphagia attributed to hypopharyngeal crowding from cervical spine pathology. Surgery enables reduced vallecular residue and improved functional swallowing outcomes.
Voice prosthesis sizing was better in patients who had office-based TEP than in patients who had operating room-based TEP. This outcome is likely due to the lesser degree of swelling of the tracheoesophageal party wall in the office-based procedure.
Objectives
To determine symptoms and findings in patients with dysphagia related to epiglottic dysfunction. To analyze outcomes in patients who underwent partial epiglottidectomy due to dysphagia related to epiglottic dysfunction
Study Design
Review and analysis of clinical data obtained as part of the diagnosis and treatment of patients with dysphagia related to epiglottic dysfunction.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of all post-treatment head and neck cancer patients who underwent epiglottidectomy at a single tertiary care referral center. Objective pre- and post-procedure swallow findings, endoscopic evaluation, and subjective improvement based on patient self-report were reviewed.
Results
Seven patients were identified based on endoscopic evaluation and modified barium swallow study (MBSS) as having epiglottic pathology leading to dysphagia. Specific anatomic and functional findings included thickening of the epiglottis, absence of epiglottic deflection, vallecular bolus retention during and after the swallow, and bolus backflow from the pharynx to the oral or nasal cavity. Partial epiglottidectomy was performed in these patients. Post-operative MBSS was analyzed for changes in swallow efficiency and safety. Nearly all patients demonstrated improved pharyngeal bolus passage with little to no added swallowing morbidity.
Conclusions
Preliminary findings suggest a role for partial epiglottidectomy in post-treatment head and neck cancer patients with swallowing disorders. Ideal candidates have intact tongue base contraction and poor retroflexion of the epiglottis, which result in bolus obstruction at the level of the valleculae. Partial epiglottic resection enables improved bolus passage in the pharyngeal phase. Minimal post-operative morbidity occurs in the appropriately selected patient.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.