No abstract

Background: Chronic illness management is increasingly carried out at home by individuals and their informal caregivers (dyads). Although synergistic in concept, the nuances of dyadic congruence in caring for patients with heart failure are largely unexamined. Aims: The purpose of this study was to examine the role of dyadic-type congruence on patient self-care (maintenance, symptom perception, and management) while controlling for actor and partner effects. Methods: This secondary data analysis of 277 dyads consisted of a series of multilevel models to examine the impact of dyadic congruence on a patient’s self-care maintenance, symptom perception, and self-care management. Patient-level and caregiver-level data were input into each model simultaneously to account differential appraisals of factors related to the dyad. Results: Bivariate analyses yielded dyad congruence which was associated with better patient self-care maintenance, symptom perception and management. However, after multilevel models were constructed, dyad congruence was found to be a significant predictor of patient’s symptom perception scores, but not self-care maintenance or management scores. Caregiver’s satisfaction with the dyad was differentially and significantly associated with self-care – it was inversely associated with patient self-care maintenance and positively associated with patient self-care management. Conclusion: This is the first study, to our knowledge, reporting that congruence in heart failure dyads is associated with better patient symptom perception and this advances our prior hypothesis that dyad typologies could be used to predict patient self-care performance. Since symptom perception is the key to preventing heart failure exacerbation, screening heart failure patient and caregiver dyads for congruence is important in clinical settings.

No abstract

BackgroundThe novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has plagued countries worldwide. This pandemic has greatly affected healthcare delivery and those providing care to vulnerable, immunocompromised patients undergoing cancer treatment, who are at a higher risk for poorer outcomes related to COVID-19.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the impact of COVID-19 on oncology healthcare professionals (OHCPs).MethodsAn exploratory study design was employed using semistructured interviews. A thematic analysis was completed using Atlas.ti software.ResultsOf 30 OHCP participants, most were female (90%), registered nurses (70%), and bachelor's prepared (66%). The following themes emerged: (1) pandemic-related restrictions and stress on personal lives impacted the ability of OHCPs to rejuvenate and reenergize for work; (2) fear of exposure and transmission and concern for high-risk status for contracting COVID-19; (3) limited resources and inconsistent communication about organizational policies caused additional stress, affecting OHCP trust and confidence in the system; (4) concern for the mental health of fellow OCHPs; (5) adaptation and resilience were required amidst shifting workloads, workflow, and new restrictions; and (6) importance of self-care to reduce personal/professional stressors.ConclusionsOncology healthcare professionals continue to face challenges of COVID-19 on their personal and professional lives yet have shown resilience during these unprecedented times.Implications for PracticeOncology healthcare professionals need to advocate for appropriate personal protective equipment and reliable mental health support services through employers. They should be engaged in COVID-19 task forces to ensure their challenges are heard and needs are addressed to provide quality oncology care.

Self-care improves quality of life, and reduces exacerbations and mortality risk in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this report is to describe the development and testing of the feasibility and acceptability of a digital, educational self-care intervention designed to improve self-care ability, adherence, knowledge, somatic symptoms, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. This pilot study was a quasi-experimental, repeated measures design. Self-care behaviors were identified, and educational modules were developed and built into a web-based platform. Twenty participants were enrolled to determine feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. The intervention was deemed acceptable and feasible as evidenced by > 95% completion rates and high degree of participation. Overall, the intervention was well received and is feasible for future home-based interventions in those with COPD. Results included significant improvements in adherence and knowledge, and significant associations between self-care ability, adherence, and depressive symptoms.

Clinical and managerial competence, engagement with their employees, and presence on the unit are keys to retaining a satisfied nursing workforce.

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) manifests after alcohol-dependent individuals suddenly cease alcohol consumption. Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment-Alcohol, revised (CIWA-Ar) is a widely used tool to assess and guide treatment of AWS. CIWA-Ar was developed in voluntarily detoxification centers, and the reliability and validity of CIWA-Ar have been minimally evaluated in hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective chart review of 479 cases of screening and treatment of AWS using CIWA-Ar, of which 118 were admitted to a trauma/orthopedic (T/O) service and 361 to an internal medicine (IM) service. Exploratory factor analyses with varimax rotation were applied for each population, and reliability testing was performed on the determined subscales. Exploratory factor analyses yielded 2 unique structures, each explaining 56% of the variance of CIWA-Ar. The IM group had a 3-factor structure with the Physical Disturbances (23%), Anxiety (19%), and Confusion (14%) subscales. The T/O group had a 2-factor structure with the Neurological Disturbances (36%) and Physical Disturbances (20%) subscales. Overall, Cronbach's alphas were acceptable (0.74 and 0.82 for IM and T/O, respectively); however, Cronbach's alphas for the IM subscales were 0.66 and 0.69 for physical disturbances and anxiety, respectively. Cronbach's alpha for the Confusion subscale was not calculated because only 1 scale item loaded. The subscales of the T/O factor structure yielded Cronbach's alphas of 0.81 for neurological disturbances and 0.62 for physical disturbances. Our analyses did not support the reliability or validity of CIWA-Ar in acutely ill or injured patients, warranting further investigation and tool development for AWS management in the hospital setting.

No abstract