AIMSMedication is one of the main causes of long QT syndrome (LQTS) and torsades de pointes (TdP), and the older adult population is at particularly high risk. The aim of the present study was to describe the prescription patterns of drugs with a risk of TdP in the Colombian older adult population. METHODSPatients older than 65 years who received medication with a risk of TdP during three consecutive months were selected. The medication was obtained and classified according to the QT Drug List from Crediblemeds.org. The data were analysed using SPSS-22. RESULTSA total of 55 932 patients were chronically receiving QT-prolonging drugs; 61.9% (n = 34 ,632) were women and the mean age of the sample was 75.6 years. Drugs with a conditional risk were consumed by 95.2% of patients, 5.3% received drugs with a known risk and 2.9% received drugs with a possible risk. Two or more QT-prolonging drugs were consumed by 10.3% of the patients (n = 5786). Most of the sample (96.8%, n = 54 170) had at least one additional risk factor for LQTS, with a mean of 3.1 ± 0.9 risk factors. Patients receiving QT-prolonging drugs for psychiatric and neurological disease were at a higher risk of major polypharmacy [odds ratio (OR) 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.80, 3.22) and of receiving high doses of QT-prolonging drugs (OR 3.8; 95% CI 3.52, 4.05). CONCLUSIONSThe widespread use of medication that causes TdP and the high prevalence of additional risks in the older adult population raise the need for accurate prediction of risk and constant patient monitoring. Patients taking psychiatric drugs are at a higher risk of TdP. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT• Some drug classes are considered to be one of the main causes of long QT syndrome (LQTS) and torsades de pointes (TdP), and this serious adverse drug reaction has gained attention over time.• The older adult population using medication related to LQTS and TdP has multiple risk factors that may increase the probability of these adverse outcomes. • Studies have identified risk patterns for TdP in acute care but data on their chronic use are scarce. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS• 10.6% of the older adult population in Columbia was found to consume chronically drugs with QT interval-prolonging potential. Most of these patients were consuming drugs with a conditional risk, but 98% of them had at least one risk factor for LQTS and TdP.• Use of QT-prolonging drugs for psychiatric and neurological disorders was higher among women, and increased with age. In addition, the use of this type of drug was associated with an increase in the risk of major polypharmacy, and of receiving concurrent use of more than one QT drug and high doses.• Clinicians should keep in mind that common cardiovascular and noncardiovascular drugs are associated with LQTS and TdP, and should routinely assess the associated risk factors, including an electrocardiographic study before and after prescribing these drugs.
Introducción. La enfermedad de Parkinson, cuya prevalencia en Colombia es de 4,7 por 1.000 habitantes, constituye un problema de salud pública y un reto terapéutico para los profesionales de la salud.Objetivo. Determinar los patrones de prescripción de fármacos antiparkinsonianos y las variables asociadas con su utilización en una población colombiana.Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio descriptivo de corte transversal. A partir de una base de datos de 3,5 millones de afiliados al sistema de salud, se seleccionaron pacientes con prescripción de medicamentos antiparkinsonianos de manera ininterrumpida entre el 1º de enero y el 31 de marzo de 2015. Se incluyeron variables sociodemográficas, farmacológicas y de medicación concomitante. El análisis multivariado se hizo con el programa IBM SPSS™-22.Resultados. Se hallaron 2.898 pacientes, con una edad media de 65,1 años, de los cuales el 50,7 % correspondía a hombres. El 69,4 % (n=2.010) de las personas recibía monoterapia y el 30,6 %, tratamiento combinado con dos a cinco medicamentos antiparkinsonianos. Los más prescritos eran la levodopa (45,5 %; n=1.318 pacientes), el biperideno (23,1 %; n=670), la amantadina (18,3 %; n=531) y el pramipexol (16,3 %; n=471). La asociación más utilizada fue la de levodopa-carbidopa y entacapone (n=311; 10,7 %). En el análisis multivariado se encontró que ser hombre (odds ratio, OR=1,56; IC95% 1,321-1,837), ser mayor de 60 años (OR=1,41; IC95% 1,112-1,782) y recibir tratamiento en Barranquilla (OR=2,23; IC95% 1,675-2,975), se asociaban con una mayor probabilidad de emplear el tratamiento combinado. Al 68,2 % (n=1.977) de los pacientes se les había prescrito tratamiento concomitante con otros medicamentos.Conclusión. Predominaron los hábitos de prescripción de medicamentos con gran valor terapéutico, principalmente en la monoterapia, la mayoría en las dosis usuales recomendadas. Es necesario explorar la efectividad clínica de las prescripciones estudiadas, y diferenciar entre la enfermedad y los subtipos de síndromes parkinsonianos.
We determined the pyridostigmine prescription pattern in a population of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted by using a prescription database of 3.5 million individuals from which patients who had been diagnosed with MG and for whom pyridostigmine had been prescribed were selected. A total of 306 outpatients with MG were found, and 258 were receiving pyridostigmine (mean age 53.0 ± 18.0 years). The calculated prevalence of MG was 86.7 cases per million persons. Monotherapy was used by 53.1% of the patients, prednisolone was used by 21.7%, and 30.2% used other immunomodulators. Medications for other comorbidities were taken by 74.8% of the patients, and 43.4% had prescriptions that could potentially trigger worsening symptoms. Pyridostigmine is being prescribed at doses close to the defined daily doses predominantly as monotherapy. A high proportion of patients were also prescribed a medication that could aggravate their condition, including some that can trigger a myasthenic crisis. Muscle Nerve 56: 1041-1046, 2017.
Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected millions of people worldwide, and several sociodemographic variables, comorbidities and care variables have been associated with complications and mortality. Objective To identify the factors associated with admission to intensive care units (ICUs) and mortality in patients with COVID-19 from 4 clinics in Colombia. Methods This was a follow-up study of a cohort of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March and August 2020. Sociodemographic, clinical (Charlson comorbidity index and NEWS 2 score) and pharmacological variables were identified. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with the risk of admission to the ICU and death (p<0.05). Results A total of 780 patients were analyzed, with a median age of 57.0 years; 61.2% were male. On admission, 54.9% were classified as severely ill, 65.3% were diagnosed with acute respiratory distress syndrome, 32.4% were admitted to the ICU, and 26.0% died. The factors associated with a greater likelihood of ICU admission were severe pneumonia (OR: 9.86; 95%CI:5.99–16.23), each 1-point increase in the NEWS 2 score (OR:1.09; 95%CI:1.002–1.19), history of ischemic heart disease (OR:3.24; 95%CI:1.16–9.00), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR:2.07; 95%CI:1.09–3.90). The risk of dying increased in those older than 65 years (OR:3.08; 95%CI:1.66–5.71), in patients with acute renal failure (OR:6.96; 95%CI:4.41–11.78), admitted to the ICU (OR:6.31; 95%CI:3.63–10.95), and for each 1-point increase in the Charlson comorbidity index (OR:1.16; 95%CI:1.002–1.35). Conclusions Factors related to increasing the probability of requiring ICU care or dying in patients with COVID-19 were identified, facilitating the development of anticipatory intervention measures that favor comprehensive care and improve patient prognosis.
Summary Aims To determine the frequency of excessive polypharmacy (≥15 medications) in an outpatient population from Colombia and the variables associated with this condition. Methods A cross‐sectional study using a systematised database of 6.2 million affiliates of the Colombian Health System. All patients treated uninterruptedly with 15 or more medications for 3 months (January‐March 2017) were included. Sociodemographic, pharmacological, potential drug interactions, and prescribers' variables were identified. Results A total of 264 patients with prescriptions of ≥15 medications were identified; with an estimated prevalence of excessive polypharmacy of 108.4 per 100 000 people. The mean age was 67.7 ± 17.8 years and 60.6% were females. The mean number of medications per patient was 20.1 ± 4.5 and 48.9% (n = 129) had 20 or more. The most used were antiulcer medications (89.0%; n = 235), antihypertensives (85.6%; n = 226), analgesic/antipyretic (80.3%; n = 212), psychiatric/neurologic medications (78.5%; n = 207), statins (67.4%; n = 178), acetylsalicylic acid (59.5%; n = 157), and vitamins (57.2%; n = 151). On average, each patient had 21.0 ± 11.4 drug‐drug interactions and were attended by 6.2 ± 3.1 physicians. Being treated by seven or more physicians (OR: 5.09; 95% CI: 1.64‐15.79) increased the probability of receiving more than 20 medications. Conclusions Drugs for treatment of chronic conditions prevailed, especially in elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions; however, some groups of medications without clear indications, such as antiulcer medications or vitamin supplements, also had extensive use. A main factor that increases the probability of polypharmacy greater than 20 drugs is care by seven or more physicians, which shows a fragmentation in patient care by the country's health system, without achieving co‐ordination and integration between the different agents involved in medical care, also influenced by different physicians′ practice patterns.
Submissions should be made via our electronic submission system at http://ees.elsevier.com/ thelancet/
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.