Mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), defined as rupture of fetal membranes prior to 28 weeks of gestation, complicates approximately 0.4%-0.7% of all pregnancies. This condition is associated with a very high neonatal mortality rate as well as an increased risk of long-and short-term severe neonatal morbidity. The causes of the mid-trimester PPROM are multifactorial. Altered membrane morphology including marked swelling and disruption of the collagen network which is seen with PPROM can be triggered by bacterial products or/and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) have been implicated in the mechanism of PPROM. The propagation of bacteria is an important contributing factor not only in PPROM, but also in adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes after PPROM. Inflammatory mediators likely play a causative role in both disruption of fetal membrane integrity and activation of uterine contraction. The "classic PPROM" with oligo/anhydramnion is associated with a short latency period and worse neonatal outcome compared to similar gestational aged neonates delivered without antecedent PPROM. The "high PPROM" syndrome is defined as a defect of the chorio-amniotic membranes, which is not located over the internal cervical os. It may be associated with either a normal or reduced amount of amniotic fluid. It may explain why sensitive biochemical tests such as the Amniosure (PAMG-1) or IGFBP-1/alpha fetoprotein test can have a positive result without other signs of overt ROM such as fluid leakage with Valsalva. The membrane defect following fetoscopy also fulfils the criteria for "high PPROM" syndrome. In some cases, the rupture of only one membrane -either the chorionic or amniotic membrane, resulting in "pre-PPROM" could precede "classic PPROM" or "high PPROM". The diagnosis of PPROM is classically established by identification of nitrazine positive, fern positive watery leakage from the cervical canal observed during in specula investigation. Other more recent diagnostic tests include the vaginal swab assay for placental alpha macroglobulin-1 test or AFP and IGFBP1. In some rare cases amniocentesis and infusion of indigo carmine has been used to confirm the diagnosis of PPROM. The management of the PPROM requires balancing the potential neonatal benefits from prolongation of the pregnancy with the risk of intraamniotic infection and its consequences for the mother and infant. Close monitoring for signs of chorioamnionitis (e.g. body temperature, CTG, CRP, leucocytes, IL-6, procalcitonine, amniotic fluid examinations) is necessary to minimize the risk of neonatal and maternal complications. In addition to delayed delivery, broad spectrum antibiotics of penicillin or cephalosporin group and/or macrolide and corticosteroids have been show to improve neonatal outcome [reducing risk of chorioamnionitis (average risk ratio (RR) = 0.66), neonatal infections (RR = 0.67) and abnormal ultrasound scan of neonatal brain (RR = 0.67)]. The positive effect of continuo...

Objective To assess maternal morbidity and outcome in women undergoing minimal-access fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Methods

Bacterial infection is one of the main causes of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) leading to preterm delivery, pulmonary hypoplasia, sepsis and joint deformities. Expectant management, broad-spectrum antibiotics and antenatal corticosteroids are routinely used in this condition with very limited success to prevent bacteremia, chorioamnionitis, funisitis and intra-amniotic infection syndrome. Here, we report a case in which we attempted to treat PPROM at 26⁺³ weeks of gestation with anhydramnion colonized by multiresistant Klebsiella. A perinatal port system was implanted subcutaneously at 28⁺⁰ weeks of gestation, enabling long-term continuous lavage of the amniotic cavity with a hypotonic aqueous composition similar to human amniotic fluid combined with intra-amniotic antibiotic application. The patient gave birth to a preterm female infant at 31⁺¹ weeks without any signs of infection. The girl was discharged with a weight of 2,730 g in very good condition. In the follow-up examinations at 5 months and 1 year of age, there was no apparent neurological disturbance, developmental delay or Klebsiella colonization.

Background: Since the introduction of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) in unifocal vulvar cancer (diameter of < 4cm) and unsuspicious groin lymph nodes, the morbidity rate of patients has significantly decreased globally. In contrast to SLNB, bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) has been associated with increased risk of common morbidities. Current guidelines (NCCN, ESGO, RCOG, and German) recommend that in cases of unilaterally positive sentinel lymph node (SLN), bilateral IFL should be performed. However, two recent publications by Woelber et al. and Nica et al. contradict the current guideline, since a significant rate of positive non sentinel lymph nodes in IFL contralaterally was not observed (Woelber et al. 0% (p=0/28) and Nica et al. 5.3% (p=1/19)). Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis conducted in the University Hospital of Dusseldorf, evaluating vulvar cancer patients treated with SLNB from 2002 to 2018. Results: 22.2% of women (n=4/18) were found to have contralateral IFL groin metastasis after an initial diagnosis of unilateral SLN metastasis. The depth of tumor infiltrating cells correlated significantly and positively with the rate of incidence of groin metastasis (p=0.0038). Conclusion: Current guideline for bilateral IFL should remain as the standard management. Therefore, this depth may be taken into account as an indication for bilateral IFL. The management of VC and SLNB should be performed in a high volume center with an experienced team in marking SLN and performing the adequate surgical procedure. Well conducted counseling of the patients outlining advantages but also potential oncological risks of this technique especially concerning rate of groin recurrence is critical.

Background Since the introduction of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) in unifocal vulvar cancer (diameter of < 4 cm) and unsuspicious groin lymph nodes, the morbidity rate of patients has significantly decreased globally. In contrast to SLNB, bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) has been associated with increased risk of common morbidities. Current guidelines (NCCN, ESGO, RCOG, and German) recommend that in cases of unilaterally positive sentinel lymph node (SLN), bilateral IFL should be performed. However, two recent publications by Woelber et al. and Nica et al. contradict the current guideline, since a significant rate of positive non sentinel lymph nodes in IFL contralaterally was not observed [Woelber et al. 0% (p = 0/28) and Nica et al. 5.3% (p = 1/19)]. Methods A retrospective single-center analysis conducted in the University Hospital of Dusseldorf, evaluating vulvar cancer patients treated with SLNB from 2002 to 2018. Results 22.2% of women (n = 4/18) were found to have contralateral IFL groin metastasis after an initial diagnosis of unilateral SLN metastasis. The depth of tumor infiltrating cells correlated significantly and positively with the rate of incidence of groin metastasis (p = 0.0038). Conclusion Current guideline for bilateral IFL should remain as the standard management. Therefore, this depth may be taken into account as an indication for bilateral IFL. The management of VC and SLNB should be performed in a high volume center with an experienced team in marking SLN and performing the adequate surgical procedure. Well conducted counseling of the patients outlining advantages but also potential oncological risks of this technique especially concerning rate of groin recurrence is critical.

Background: Sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) technique in unifocal vulvar cancer (diameter of < 4cm) and unsuspicious groin lymph nodes, the morbidity rate of patients has significantly decreased all over the world. In contrast to SLNB, bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) has been associated with increased risk of common morbidities. Current guidelines (NCCN, ESGO, RCOG, and German) suggest that in cases of metastasis of unilateral SLNB, groin node dissection with IFL, should be performed bilaterally. However, a publication by Woelber et al. 0% (p=0/28) and Nica et al. 5.3% (p=1/19) contradicted the current guideline. Methods: A single-center analysis conducted in the University Hospital of Dusseldorf, evaluating vulvar cancer patients treated with SLNB retrospectively from 2002 to 2018. Result, discussion and conclusion: Current guideline for bilateral IFL should remain as the standard management because 22.2% women (n=4/18) had contralateral IFL groin metastasis after unilateral SLNB metastasis initially. The depth of tumor infiltrating cells was correlated significantly and positively with the incidence rate of groin metastasis (p=0.0038). Therefore, it is an indication for bilateral IFL.

Background The incidence of vulvar cancer (VC) in pregnancy is unknown due to its rarity; between 1955 and 2014 only 36 case reports were reported worldwide. Underreporting may also be a contributing factor to the unknown incidence of VC in pregnancy. The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnosis, treatment and outcome of vulvar cancer cases diagnosed during pregnancy and/or breastfeeding. Case presentation Patient 1 was diagnosed at 18 weeks’ gestation (WG) with Grade 2 VC (pT1a, pN0, 0/4 sentinel lymph nodes biopsy (SLNB) involved) and was treated by having the tumor resected (R0). She is currently recurrence-free at 4 years post-diagnosis. Patient 2 was diagnosed at 7 WG with Grade 2 VC (pT1b, pN1a, 1/17 SLNB, R0) and was treated during the first trimester and during the second trimester with SLNB. She is currently recurrence-free at 5 years post-diagnosis. Patient 3 was diagnosed at 30 WG with Grade 2 VC (pT1b, pN0, 0/5 SLNB, R0). She subsequently experienced a number of local recurrences postpartum that were managed by resection and is currently recurrence-free at 3 years post-diagnosis. Patient 4 was diagnosed a VL later, at 14 months during breastfeeding, that was diagnosed as Grade 3 VC (pT1b, pN1a, 1/14 SLNB, R0). The patient is currently recurrence-free at 9 years post-diagnosis. Patient 5 was not diagnosed during pregnancy, but was diagnosed with G3 VC (pT2, pN2c, 2/17 SLNB, R0) 8 months postpartum. The patient due to the extent of tumor involvement and lymph node metastasis, underwent chemoradiation therapy post-surgery. Despite adjuvant therapy, the patient progressed and developed bone metastases. Analysis of the tumour tissue revealed increased expression of PD-L1 (programmed cell death protein 1) indicating that the patient may have benefited from treatment with nivolumab to block the PD-L1 interaction; unfortunately the patient passed away at 24 months post-diagnosis before immunotherapy treatment could commence. Conclusion Surgical resection and simultaneous SLNB in VC cases are considered safe during pregnancy, with comparable outcomes to non-pregnant women. Prompt diagnostic workup and treatment should never be delayed during pregnancy as delayed diagnosis could lead to tumour progression with fatal consequences.

No abstract