The recently introduced dual-layer stents have a higher risk of acute occlusion compared with single-layer stents in the treatment of acute stroke.

No abstract

This small retrospective case-control study did not reveal a significant influence of peri-interventional SAH due to angiographically occult perforations on neurologic outcome of patients treated with stent retrievers.

Not only size but also position of flow-diverting devices have a considerable impact on the intra-aneurysmal flow dynamics. The suggested evaluation criteria allowed a quantitative comparison of flow-diverting effect using syngo iFlow and could represent an efficient tool for predicting flow diversion pre-procedurally.

In-stent stenosis is a common finding on short term follow-up after the treatment with flow diverters but improves over time.

Background Endovascular stents are commonly used during neurointerventional procedures; however, the concomitant use of dual anti-platelet treatment (DAPT) can limit their use. There is a need to develop stent coatings that mitigate requirement for DAPT. Methods The hydrophilic polymer coating is a novel glycan-based multilayer polymer that inhibits platelet adhesion. After Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, 18 New Zealand white rabbits (mean weight 4.02 ± 0.51 kg) were commenced on DAPT (ASA 10 mg/kg/day and clopidogrel 10 mg/kg/day). A bare nitinol pCONUS and coated pCONUS HPC were implanted into the common carotid arteries of each rabbit. Histological examinations were performed at 30 days ( n = 9) and 180 days ( n = 8) to assess the acute and chronic inflammatory reactions to the pCONUS HPC. Wilcoxon/Kruskal–Wallis and ANOVA were used with p value < 0.05 considered as significant. Results There is no statistically significant difference in inflammation within the intima/media or adventitia at 30 days ( p = 0.3901 and p = 1, respectively) or at 180 days ( p = 0.144 and p = 1, respectively) between pCONUS and pCONUS HPC cohorts. There is no significant difference in the presence of granulomas or giant cells between the cohorts at either 30 days ( p = 1 and p = 0.8363) or 180 days ( p = 1.00 and p = 0.149). At 30 days and 180 days, there was near-complete endothelialisation of the stent struts and no significant difference between the pCONUS or pCONUS HPC ( p = 0.7832 and p = 0.334, respectively). Conclusion pCONUS HPC stents do not elicit an acute or chronic inflammatory response in vivo with no significant difference in the tissue response to bare nitinol pCONUS stents or pCONUS HPC stents.

The Derivo Embolization Device provides excellent occlusion of elastase-induced aneurysms while preserving branch arteries.

BackgroundFlow diverters (FDs) are widely used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, but the required medication increases the risk of haemorrhagic complications and limits their use in the acute setting. Surface modified FDs may limit the need for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Hydrophilic polymer coating (HPC) may reduce the need of medication.MethodsThis explorative study, approved by the local authorities and the local welfare committee, compared stent behaviour and overall tissue response between HPC-coated FDs and uncoated FDs, both implanted into the common carotid arteries of eight New Zealand white rabbits. Endothelialisation, inflammatory response, and performance during implantation were assessed. Angiographic follow-up was performed to observe the patency of the devices after implantation and after 30 days. Histological examinations were performed at 30 days to assess foreign body reaction and endothelialisation. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare non-parametric variables.ResultsAngiography showed that both coated and uncoated FDs performed well during implantation. All devices remained patent during immediate follow-up and after 30 days. Histopathology showed no significant difference in inflammation within the vessel wall between the two cohorts (2.12 ± 0.75 vs. 1.96 ± 0.79, p = 0.7072). Complete endothelialisation of the stent struts was seen with very similar (0.04 ± 0.02 mm vs. 0.04 ± 0.03 mm, p = 0.892) neoendothelial thickness between the two cohorts after 30 days.ConclusionTaking into account the limitation in sample size, non-significant differences between the HPC-coated and uncoated FDs regarding implantation, foreign body response, and endothelialisation were found.