The activities of certain genes as a consequence of exposure to stressors related to typical handling procedures in aquaculture have not been studied in sufficient detail in fish. A stress trial with koi carp was, therefore, conducted, aiming at identifying relevant gene expression patterns in different brain regions during stress responses. The following stressors were selected: tank manipulation, distress caused by exposure to air and eustress due to feed rewards. Responses to these stressors were evaluated 10, 30 and 60 min after their application. The exact determination of gene expression profiles in the carp brain required the comparison of several suitable reference genes, which is also highly recommended for other studies focusing on the fish brain. Moreover, and as expected, the mRNA expression of a number of early immediate genes indicated activity in different brain regions as a response to changes in rearing and experimental conditions. In addition, the mRNA expression of metabolic genes was investigated, since increased brain activity may also increase the metabolic demands of certain brain areas. Furthermore, genes related to the stress axis were included in the study. The mRNA expression patterns of genes belonging to the stress axis revealed that negative stress caused by exposure to air had broad‐ranging effects on the gene regulation patterns in the fish brain, even if the fish were only treated for 1 min. This parallels the effects that have been observed on blood cortisol and glucose. In contrast, a limited number of genes allows discrimination of eustress and distress, which indicates that further research is needed in the future. Finally, the use of different control groups is highly recommended for fish experiments to correct for typical experimental procedures such as lid openings or social isolation.

Welfare in animal husbandry includes considerations of biology, ethics, ecology, law and economics. These diverse aspects must be translated into common quantifiable parameters and applicable methods to objectively assess welfare in animals. To assist this process in the field of aquaculture, where such methods are largely missing, we developed a model to assess fish welfare. A network of information was created to link needs, i.e., fundamental requirements for welfare, with parameters, i.e., quantifiable aspects of welfare. From this ontology, 80 parameters that are relevant for welfare, have practicable assessment methods and deliver reliable results were selected and incorporated into a model. The model, named MyFishCheck, allows the evaluation of welfare in five distinct modules: farm management, water quality, fish group behaviour, fish external and fish internal appearance, thereby yielding five individual grades categorising welfare ranging from critical, to poor, to acceptable, and good. To facilitate the use of the model, a software application was written. With its adaptability to different fish species, farming systems, regulations and purposes as well as its user-friendly digital version, MyFishCheck is a next step towards improved fish welfare assessment and provides a basis for ongoing positive developments for the industry, the farmers and the fish.

No abstract

Two four-week feeding trials were conducted with fingerlings of Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis, 3.52 ± 0.08 g) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, 1.49 ± 0.05 g) fed with graded levels of dried (DWD) and fermented (DWF) duckweed meal (Spirodela polyrhiza). The purpose of these two trials was to evaluate DWD and DWF as replacements for fishmeal. Fishmeal protein was substituted by 12%, 24%, and 35% of duckweed protein and compared to control diets containing 40% (for perch) and 35% (for rainbow trout) fishmeal and no duckweed. The performance of the fish (growth, feed conversion, and protein and lipid utilization) and their whole-body composition were evaluated and compared with the control. While even the lowest inclusion level, regardless of its form (dried or fermented), resulted in significantly reduced performance in Eurasian perch, rainbow trout were able to utilize feed containing duckweed meal considerably well. Compared to the control, at a 12% inclusion level, rainbow trout showed an equal or comparable percent weight gain (PWG; DWD: 377%, DWF: 373%), specific growth rate (SGR; DWD: 4.37%/day, DWF: 4.33%/day), feed conversion ratio (FCR; DWD: 1.11, DWF: 1.12), and protein productive value (PPV; DWD: 21.5%, DWF: 21.2%). Increasing the inclusion levels above 12% of both DWD and DWF resulted in reduced performance in rainbow trout, with the most pronounced effects observed in the DWD35 group. All experimental diets, including control, affected the whole body composition of perch, most notably reducing the lipid content compared to initial fish. Compared to initial, control and DWD rainbow trout increased whole-body protein, lipid, and ash contents. In conclusion, for rainbow trout, fermented and dried S. polyrhiza duckweed meal appears to be a promising feed ingredient when used at a maximum inclusion level of 12%, while for Eurasian perch, it should not be considered as a feed ingredient.

Our understanding of the timing of stress responses and specific roles of different regulatory pathways that drive stress responses is incomplete. In particular, the regulation of appetite genes as a consequence of exposure to different stressors has not been studied in sufficient detail in fish. Therefore, a stress trial was conducted with koi carp, aiming at identifying typical effects of stress on regulation of appetite genes. The stressors tank manipulation, air exposure and feed rewarding were chosen. The responses to these stressors were evaluated 10, 30 and 60 min after the stressors were applied. Orexigenic and anorexigenic genes were investigated in four different brain regions (telencephalon, hypothalamus, optic tectum and rhombencephalon). The results show that, apart from the typical appetite regulation in the hypothalamus, the different brain regions also display pronounced responses of appetite genes to the different stressors. In addition, several genes in the serotonergic, dopaminergic and gaba-related pathways were investigated. These genes revealed that rearing in pairs of two and opening of the tank lid affected anorexigenic genes, such as cart and cck, which were not changed by air exposure or feed rewarding. Moreover, distress and eustress led to limited, but distinguishable gene expression pattern changes in the investigated brain regions.