Lichen sclerosus (LS) is an inflammatory skin disease that usually involves the anogenital area. All patients with symptoms or signs suspicious of lichen sclerosus should be seen at least once initially by a physician with a special interest in the disease in order to avoid delay in diagnosis, as early treatment may cure the disease in some and reduce or prevent scarring. The diagnosis is made clinically in most cases. Biopsies should only be performed under certain circumstances. The gold standard for treatment remains potent to very potent topical steroids; however, mild and moderate disease in boys and men may be cured by circumcision. Certain triggers should be avoided.
Recently it was shown that a second GnRH system exists in primates. This study was conducted to investigate whether or not the receptor specific for GnRH type II is expressed in human endometrial and ovarian cancer cells and whether or not GnRH-II has effects on tumor cell proliferation. Expression of GnRH-II receptor mRNA in endometrial and ovarian cancer cell lines was demonstrated using RT-PCR and Southern blot analysis. The proliferation of these cell lines was dose- and time-dependently reduced by native GnRH-II. These effects were significantly more potent than the anitproliferative effects of equimolar doses of GnRH-I agonist Triptorelin (p<0.001). In the GnRH-II receptor positive but GnRH-I receptor negative ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV-3 native GnRH-II but not GnRH-I agonist Triptorelin had antiproliferative effects.
Approximately 80% of human ovarian and endometrial cancers and 50% of breast cancers express GnRH and its receptor as part of an autocrine regulatory system. After binding of its ligand the tumor GnRH receptor couples to G-protein αi and activates a variety of intracellular signaling mechanisms.(1) Through activation of a protein tyrosine phosphatase, autophosphorylation of growth factor receptors is reverted leading to an inhibition of mitogenic signaling and reduced cell proliferation. (2) Through activation of nuclear factor kappa B antiapoptotic mechanisms are induced protecting tumor cells from apoptosis induced, for example, by doxorubicin. (3) Through activation of the Jun kinase pathway AP-1 is induced, leading to cell cycle arrest in the G 0 /G 1 phase. It seems reasonable to speculate that this system enables the tumor cell to reduce proliferation and to activate repair mechanisms while being protected simultaneously from apoptosis. Interestingly, GnRH antagonists show the same activity in this system as agonists, indicating that the dichotomy GnRH agonist-GnRH antagonist defined in the pituitary gonadotrope is not valid for the tumor GnRH system. Recently, a second type of GnRH receptor, specific for GnRH-II, has been identified in ovarian and endometrial cancers, which transmits significantly stronger antiproliferative effects than the GnRH-I receptor. GnRH antagonists have agonistic effects on this type II receptor. In animal models of human cancers, GnRH antagonists had stronger antitumor effects than GnRH agonists. Therefore, we performed a phase II clinical trial with the GnRH antagonist, cetrorelix (10 mg/day), in patients with ovarian or mullerian carcinoma refractory to platinum chemotherapy. Of 17 evaluable patients treated with cetrorelix, 3 obtained a partial remission (18%) which lasted for 2 to 6 months. Furthermore, 6 patients experienced disease stabilization (35%) for up to 1 year. In this very refractory patient population (median number of prior chemotherapies = 3) these results are quite remarkable when compared with palliative chemotherapy. In addition, cytotoxic GnRH analogs have been developed, where for example doxorubicin was covalently coupled to GnRH analogs. These compounds have superior antitumor effects in cancers expressing GnRH receptors as compared with native doxorubicin and allow for a targeted cytotoxic chemotherapy of gynecologic and breast cancers.
When implemented into clinical practice, the panel recommendations may improve safety and effectiveness of OPS. The attendees agreed that there is a need for prospective multicenter studies to optimize patient selection and for standardized criteria to qualify and accredit OPS training centers.
Physiological regeneration of colonic epithelium entails proliferation at the crypt base and cell loss by shedding or cell death. The aim of this study was to localise and assess the rate of apoptosis in normal and neoplastic colonic epithelium with respect to zones of proliferation. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) was chosen as a model to study neoplastic transformation of colonic mucosa at an early stage. Apoptotic cells were detected in situ by TdT-mediated biotin-dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) in parallel to cells in cycle determined by immunohistochemistry using the monoclonal antibody MiB-1. By detection of genomic fragmentation, two different patterns of enterocytic apoptosis emerged: (a) apoptotic bodies being engulfed by adjacent epithelial cells, and (b) apoptotic cells with only subtle morphological changes being extruded into the gut lumen. The engulfment pattern was seen predominantly in the crypts of the normal colonic mucosa and, although very rare, was clearly confined to the basal proliferation compartment. The extrusion pattern was restricted to the luminal mucosal surface. Adenomas of FAP showed highly increased numbers of apoptotic bodies, which were scattered throughout the transformed mucosa. Both patterns of apoptosis were topographically intermingled although the extrusion pattern prevailed at the luminal adenoma surfaces. Whereas cells in cycle were somewhat more numerous in the upper parts of the crypts, apoptosis occurred with increased frequency at sites beneath the proliferation maximum suggesting an inverted direction of epithelial cell migration in adenomas. These results suggest two distinct routes towards enterocytic apoptosis in the colonic mucosa leading to engulfment or extrusion of dying cells. Adenomatous transformation ofcolon epithelium is associated with a considerable increase of the cellular turnover rate and with a severe disturbance of the microtopographical localisation of birth and death of enterocytes.
PurposeIndications for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have broadened to include the risk reducing setting and locally advanced tumors, which resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of NSM. The Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on NSM and immediate reconstruction was held to address a variety of questions in clinical practice and research based on published evidence and expert panel opinion.MethodsThe panel consisted of 44 breast surgeons from 14 countries across four continents with a background in gynecology, general or reconstructive surgery and a practice dedicated to breast cancer, as well as a patient advocate. Panelists presented evidence summaries relating to each topic for debate during the in-person consensus conference. The iterative process in question development, voting, and wording of the recommendations followed the modified Delphi methodology.ResultsConsensus recommendations were reached in 35, majority recommendations in 24, and no recommendations in the remaining 12 questions. The panel acknowledged the need for standardization of various aspects of NSM and immediate reconstruction. It endorsed several oncological contraindications to the preservation of the skin and nipple. Furthermore, it recommended inclusion of patients in prospective registries and routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Considerable heterogeneity in breast reconstruction practice became obvious during the conference.ConclusionsIn case of conflicting or missing evidence to guide treatment, the consensus conference revealed substantial disagreement in expert panel opinion, which, among others, supports the need for a randomized trial to evaluate the safest and most efficacious reconstruction techniques.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-4937-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.