BackgroundIn subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), titrating sedation to find a balance between wakefulness with the ability to perform valid clinical examinations on the one hand, and deep sedation to minimize secondary brain damage, on the other hand, is challenging. However, data on this topic are scarce, and current guidelines do not provide recommendations for sedation protocols in SAH.MethodsWe designed a web-based, cross-sectional survey for German-speaking neurointensivists to map current standards for the indication and monitoring of sedation, duration of prolonged sedation, and biomarkers for the withdrawal of sedation.ResultsOverall, 17.4% (37/213) of neurointensivists answered the questionnaire. Most of the participants were neurologists (54.1%, 20/37) and exhibited a long-standing experience in intensive care medicine (14.9 years, SD 8.3). Among indications for prolonged sedation in SAH, the control of intracranial pressure (ICP) (94.6%) and status epilepticus (91.9%) were most significant. With regard to further complications in the course of the disease, therapy refractory ICP (45.9%, 17/37) and radiographic surrogates of elevated ICP, such as parenchymal swelling (35.1%, 13/37), were the most relevant topics for experts. Regular awakening trials were performed by 62.2% of neurointensivists (23/37). All participants used clinical examination for the therapeutic monitoring of sedation depth. A total of 83.8% of neurointensivists (31/37) used methods based on electroencephalography. As a mean duration of sedation before attempting an awakening trial in patients with unfavorable biomarkers, neurointensivists suggested 4.5 days (SD 1.8) for good-grade SAH and 5.6 days (SD 2.8) for poor-grade SAH, respectively. Many experts performed cranial imaging before the definite withdrawal of sedation [84.6% (22/26)], and 63.6% (14/22) of the participants required an absence of herniation, space-occupying lesions, or global cerebral edema. The values of ICP tolerated for definite withdrawal were smaller compared to that of awakening trials (17.3 mmHg vs. 22.1 mmHg), and patients were required to stay below the threshold value for several hours (21.3 h, SD 10.7).ConclusionDespite the paucity of clear recommendations for sedation management in SAH in the pre-existing literature, we found some level of agreement indicating clinical efficacy for certain clinical practices. By mapping the current standard, this survey may help to identify controversial aspects in the clinical care of SAH and thereby streamline future research.

Temporalis muscle (TM) atrophy has emerged as a potential biomarker for muscle wasting. However, its diagnostic utility as a monitoring tool in intensive care remains uncertain. Hence, the objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of sequential ultrasound- and computed tomography (CT)-based measurements of TM thickness (TMT). With a prospective observational design, we included 40 patients without preexisting sarcopenia admitted to a neurointensive care unit. TMT measurements, performed upon admission and serially every 3–4 days, were correlated with rectus femoris muscle thickness (RFT) ultrasound measurements. Interrater reliability was assessed by Bland Altmann plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Analysis of variance was performed in subgroups to evaluate differences in the standard error of measurement (SEM). RFT decline was paralleled by ultrasound- as well as CT-based TMT measurements (TMT to RFT: r = 0.746, p < 0.001; CT-based TMT to ultrasound-based RFT: r = 0.609, p < 0.001). ICC was 0.80 [95% CI 0.74, 0.84] for ultrasound-based assessment and 0.90 [95% CI 0.88, 0.92] for CT-based TMT measurements. Analysis of variance for BMI, Heckmatt score, fluid balance, and agitation showed no evidence of measurement errors in these subgroups. This study demonstrates the clinical feasibility and utility of ultrasound- and CT-based TMT measurements for the assessment of muscle wasting.