In current applied radiobiology, there exists a tremendous effort in basic and translational research to identify novel treatment modalities combining ionizing radiation with anticancer agents. This is mainly due to the highly improved molecular understanding of intrinsic radioresistance and the profiling of cellular stress responses to irradiation during recent years. Ionizing radiation not only damages DNA but also affects multiple cellular components that induce a multi-layered stress response. The treatment responses can be restricted to the individual cell level but might also be part of an intercellular stress communication network. Both DNA damage-induced signaling (which results in cell cycle arrest and induction of the DNA-repair machinery) and also ionizing radiation-induced signal transduction cascades, which are generated at cellular sites distant from and independent of DNA-damage, represent interesting targets for anticancer treatment modalities to sensitize for ionizing radiation. Due to the lack of molecular knowledge classic radiobiology assembled the cellular and tissue responses into four groups (4 R's of radiotherapy) which describe biological factors influencing the treatment response to fractionated radiotherapy. These classic 4 R's are Repair, Reassortment, Repopulation and Reoxygenation. With the tremendous progress in molecular oncology we now begin to understand theses factors on the molecular level. At the same time this classification may guide modern molecular radiobiologists to identify novel pharmaceuticals and antisignaling agents which can modulate the treatment response to irradiation. In this review we describe current approaches to sensitize tumor cells with novel anticancer agents along the lines of these 4 R's.
Recent years have seen major breakthroughs in genome-engineering systems, such as transposon-mediated gene delivery systems and CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome-editing tools. In these systems, transient expression of auxiliary genes is responsible for permanent genomic modification. For both systems, it would be valuable to select for cells that are likely to undergo stable genome modification. Importantly, in particular for clinical applications of genome-engineered cell products, it will also be of importance to remove those cells that, due to random vector integration, display an unwanted stable expression of the auxiliary gene. Here, we develop a traceless selection system that on the one hand allows efficient enrichment of modified cells, and on the other hand can be used to select against cells that retain expression of the auxiliary gene. The value of this system to produce highly enriched-auxiliary gene-free cell products is demonstrated.
The screening for treatment-induced enzyme activities offers the opportunity to discover important regulatory mechanisms and the identification of potential targets for anti-cancer therapies. A novel screening technique was applied to screen substrate peptide sequences for proteolytic activities up- or down-regulated by ionizing radiation in tumor cells. One specific substrate sequence was cleaved in control cell extracts but to a smaller extent in irradiated cell extracts and investigated in detail. Based on protease-class-specific inhibitory studies and cleavage site analysis a potent warhead-inhibitor was synthesized and used to identify the proteasome as the protease of interest. The investigated sequence shows high homology to a regulatory site of nucleoporin 50, an element of the nuclear pore complex, and site specific cleavage of nucleoporin 50 was determined in vitro suggesting a novel link between the ionizing radiation-regulated proteasome and nuclear protein shuttling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.