Preventive home visitation programs appear to be effective, provided the interventions are based on multidimensional geriatric assessment and include multiple follow-up home visits and target persons at lower risk for death. Benefits on survival were seen in young-old rather than old-old populations.

Aims While the prognosis of patients presenting with de novo atrial fibrillation (AF) during the acute phase of myocardial infarction has been controversially discussed, it seems intuitive that affected individuals have an increased risk for both thrombo-embolic events and mortality. However, profound data on long-term outcome of this highly vulnerable patient population are not available in current literature. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of de novo AF and associated anti-thrombotic treatment strategies on the patient outcome from a long-term perspective. Methods and results Patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, treated at the Medical University of Vienna, were enrolled within a clinical registry and screened for the development of de novo AF. After discharge, participants were followed prospectively over a median time of 8.6 years. Primary study endpoint was defined as cardiovascular mortality. Out of 1372 enrolled individuals 149 (10.9%) developed de novo AF during the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction. After a median follow-up time of 8.6 years, a total of 418 (30.5%) died due to cardiovascular causes, including 93 (62.4%) in the de novo AF subgroup. We found that de novo AF was significantly associated with long-term cardiovascular mortality with an adjusted HR of 1.45 (95% CI 1.19–2.57; P < 0.001). While patients with de novo AF were less likely to receive a triple anti-thrombotic therapy as compared to patients with pre-existing AF at time of discharge, this therapeutic approach showed a strong and inverse association with mortality in de novo AF, with an adj. HR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.45–0.92; P = 0.012). Conclusion De novo AF was independently associated with a poor prognosis with a 67% increased risk of long-term cardiovascular mortality. Intensified anti-thrombotic treatment in this high-risk patient population might be considered.

No abstract

Background. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) constitutes a global health issue. While proinflammatory cytokines proved to have a pivotal role in the development and progression of HFrEF, less attention has been paid to the cellular immunity. Regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) seem to have an important role in the induction and maintenance of immune homeostasis. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of Tregs on the outcome in HFrEF. Methods. We prospectively enrolled 112 patients with HFrEF and performed flow cytometry for cell phenotyping. Individuals were stratified in ischemic (iHFrEF, n=57) and nonischemic etiology (niHFrEF, n=55). Cox regression hazard analysis was used to assess the influence of Tregs on survival. Results. Comparing patients with iHFrEF to niHFrEF, we found a significantly lower fraction of Tregs within lymphocytes in the ischemic subgroup (0.42% vs. 0.56%; p=0.009). After a mean follow-up time of 4.5 years, 32 (28.6%) patients died due to cardiovascular causes. We found that Tregs were significantly associated with cardiovascular survival in the entire study cohort with an adjusted HR per one standard deviation (1-SD) of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.39-0.92; p=0.017). A significant inverse association of Tregs and cardiovascular mortality in patients with iHFrEF with an adj. HR per 1-SD of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.36-0.96; p=0.034) has been observed, while this association was not evident in the nonischemic subgroup (adj. HR per 1-SD of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.17-2.31); p=0.486). Conclusion. Our results indicate a potential influence of Tregs in the pathogenesis and progression of iHFrEF, fostering the implication of cellular immunity in iHFrEF pathophysiology and proving Tregs as a predictor for long-term survival among iHFrEF patients. A preview of this study has been presented at a meeting of the European Society of Cardiology earlier this year.

No abstract

Background: GDF-15 (growth/differentiation factor 15) is induced by myocardial stretch, volume overload, inflammation and oxidative stress. Its expression is tightly linked with cardiovascular events as well as the risk for major bleeding and all-cause mortality. The present study aimed to elucidate the prognostic potential of GDF-15 in patients after cardiac surgery. Methods: 504 patients undergoing elective cardiac valve and/or coronary artery bypass graft surgery were prospectively enrolled. GDF-15 levels were measured prior surgery to evaluate the impact on bleeding events, thromboembolic events and mortality. Results: Preoperative GDF-15 was associated with the primary endpoint of intra- and postoperative red blood cell transfusion (for bleeding risk factors adjusted [adj] OR [odds ratio] per 1-SD [standard deviation] of 1.62 [95%CI:1.31-2.00]; p<0.001). Higher concentrations of GDF-15 were observed in patients reaching the secondary endpoint of major or clinically relevant minor bleeding (for bleeding risk factors adj. OR per 1-SD of 1.70 [95%CI:1.05-2.75]; p=0.030) during the 1st postoperative year, but not for thromboembolic events. GDF-15 was a predictor for cardiovascular mortality (for comorbidities adj. HR [hazard ratio] per 1-SD of 1.67 [95%CI:1.23-2.27]; p=0.001) and all-cause mortality (for comorbidities adj. HR per 1-SD of 1.55 [95%CI:1.19-2.01]; p=0.001). A combined risk model of GDF-15 and EuroSCORE II outperformed the EuroSCORE II alone for long-term survival (c-index: 0.75 [95%CI: 0.70-0.80], p=0.046; net reclassification improvement: 33.6%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Preoperative GDF-15 concentration is an independent predictor for intra- and postoperative major bleeding, major bleeding during the first year and for long-term cardiovascular or all-cause mortality after cardiac surgery.

PRCA due a PVB19 infection of the BM may persist over a long-time, despite prolonged administration of various IVIG regimen and tapering of GvHD-directed therapy. The case emphasizes the importance of PVB19 monitoring in heavily pre-treated haematological patients. Currently, PVB19-directed treatment options are extremely limited and optimized therapeutic strategies are urgently needed.

No abstract