NF-kappa B/Rel transcription factors control apoptosis, also known as programmed cell death. This control is crucial for oncogenesis, cancer chemo-resistance and for antagonizing tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha)-induced killing. With regard to TNFalpha, the anti-apoptotic activity of NF-kappa B involves suppression of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) cascade. Using an unbiased screen, we have previously identified Gadd45 beta/Myd118, a member of the Gadd45 family of inducible factors, as a pivotal mediator of this suppressive activity of NF-kappa B. However, the mechanisms by which Gadd45 beta inhibits JNK signalling are not understood. Here, we identify MKK7/JNKK2--a specific and essential activator of JNK--as a target of Gadd45 beta, and in fact, of NF-kappa B itself. Gadd45 beta binds to MKK7 directly and blocks its catalytic activity, thereby providing a molecular link between the NF-kappa B and JNK pathways. Importantly, Gadd45 beta is required to antagonize TNFalpha-induced cytotoxicity, and peptides disrupting the Gadd45 beta/MKK7 interaction hinder the ability of Gadd45 beta, as well as of NF-kappa B, to suppress this cytotoxicity. These findings establish a basis for the NF-kappa B control of JNK activation and identify MKK7 as a potential target for anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer therapy.

The yeast CCR4 protein is required for the expression of a number of genes involved in nonfermentative growth, including glucose-repressible ADH2, and is the only known suppressor of mutations in the SPT6 and SPT10 genes, two genes which are believed to be involved in chromatin maintenance. We show here that although CCR4 did not bind DNA under the conditions tested, it was able to activate transcription when fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain. The transcriptional activation ability of CCR4, in contrast to that of many other activators, was glucose regulated. Two activation domains one of which was glucose responsive and encompassed a glutamine-proline-rich region similar to that found in other eukaryotic transcriptional factors were identified. The two transactivation regions, when separated from the leucine-rich repeat and the C terminus of CCR4, were unable to complement a defective ccr4 allele, suggesting that the leucine-rich repeat and the C terminus make contacts that link the activation regions to the proper gene context. Native immunoprecipitation of CCR4 revealed that CCR4 was complexed with at least four other proteins. The leucine-rich repeat of CCR4 was both necessary and sufficient for interaction with at least two of these factors. We propose that the leucine-rich repeat links CCR4 through its associated factors to its promoter context at ADH2 and other loci where it is required for proper transcriptional regulation.The general transcription factor CCR4 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for the transcription of a number of genes involved in nonfermentative growth, including that of the ADH2 gene (encoding the glucose-repressible alcohol dehydrogenase II) (11). Strains containing a deletion of CCR4 also fail to grow at elevated temperatures on a nonfermentative medium, consistent with the global role played by CCR4 under these growth conditions (14). Cells lacking CCR4, however, display other phenotypes, suggesting that CCR4 is involved in processes in addition to that of controlling nonfermentative growth. ccr4 mutations display a cold sensitivity phenotype under glucose growth conditions, a phenotype observed for defects in transcription initiation complex factors such as TFIIB, RPB1, SRB2, and SRB4 (1,2,29,30,33,34,37,41). In addition, CCR4 is required for the elevated expression at the ADH2 locus and for the altered transcriptional initiation at the his4-9128 locus that results from defects in the SPT6 and SPT10 genes (14). The SPT6 and SPT10 genes encode factors that are responsible for maintaining proper transcriptional control over a wide range of genes, and SPT6 has been specifically implicated in the maintenance of chromatin structure (11,26,27,39,40). spt6 mutations, moreover, suppress defects in the global transactivators SNF2 and SNF5, which are known to be involved in maintaining proper nucleosome positioning (5,6,19,28,43 known suppressor of spt6, may be functioning to counteract the repressive effects that SPT6 has on chromatin structure. CCR4 is also required for ADR...

CCR4, a poly(A) deadenylase of the exonuclease III family, is a component of the multiprotein CCR4-NOT complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that is involved in mRNA degradation. CCR4, unlike all other exonuclease III family members, contains a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) motif through which it makes contact to CAF1 and other factors. The LRR residues important in contacting CAF1 were identified by constructing 29 CCR4 mutations encompassing a majority (47 of 81) of residues interstitial to the conserved structural residues. Twohybrid and immunoprecipitation data revealed that physical contact between CAF1 and the LRR is blocked by mutation of just two ␣-helix/␤-helix strand loop residues linking the first and second repeats. In contrast, CAF16, a potential ligand of CCR4, was abrogated in its binding to the LRR by mutations in the N terminus of the second ␤-strand. The LRR domain was also found to contact the deadenylase domain of CCR4, and deletion of the LRR region completely inhibited CCR4 enzymatic activity. Mutations throughout the ␤-sheet surface of the LRR, including those that did not specifically interfere with contacts to CAF1 or CAF16, significantly reduced CCR4 deadenylase activity. These results indicate that the CCR4-LRR, in addition to binding to CAF1, plays an essential role in the CCR4 deadenylation of mRNA.

The yeast CCR4 protein is required for the expression of a number of genes involved in nonfermentative growth, including glucose-repressible ADH2, and is the only known suppressor of mutations in the SPT6 and SPT10 genes, two genes which are believed to be involved in chromatin maintenance. We show here that although CCR4 did not bind DNA under the conditions tested, it was able to activate transcription when fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain. The transcriptional activation ability of CCR4, in contrast to that of many other activators, was glucose regulated. Two activation domains one of which was glucose responsive and encompassed a glutamine-proline-rich region similar to that found in other eukaryotic transcriptional factors were identified. The two transactivation regions, when separated from the leucine-rich repeat and the C terminus of CCR4, were unable to complement a defective ccr4 allele, suggesting that the leucine-rich repeat and the C terminus make contacts that link the activation regions to the proper gene context. Native immunoprecipitation of CCR4 revealed that CCR4 was complexed with at least four other proteins. The leucine-rich repeat of CCR4 was both necessary and sufficient for interaction with at least two of these factors. We propose that the leucine-rich repeat links CCR4 through its associated factors to its promoter context at ADH2 and other loci where it is required for proper transcriptional regulation.