Objectives Conventional perfusion-weighted MRI sequences often provide poor spatial or temporal resolution. We aimed to overcome this problem in head and neck protocols using a golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) sequence. Methods We prospectively included 58 patients for examination on a 3.0-T MRI using a study protocol. GRASP (A) was applied to a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) with 135 reconstructed pictures and high temporal (2.5 s) and spatial resolution (0.94 × 0.94 × 3.00 mm). Additional sequences of matching temporal resolution (B: 2.5 s, 1.88 × 1.88 × 3.00 mm), with a compromise between temporal and spatial resolution (C: 7.0 s, 1.30 × 1.30 × 3.00 mm) and with matching spatial resolution (D: 145 s, 0.94 × 0.94 × 3.00 mm), were subsequently without GRASP. Instant inline-image reconstructions (E) provided one additional series of averaged contrast information throughout the entire acquisition duration of A. Overall diagnostic image quality, edge sharpness and contrast of soft tissues, vessels and lesions were subjectively rated using 5-point Likert scales. Objective image quality was measured as contrast-to-noise ratio in D and E. Results Overall, the anatomic and pathologic image quality was substantially better with the GRASP sequence for the temporally (A/B/C, all p < 0.001) and spatially resolved comparisons (D/E, all p < 0.002 except lesion edge sharpness with p = 0.291). Image artefacts were also less likely to occur with GRASP. Differences in motion, aliasing and truncation were mainly significant, but pulsation and fat suppression were comparable. In addition, the contrast-to-noise ratio of E was significantly better than that of D (pD-E < 0.001). Conclusions High temporal and spatial resolution can be obtained synchronously using a GRASP-VIBE technique for perfusion evaluation in head and neck MRI. Key Points • Golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) sampling allows for temporally resolved dynamic acquisitions with a very high image quality. • Very low-contrast structures in the head and neck region can benefit from using the GRASP sequence. • Inline-image reconstruction of dynamic and static series from one single acquisition can replace the conventional combination of two acquisitions, thereby saving examination time.
The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive cases in tonsillar carcinomas and investigate its development over the last decade. Further aim was to show the oncologic results in accord to HPV status and various treatment modalities. A retrospective study was conducted between 2000 and 2012 and included 275 patients treated for tonsillar carcinoma. P16 immunohistochemistry was used as a surrogate marker for HPV-associated carcinogenesis. A total of 101 (36.7%) patients proved to be p16 positive and 174 p16 negative. 80.2% of the p16-positive cases presented with T1-2 tumor. Of the early-stage patients, 79% of the p16-positive and 52.3% of the p16-negative presented with lymph node metastases. The percentage of p16-positive patients increased from 23.2% in the period 2005–2007 to 58.6% in the period 2010–2012 in the whole population and from 30.9% to 76.9% in T1-2 carcinomas. Early T-category p16-positive carcinomas had significantly better disease-specific survival (92.4% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.007) and overall survival (OS, 79.6% vs. 54.3%, P < 0.001) compared to p16-negative tumors. This study showed an increase in the percentage of p16-positive patients in tonsillar carcinoma from 23.2% in the years between 2005 and 2007 to 58.6% between 2010 and 2012. The majority (80.2%) of p16-positive patients presented with early T-category tumor but most of these (79.0%) had also lymph node metastases. Nevertheless, p16-positive patients had excellent oncologic results after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy and could be considered for de-escalation of treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.