No abstract

Murine osteotomy and fracture models have become the standard to study molecular mechanisms of bone healing. Because there is little information whether the healing of osteotomies differs from that of fractures, we herein studied in mice the healing of femur osteotomies compared to femur fractures. Twenty CD-1 mice underwent a standardized open femur osteotomy. Another 20 mice received a standardized open femur fracture. Stabilization was performed by an intramedullary screw. Bone healing was studied by micro-CT, biomechanical, histomorphometric and protein expression analyses. Osteotomies revealed a significantly lower biomechanical stiffness compared to fractures. Micro-CT showed a reduced bone/tissue volume within the callus of the osteotomies. Histomorphometric analyses demonstrated also a significantly lower amount of osseous tissue in the callus of osteotomies (26% and 88% after 2 and 5 weeks) compared to fractures (50% and 100%). This was associated with a delayed remodeling. Western blot analyses demonstrated comparable BMP-2 and BMP-4 expression, but higher levels of collagen-2, CYR61 and VEGF after osteotomy. Therefore, we conclude that open femur osteotomies in mice show a markedly delayed healing when stabilized less rigidly with an intramedullary screw. This should be considered when choosing a model for studying the mechanisms of bone healing in mice.

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) affects mainly elderly patients. To this day, it is unclear whether comorbidities influence treatment success. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of comorbidities on the treatment effectiveness in symptomatic LSS. Methods:We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and reviewed prospective or retrospective studies from Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL from inception to May 2020, including adult patients with LSS undergoing surgical or conservative treatment. Main outcomes were satisfaction, functional and symptoms improvement, and adverse events (AE). Proportions of outcomes within two subgroups of a comorbidity were compared with risk ratio (RR) as summary measure. Availability of ≥ 3 studies for the same subgroup and outcome was required for meta-analysis.Results: Of 72 publications, 51 studies, mostly assessing surgery, there was no evidence reported that patients with comorbidities were less satisfied compared to patients without comorbidities (RR 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.45, 2 94%), but they had an increased risk for AE (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.01, 2 72%). A limited number of studies found no influence of comorbidities on functional and symptoms improvement. Older age did not affect satisfaction, symptoms and functional improvement, and AE (age > 80 years RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.52, 2 60%). Diabetes was associated with more AE (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.47, 2 58%). Conclusion:In patients with LSS and comorbidities (in particular diabetes), a higher risk for AE should be considered in the treatment decision. Older age alone was not associated with an increased risk for AE, less functional and symptoms improvement, and less treatment satisfaction.