In this paper, we describe an initial exploratory study designed to compare the outcomes of online listening and online text-based tasks in the context of the study of Italian at The University of Melbourne. Our findings allow us to characterise online listening and online reading as a qualitative difference between deep and surface approaches to learning. Online listening seems to promote an integrative orientation and heighten students' desire to deconstruct and understand texts. There also appears to be higher vocabulary acquisition and knowledge retention with online listening tasks.
IntroductionRubin and Thompson (1994) assert that "[l]istening, quite possibly, is the most important of the language skills, since people spend approximately 60% of their time listening" (1994:85). While the cardinal position of listening as one of the key linguistic abilities is clearly recognised, this is not reflected in research on listening.Vandergrift (1997, 1999, 2006) has repeatedly called attention to this fact. He notes most recently, for instance, that "[t]he extent to which listening ability in a second language (L2) is a function of the transfer of first language (L1) listening abilities or of L2 proficiency has not heretofore been examined" (Vandergrift 2006:6). In an earlier contribution, he described listening, conceptualised as a reception strategy, as the "Cinderella of communication strategies; [it has] received little research attention" (Vandergrift 1997:494). Similarly, there is a notable lack of research which explores the effects online listening may have on L2 proficiency and, of particular relevance to the present study, cross-modality effects, i.e. effects of listening on other linguistic abilities such as writing or speaking. Clearly, this is due to relatively recent developments in technology which facilitate access to online audio materials and to tools which allow for straightforward creation of learning tasks (see Rizzi and Absalom 2007).Cross-modality effects on second/foreign language competency, which refer to the impact one type of task can have on difference linguistic abilities (e.g. how a reading task affects oral proficiency), have emerged as an issue in the last ten years with a strong focus on the relationship between online text-based activities (either synchronous -chatrooms or asynchronous -email exchanges) and face-to-face oral interaction. Studies have described the following positive types of effects of the online environment:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.