Background: Seizures are common in patients with dementia but precise epidemiologic data of epilepsy in neurodegenerative dementia is lacking. Objective: The first aim of the study was to investigate prevalence and clinical characteristics of epilepsy in a large cohort of patients with neurodegenerative dementias. Subsequently, we explored clinical, neuropsychological, and quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) data of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with epilepsy (AD-EPI) as compared to AD patients without epilepsy (AD-CTR). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with a diagnosis of a neurodegenerative dementia and a clinically diagnosed epilepsy that required antiepileptic drugs (AED). All patients underwent baseline comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. A follow-up of at least one year was requested to confirm the dementia diagnosis. In AD patients, qEEG power band analysis was performed. AD-CTR and AD-EPI patients were matched for age, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and gender. Results: Thirty-eight out of 2,054 neurodegenerative dementia patients had epilepsy requiring AED. The prevalence of epilepsy was 1.82% for AD, 1.28% for the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), 2.47% for dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and 12% for primary progressive aphasia. Epilepsy were more drug-responsive in AD than in non-AD dementias. Finally, no significant differences were found in neuropsychological and qEEG data between AD-EPI and AD-CTR patients. Conclusion: In our cohort, AD, FTD, and DLB dementias have similar prevalence of epilepsy, even if AD patients were more responsive to AED. Moreover, AD-EPI patients did not have significant clinical, neuropsychological qEEG differences compared with AD-CTR patients.

A BS TRACT: Background: Dopamine transporter single photon-emission computed tomography (DAT-SPECT) is the strongest risk factor for phenoconversion in patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement (REM)sleep behavior disorder (iRBD). However, it might be used as a second-line stratification tool in clinical trials, because it is expensive and mini-invasive. Objective: Aim of the study is to investigate whether other cost-effective and non-invasive biomarkers may be proposed as first-line stratification tools. Methods: Forty-seven consecutive iRBD patients (68.53 AE 7.16 years, 40 males) underwent baseline clinical and neuropsychological assessment, olfaction test, resting electroencephalogram (EEG), and DAT-SPECT. All patients underwent 6 month-based clinical follow-up to investigate the emergence of parkinsonism and/or dementia. Survival analysis and Cox regression were used to estimate conversion risk. Results: Seventeen patients developed an overt synucleinopathy (eight Parkinsonism and nine dementia) 32.8 AE 22 months after diagnosis. The strongest risk factors were putamen specific to non-displaceable binding ratio (SBR) (hazard ratio [HR], 7.3), attention/working memory cognitive function (NPS-AT/WM) (HR, 5.9), EEG occipital mean frequency (HR, 2.7) and clinical motor assessment (HR, 2.3). On multivariate Cox-regression analysis, only putamen SBR and NPS-AT/WM significantly contributed to the model (HR, 6.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-19.8). At post-hoc analysis, the trail-making test B (TMT-B) was the single most efficient first-line stratification tool that allowed to reduce the number of eligible subjects to 76.6% (sensitivity 1, specificity 0.37). Combining TMT-B and DAT-SPECT further reduced the sample to 66% (sensitivity 0.88, specificity 0.47). Conclusion:The TMT-B seems to be a cost-effective and efficient first-line screening tool, to be used to select patients that deserve DAT-SPECT as second-line screening tool for disease-modifying clinical trials.

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a heterogeneous condition. Idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) can be associated with MCI (MCI-RBD). Objective: To investigate neuropsychological and brain metabolism features of patients with MCI-RBD by comparison with matched MCI-AD patients. To explore their predictive value toward conversion to a full-blown neurodegenerative disease. Methods: Seventeen MCI-RBD patients (73.6±6.5 years) were enrolled. Thirty-four patients with MCI-AD were matched for age (74.8±4.4 years), Mini-Mental State Exam score and education with a case-control criterion. All patients underwent a neuropsychological assessment and brain 18F-FDG-PET. Images were compared between groups to identify hypometabolic volumes of interest (MCI-RBD-VOI and MCI-AD-VOI). The dependency of whole-brain scaled metabolism levels in MCI-RBD-VOI and MCI-AD-VOI on neuropsychological test scores was explored with linear regression analyses in both groups, adjusting for age and education. Survival analysis was performed to investigate VOIs phenoconversion prediction power. Results: MCI-RBD group scored lower in executive functions and higher in verbal memory compared to MCI-AD group. Also, compared with MCI-AD, MCI-RBD group showed relative hypometabolism in a posterior brain area including cuneus, precuneus, and occipital regions while the inverse comparison revealed relative hypometabolism in the hippocampus/parahippocampal areas in MCI-AD group. MCI-RBD-VOI metabolism directly correlated with executive functions in MCI-RBD (p = 0.04). MCI-AD-VOI metabolism directly correlated with verbal memory in MCI-AD (p = 0.001). MCI-RBD-VOI metabolism predicted (p = 0.03) phenoconversion to an alpha-synucleinopathy. MCI-AD-VOI metabolism showed a trend (p = 0.07) in predicting phenoconversion to dementia. Conclusion: MCI-RBD and MCI-AD showed distinct neuropsychological and brain metabolism profiles, that may be helpful for both diagnosis and prognosis purposes.

Background: Cognitive impairment is frequent in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and several neurotransmitter changes have been reported since the time of diagnosis, although seldom investigated altogether in the same patient cohort. Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the association between neurotransmitter impairment, brain metabolism, and cognition in a cohort of de novo, drug-naïve PD patients. Methods: We retrospectively selected 95 consecutive drug-naïve PD patients (mean age 71.89±7.53) undergoing at the time of diagnosis a brain [18F]FDG-PET as a marker of brain glucose metabolism and proxy measure of neurodegeneration, [123I]FP-CIT-SPECT as a marker and dopaminergic deafferentation in the striatum and frontal cortex, as well as a marker of serotoninergic deafferentation in the thalamus, and quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) as an indirect measure of cholinergic deafferentation. Patients also underwent a complete neuropsychological test battery. Results: Positive correlations were observed between (i) executive functions and left cerebellar cortex metabolism, (ii) prefrontal dopaminergic tone and working memory (r = 0.304, p = 0.003), (iii) qEEG slowing in the posterior leads and both memory (r = 0.299, p = 0.004) and visuo-spatial functions (r = 0.357, p <  0.001). Conclusions: In subjects with PD, the impact of regional metabolism and diffuse projection systems degeneration differs across cognitive domains. These findings suggest possible tailored approaches to the treatment of cognitive deficits in PD.

Background Idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) represents the prodromal stage of α‐synucleinopathies. Reliable biomarkers are needed to predict phenoconversion. Objective The aim was to derive and validate a brain glucose metabolism pattern related to phenoconversion in iRBD (iRBDconvRP) using spatial covariance analysis (Scaled Subprofile Model and Principal Component Analysis [SSM‐PCA]). Methods Seventy‐six consecutive iRBD patients (70 ± 6 years, 15 women) were enrolled in two centers and prospectively evaluated to assess phenoconversion (30 converters, 73 ± 6 years, 14 Parkinson's disease and 16 dementia with Lewy bodies, follow‐up time: 21 ± 14 months; 46 nonconverters, 69 ± 6 years, follow‐up time: 33 ± 19 months). All patients underwent [18F]FDG‐PET (18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emitting tomography) to investigate brain glucose metabolism at baseline. SSM‐PCA was applied to obtain the iRBDconvRP; nonconverter patients were considered as the reference group. Survival analysis and Cox regression were applied to explore prediction power. Results First, we derived and validated two distinct center‐specific iRBDconvRP that were comparable and significantly able to predict phenoconversion. Then, SSM‐PCA was applied to the whole set, identifying the iRBDconvRP. The iRBDconvRP included positive voxel weights in cerebellum; brainstem; anterior cingulate cortex; lentiform nucleus; and middle, mesial temporal, and postcentral areas. Negative voxel weights were found in posterior cingulate, precuneus, middle frontal gyrus, and parietal areas. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.85 (sensitivity: 87%, specificity: 72%), discriminating converters from nonconverters. The iRBDconvRP significantly predicted phenoconversion (hazard ratio: 7.42, 95% confidence interval: 2.6–21.4). Conclusions We derived and validated an iRBDconvRP to efficiently discriminate converter from nonconverter iRBD patients. [18F]FDG‐PET pattern analysis has potential as a phenoconversion biomarker in iRBD patients. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Background: Neuropsychological assessment is still the basis for the first evaluation of patients with cognitive complaints. The Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) generates several indices that could have different accuracy in the differential diagnosis between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other disorders. Objective: In a consecutive series of naturalistic patients, the accuracy of the FCSRT indices in differentiating patients with either mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD or AD dementia from other competing conditions was evaluated. Methods: We evaluated the accuracy of the seven FCSRT indices in differentiating patients with AD from other competing conditions in 434 consecutive outpatients, either at the MCI or at the early dementia stage. We analyzed these data through the receiver operating characteristics curve, and we then generated the odds-ratio map of the two indices with the best discriminative value between pairs of disorders. Results: The immediate and the delayed free total recall, the immediate total recall, and the index of sensitivity of cueing were the most useful indices and allowed to distinguish AD from dementia with Lewy bodies and psychiatric conditions with very high accuracy. Accuracy was instead moderate in distinguishing AD from behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, vascular cognitive impairment, and other conditions. Conclusion: By using odd-ratio maps and comparison-customized cut-off scores, we confirmed that the FCSRT represents a useful tool to characterize the memory performance of patients with MCI and thus to assist the clinician in the diagnosis process, though with different accuracy values depending on the clinical hypothesis.

No abstract

No abstract