Endothelial-immune cell cross-talk goes well beyond leukocyte and lymphocyte trafficking, since immune cells are able to intimately regulate vessel formation and function. Here we review the evidence that most immune cells are capable of polarization towards a dichotomous activity either inducing or inhibiting angiogenesis. In addition to the well-known roles of tumor associated macrophages, we find that neutrophils, myeloid-derived suppressor and dendritic cells clearly have the potential for influencing tumor angiogenesis. Further, the physiological functions of NK cells suggest that these cells may also show a potentially important role in pro- or anti-angiogenesis regulation within the tumor microenvironment. At the same time many angiogenic factors influence the activity and function of immune cells that generally favor tumor survival and tolerance. Thus the immune system itself represents a major pharmaceutical target and links angiogenesis inhibition to immunotherapy.

Purpose: We have shown previously that the MHC class II^negative murine TS/A adenocarcinoma is rejected in vivo if induced to express MHC class II molecules by transfection of the MHC class II transactivator CIITA. In this study, we explored the immunologic basis of tumor rejection and the correlation between histopathology of tumor tissue and immune rejection. Experimental Design: StableTS/A-CIITA transfectants were generated and injected into mice. In vivo cell depletion, immunohistochemistry of tumor tissues, and immune functional assays were done to assess the cellular and immunologic basis of rejection.

Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with mouse (m)TNF-a, targeted to tumor vasculature by the anti-ED-B fibronectin domain antibody L19(scFv) and combined with melphalan, induces a therapeutic immune response. Upon treatment, a highly efficient priming of CD4 + T cells and consequent activation and maturation of CD8 + CTL effectors is generated, as demonstrated by in vivo depletion and adoptive cell transfer experiments. Immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor tissue demonstrated massive infiltration of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells 6 days after treatment and much earlier in the anamnestic response to tumor challenge in cured mice. In fact, the curative treatment with L19mTNF-a and melphalan resulted in long-lasting antitumor immune memory, accompanied by a mixed Th1/Th2-type response and significant in vitro tumor-specific cytolytic activity. Finally, the combined treatment reduced the percentage and absolute number of CD4 + CD25 + regulatory T cells in the tumor-draining lymph nodes of mice responding to therapy, and this was associated with the establishment of protective immunity. These findings pave the way for alternative therapeutic strategies based on the targeted delivery of biological and pharmacological cytotoxic compounds that not only kill most of the tumor cells but, more importantly, trigger an effective and longlasting antitumor adaptive immune response.

In our study, we have investigated whether tumors of distinct histological origin can be rejected if expressing CIITA-driven MHC class II molecules. Moreover, we assessed whether antitumor lymphocytes generated by this approach could be used as an immunotherapeutic tool for established cancers. Stable CIITA-transfectants of C51colon adenocarcinoma, RENCA renal adenocarcinoma, WEHI-164 sarcoma as well as TS/A mammary adenocarcinoma were generated. Tumor cells transfectants were injected in vivo, and their growth kinetics and recipient's immune response were analyzed. Tumor rejection and/or retardation of growth was found for the first 3 CIITA-transfected tumor cell lines and confirmed for TS/A-CIITA. Animals rejecting CIITA-transfected tumors acquired specific immunological memory as demonstrated by resistance to challenge with parental tumors. Adoptive cell transfer experiments demonstrated that tumor immunity correlates with the efficient priming of CD4 1 T helper cells and the consequent activation of CD8 1 T lymphocytes. T cells from TS/A-vaccinated mice were used in an adoptive immunotherapy model of established tumors. The results showed the cure at early stages and significantly prolonged survival at later stages of tumor progression. Importantly, CD4 1 T cells were clearly superior to CD8 1 T cells in antitumor protective function. Interestingly, the protective phenotype was associated to both a Th1 and Th2 polarization of the immune effectors. These results establish the general application of our tumor vaccine model and disclose the additional application of this strategy for producing better lymphocyte effectors for adoptive antitumor immunotherapy.

In the present study, we investigated the possibility to use irradiated, non-replicating class II transcriptional activator (CIITA)-transfected tumor TS/A cells as a cell-based vaccine. Eighty-three percent of TS/A-CIITA-vaccinated mice were completely protected from tumor growth and the remaining 17% displayed significant reduction of tumor growth. In contrast, only 30% of mice injected with irradiated TS/A parental cells were protected from tumor growth, whereas the remaining 70% of animals remained unprotected. Immunity generated in the TS/A-CIITA-vaccinated mice correlated with an efficient priming of CD4(+) T cells and consequent triggering and maintenance of CD8(+) CTL effectors, as assessed by adoptive transfer assays. Important qualitative differences were observed between the two cell-based vaccines, as TS/A-CIITA-vaccinated mice developed a CTL response containing a large proportion of anti-gp70 AH1 epitope-specific cells, completely absent in TS/A-vaccinated mice, and a mixed T(h)1/T(h)2 type of response as opposed to a T(h)2 type of response in TS/A-vaccinated mice. Finally, in TS/A-CIITA-vaccinated mice, a statistically significant reduction in the percentage and absolute number of CD4(+) CD25(+) T regulatory cells as compared with those of untreated mice with growing tumors (P < 0.001) or mice vaccinated with TS/A parental cells were observed. These results let to envisage the use of CIITA-transfected non-replicating tumor cells as a vaccination strategy for prevention and, possibly, adjuvant immunotherapy in human settings.