Objective-PREDICT-HD is a large-scale international study of people with the Huntington Disease CAG-repeat expansion who are not yet diagnosed with HD. The objective of this study was to determine at what stage in the HD prodrome cognitive differences from CAG-normal controls can be reliably detected.Method-For each of 738 HD CAG-expanded participants, we computed estimated years to clinical diagnosis and probability of diagnosis in five years, based on age and CAG repeat expansion number (Langbehn, Brinkman, Falush, Paulsen, & Hayden, 2004). We then stratified the sample into groups: "NEAR," estimated to be ≤ 9 years, "MID," between 9 and 15 years, and "FAR," ≥ 15 years. The control sample included 168 CAG-normal participants. Nineteen cognitive tasks were used to assess attention, working memory, psychomotor functions, episodic memory, language, recognition of facial emotion, sensory-perceptual functions, and executive functions.Results-Compared to the controls, the NEAR group showed significantly poorer performance on nearly all, and the MID group on about half of the cognitive tests (p = 0.05, Cohen's d Near as large as −1.17, Mid as large as −0.61). One test even revealed significantly poorer performance in the FAR group (Cohen's d = −0.26). Individual tasks accounted for 0.2% to 9.7% of the variance in estimated proximity to diagnosis. Overall, the cognitive battery accounted for 34% of the variance; in comparison, the UHDRS Motor Score accounted for 11.7%. Conclusions-Neurocognitive tests are robust clinical indicators of the disease process prior to reaching criteria for motor diagnosis of HD.Keywords cognitive assessment; presymptomatic; neuropsychology; psychomotor; prediagnosis Huntington disease (HD) is a progressive, fatal, autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease that primarily affects movement, cognition, and psychiatric functions. Diagnosis of HD is based on the presence of unequivocal motor signs of HD, in conjunction with a positive genetic test for the HD CAG expansion or a confirmed family history of HD. Most people with the HD gene appear healthy throughout their youth and early adulthood, and then gradually develop signs and symptoms of HD, often leading to a diagnosis in middle age. The age of diagnosis varies in accordance with the number of CAG repeats on the expanded allele, although there is also substantial individual variability not accounted for by this genetic factor (Andrew et al., 1993;Gusella, MacDonald, Ambrose, & Duyao, 1993). A growing community of researchers is directing efforts at finding treatments to delay onset or slow the progression of early pathological changes in an attempt to reduce the tremendous personal and social costs of HD. Finding effective therapeutic or preventive treatments for HD depends critically on the ability to reliably and sensitively measure clinical signs of disease.Cognitive measures have excellent potential both for identifying individuals beginning to show subtle signs prior to the diagnosis of HD who might be suitable for clinical trials,...

Previous studies of emotion recognition suggest that detection of disgust relies on processing within the basal ganglia and insula. Research involving individuals with symptomatic and pre-diagnostic Huntington's disease (HD), a disease with known basal ganglia atrophy, has generally indicated a relative impairment in recognizing disgust. However, some data have suggested that recognition of other emotions (particularly fear and anger) may also be affected in HD, and a recent study found fear recognition deficits in the absence of other emotion-recognition impairments, including disgust. To further examine emotion recognition in HD, we administered a computerized facial emotion recognition task to 475 individuals with the HD CAG expansion and 57 individuals without. Logistic regression was used to examine associations of emotion recognition performance with estimated proximity to clinical diagnosis (based on CAG repeat length and current age) and striatal volumes. Recognition of anger, disgust, fear, sadness and surprise (but not happiness) was associated with estimated years to clinical diagnosis; performance was unrelated to striatal volumes. Compared to a CAG-normal control group, the CAG-expanded group demonstrated significantly less accurate recognition of all negative emotions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness). Additionally, participants with more pronounced motor signs of HD were significantly less accurate at recognizing negative emotions than were individuals with fewer motor signs. Findings indicate that recognition of all negative emotions declines early in the disease process, and poorer performance is associated with closer proximity to clinical diagnosis. In contrast to previous results, we found no evidence of relative impairments in recognizing disgust or fear, and no evidence to support a link between the striatum and disgust recognition.