No abstract

No abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of craniotomy and membranectomy as initial treatment of organized chronic subdural hematoma (OCSH). We retrospectively reviewed a series of 34 consecutive patients suffering from OCSH, diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or contrast computer tomography (CCT) in order to establish the degree of organization and determine the intrahematomal architecture. The indication to perform a primary enlarged craniotomy as initial treatment for non-liquefied chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) with multilayer loculations was based on the hematoma MRI appearance-mostly hyperintense in both T 1 -and T 2 -weighted images with a hypointense web-or net-like structure within the hematoma cavity. The reason why some hematomas evolve towards a complex and organized architecture remains unclear; the most common aspect to come to light was the "long standing" of the CSDHs which, in our series, had an average interval of 10 weeks between head injury and initial scan. Recurrence was found to have occurred in 2 patients (6% of cases) in the form of acute subdural hematoma. One patient died as the result of an intraventricular and subarachnoid haemorrhage, while 2 patients (6%) suffered an haemorrhagic stroke ipsilateral to the OCSH. Eighty-nine percent of cases had a good recovery, while 11% remained unchanged or worsened. In select cases, based on the MRI appearance, primary enlarged craniotomy seems to be the treatment of choice for achieving a complete recovery and a reduced recurrence rate in OCSH.

Solitary pyogenic thalamic and basal ganglia abscesses are relatively uncommon. Even if widespread antibiotic therapy and modern imaging technologies combined with minimally invasive techniques have improved the outcome in patients with brain abscesses, this is counterbalanced by an increasing population of immunocompromised patients. Basal ganglia, thalamic, brainstem or multiple abscesses are usually of hematogenous origin with an underlying source of infection which can include congenital heart disease, thoracic sepsis or, less frequently, an odontogenic or otogenic source. However, no evident foci of sepsis or predisposing factors may be found. Only a few studies are reported in the literature, because midline abscesses are usually included in studies dealing on the treatment of abscesses in general. Different treatment options and the timing of treatment are described. We report our experience in 3 consecutive cases of thalamic abscess, treated by stereotactic puncture as the first step, followed by histological analysis, external drainage and targeted intrathecal and systemic antibiotic therapy. Deep-seated abscesses seem to behave differently as they are associated with an increased risk of intraventricular rupture and antibiotic resistance, a fact which justifies a more aggressive and immediate surgical treatment. We review the literature on this topic in the last 20 years.

No abstract

OBJECTIVEThe goal of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between fenestrated pedicle screws augmented with cement and expandable pedicle screws in percutaneous vertebral fixation surgical procedures for the treatment of degenerative and traumatic spinal diseases in aging patients with osteoporosis.METHODSThis was a prospective, single-center study. Twenty patients each in the expandable and cement-augmented screw groups were recruited. Clinical outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and satisfaction rates. Radiographic outcomes comprised radiological measurements on the vertebral motion segment of the treated levels. Intraoperative data including complications were collected. All patients completed the clinical and radiological outcomes. Outcomes were compared preoperatively and postoperatively.RESULTSAn average shorter operative time was found in procedures in which expandable screws were used versus those in which cement-augmented screws were used (p < 0.001). No differences resulted in perioperative blood loss between the 2 groups. VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved in both groups after surgery. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to baseline VAS or ODI scores. The satisfaction rate of both groups was more than 85%. Radiographic outcomes also showed no significant difference in segment stability between the 2 groups. No major complications after surgery were seen. There were 4 cases (20%) of approach-related complications, all in fenestrated screw procedures in which asymptomatic cement extravasations were observed. In 1 case the authors detected a radiologically evident osteolysis around a cement-augmented screw 36 months after surgery. In another case they identified a minor loosening of an expandable screw causing local back discomfort at the 3-year follow-up.CONCLUSIONSExpandable pedicle screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of fenestrated screws are both safe and effective techniques to increase the pullout strength of screws placed in osteoporotic spine. In this series, clinical and radiological outcomes were equivalent between the 2 groups. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first report comparing the cement augmentation technique versus expandable screws in the treatment of aging patients with osteoporosis.

No abstract

No abstract