Objectives
In the Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT) of the National
Institutes of Health Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, a
conservative fluid protocol (FACTT Conservative) resulted in a lower
cumulative fluid balance and better outcomes than a liberal fluid protocol
(FACTT Liberal). Subsequent Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network
studies used a simplified conservative fluid protocol (FACTT Lite). The
objective of this study was to compare the performance of FACTT Lite, FACTT
Conservative, and FACTT Liberal protocols.
Design
Retrospective comparison of FACTT Lite, FACTT Conservative, and FACTT
Liberal. Primary outcome was cumulative fluid balance over 7 days. Secondary
outcomes were 60-day adjusted mortality and ventilator-free days through day
28. Safety outcomes were prevalence of acute kidney injury and new
shock.
Setting
ICUs of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network participating
hospitals.
Patients
Five hundred three subjects managed with FACTT Conservative, 497
subjects managed with FACTT Liberal, and 1,124 subjects managed with FACTT
Lite.
Interventions
Fluid management by protocol.
Measurements and Main Results
Cumulative fluid balance was 1,918 ± 323 mL in FACTT Lite,
−136 ±491 mL in FACTT Conservative, and 6,992 ± 502
mL in FACTT Liberal (p < 0.001). Mortality was not
different between groups (24% in FACTT Lite, 25% in FACTT
Conservative and Liberal, p = 0.84).
Ventilator-free days in FACTT Lite (14.9 ±0.3) were equivalent to
FACTT Conservative (14.6±0.5) (p = 0.61)
and greater than in FACTT Liberal (12.1 ±0.5, p
< 0.001 vs Lite). Acute kidney injury prevalence was 58% in
FACTT Lite and 57% in FACTT Conservative (p
= 0.72). Prevalence of new shock in FACTT Lite (9%) was
lower than in FACTT Conservative (13%) (p =
0.007 vs Lite) and similar to FACTT Liberal (11%)
(p = 0.18 vs Lite).
Conclusions
FACTT Lite had a greater cumulative fluid balance than FACTT
Conservative but had equivalent clinical and safety outcomes. FACTT Lite is
an alternative to FACTT Conservative for fluid management in Acute
Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically affected medical education. Emergency medicine (EM) requires excellence in multiple core competencies, including leadership, teamwork, and communication skills as well as procedural experience. To meet these How to cite this article: Austin A, Rudolf F, Fernandez J, et al.COVID-19 educational innovation: Hybrid in-person and virtual simulation for emergency medicine trainees. AEM
Objectives
In effort to improve chest compression quality among health care providers, numerous feedback devices have been developed. Few studies, however, have focused on the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback devices for infants and children. This study evaluated the quality of chest compressions with standard team-leader coaching, a metronome (MetroTimer by ONYX Apps), and visual feedback (SkillGuide Cardiopulmonary Feedback Device) during simulated infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Methods
Seventy voluntary health care providers who had recently completed Pediatric Advanced Life Support or Basic Life Support courses were randomized to perform simulated infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation into 1 of 3 groups: team-leader coaching alone (control), coaching plus metronome, or coaching plus SkillGuide for 2 minutes continuously. Rate, depth, and frequency of complete recoil during cardiopulmonary resuscitation were recorded by the Laerdal SimPad device for each participant. American Heart Association–approved compression techniques were randomized to either 2-finger or encircling thumbs.
Results
The metronome was associated with more ideal compression rate than visual feedback or coaching alone (104/min vs 112/min and 113/min; P = 0.003, 0.019). Visual feedback was associated with more ideal depth than auditory (41 mm vs 38.9; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in complete recoil between groups. Secondary outcomes of compression technique revealed a difference of 1 mm. Subgroup analysis of male versus female showed no difference in mean number of compressions (221.76 vs 219.79; P = 0.72), mean compression depth (40.47 vs 39.25; P = 0.09), or rate of complete release (70.27% vs 64.96%; P = 0.54).
Conclusions
In the adult literature, feedback devices often show an increase in quality of chest compressions. Although more studies are needed, this study did not demonstrate a clinically significant improvement in chest compressions with the addition of a metronome or visual feedback device, no clinically significant difference in Pediatric Advanced Life Support–approved compression technique, and no difference between compression quality between genders.
Early-gestation pregnant ED patients requiring pelvic US were discharged earlier when point-of-care US was used rather than radiology US; however, this trial did not achieve our target of 30 minutes. Nevertheless, our data support the routine use of ED point-of-care US for IUP, saving the most time if a conclusive IUP is identified.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.