The German Environmental Specimen Bank (ESB) continuously collects 24-h urine samples since the early 1980s in Germany. In this study we analyzed 300 urine samples from the years 2007 to 2015 for 21 phthalate metabolites (representing exposure to 11 parent phthalates) and combined the data with two previous retrospective measurement campaigns (1988 to 2003 and 2002 to 2008). The combined dataset comprised 1162 24-h urine samples spanning the years 1988 to 2015. With this detailed set of human biomonitoring data we describe the time course of phthalate exposure in Germany over a time frame of 27 years. For the metabolites of the endocrine disrupting phthalates di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP) and butylbenzyl phthalate (BBzP) we observed a roughly ten-fold decline in median metabolite levels from their peak levels in the late 1980s/early 1990s compared to most recent levels from 2015. Probably, bans (first enacted in 1999) and classifications/labelings (enacted in 2001 and 2004) in the European Union lead to this drop. A decline in di-isobutyl phthalate (DiBP) metabolite levels set in only quite recently, possibly due to its later classification as a reproductive toxicant in the EU in 2009. In a considerable number of samples collected before 2002 health based guidance values (BE, HBM I) have been exceeded for DnBP (27.2%) and DEHP (2.3%) but also in recent samples some individual exceedances can still be observed (DEHP 1.0%). A decrease in concentration for all low molecular weight phthalates, labelled or not, was seen in the most recent years of sampling. For the high molecular weight phthalates, DEHP seems to have been substituted in part by di-isononyl phthalate (DiNP), but DiNP metabolite levels have also been declining in the last years. Probably, non-phthalate alternatives increasingly take over for the phthalates in Germany. A comparison with NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) data from the United States covering the years 1999 to 2012 revealed both similarities and differences in phthalate exposure between Germany and the US. Exposure to critical phthalates has decreased in both countries with metabolite levels more and more aligning with each other, but high molecular weight phthalates substituting DEHP (such as DiNP) seem to become more important in the US than in Germany.

No abstract

Di(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHTP) is used as a substitute for di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), an ortho-phthalate-based plasticizer that is classified and labeled due to its toxicity to reproduction. In this study the metabolism and urinary excretion kinetics of DEHTP were investigated by single oral dosage of 50 mg DEHTP to three male volunteers (resulting in individual dosages between 0.55 and 0.59 mg/kg body weight). Separate urine samples were consecutively collected for 48 h. In analogy to DEHP, we quantified specific side-chain-oxidized monoester metabolites of DEHTP (5OH-MEHTP, 5oxo-MEHTP, 5cx-MEPTP and 2cx-MMHTP) by HPLC-MS/MS with online sample clean-up and isotope dilution. All postulated metabolites were detectable in all samples after dosage. The predominant, specific urinary metabolite was 5cx-MEPTP representing about 13.0 % of the applied dose as mean of the three volunteers (range 7.0-20.4 %) in urine, followed by 5OH-MEHTP (mean: 1.8 %; range 1.3-2.4 %) and 5oxo MEHTP (mean: 1.0 %; range 0.6-1.6 %). 2cx-MMHTP was a minor metabolite representing only 0.3 % (range 0.2-0.4 %). In total, about 16.1 % of the dose was recovered in urine as the above investigated specific metabolites within 48 h with the major share (95 %) being excreted within the first 24 h. Investigation of the glucuronidation patterns revealed that the carboxy-metabolites are excreted almost completely in their free form (>90 %), whereas for 5OH-MEHTP and 5oxo-MEHTP, glucuronidation is preferred (>70 %). With this study we provide reliable urinary excretion factors to calculate DEHTP intakes based on metabolite concentrations in environmental and occupational studies.

Hexamoll(®) DINCH(®) (diisononyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate) is a new high-molecular-weight plasticizer and a phthalate substitute. In this study, the metabolism of DINCH(®) was investigated by oral dosage of three male volunteers with approximately 50 mg Hexamoll(®) DINCH(®) (resulting in individual doses between 0.552 and 0.606 mg/kg body weight). Their urine samples were consecutively collected over 48 h. In analogy to di-iso-nonylphthalate (DINP) metabolism, we quantified the simple monoester mono-isononyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (MINCH) and its secondary oxidized metabolites with HPLC-MS/MS via isotope dilution analysis. Additionally, we quantified the unspecific full breakdown product, cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid (CHDA), via standard addition. All postulated metabolites were present in all samples analyzed. The unspecific CHDA was identified as the major urinary metabolite representing 23.7 % of the dose as the mean of the three volunteers (range 20.0-26.5 %). 14.8 % (11.3-16.7 %) of the dose was excreted as monoesters with oxidative modifications, in particular OH-MINCH 10.7 % (7.7-12.9 %), oxo-MINCH 2.0 % (1.5-2.6 %) and carboxy-MINCH 2.0 % (1.8-2.3 %). Less than 1 % was excreted as the simple monoester MINCH. In sum, 39.2 % (35.9-42.4 %) of the DINCH(®) dose was excreted as these metabolites in urine within 48 h. Over 90 % of the metabolites investigated were excreted within 24 h after application. The secondary oxidized metabolites, with elimination half-times between 10 and 18 h, proved to be apt and specific biomarkers to determine DINCH(®) exposure. With this study, we provide reliable urinary excretion factors to calculate DINCH(®) intakes based on these metabolites in environmental and occupational studies.

No abstract