Limited but real potential for self-assistance in chronic tetraplegics by EEG-BCI-actuated mechatronic devices was found, which was mainly related to spectral density in the beta range positively (increasing therewith) and to AIS sensory score negatively.

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular progressive disease, characterized by decreased amounts of survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, due to an autosomal recessive genetic defect. Despite recent research, there is still no cure. Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide acting on the SMN2 gene, is intrathecally administered all life long, while onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi, a gene therapy, is administered intravenously only once. Both therapies have proven efficacy, with best outcomes obtained when administered presymptomatically. In recent years, disease-modifying therapies such as nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi have changed the natural history of SMA. Methods: We observed seven SMA type I patients, who received both therapies. We compared their motor function trajectories, ventilation hours and cough assist sessions to a control group of patients who received one therapy, in order to investigate whether combination therapy may be more effective than a single intervention alone. Results: Patients who received both therapies, compared to the monotherapy cohort, had the same motor function trajectory. Moreover, it was observed that the evolution of motor function was better in the 6 months following the first therapy than in the first 6 months after adding the second treatment. Conclusions: Our results suggest that early treatment is more important than combined therapy.

Study design: Literature review. Objectives: To review the main published current neuroprotection research trends and results in spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting: This paper is the result of a collaboration between a group of European scientists. Methods: Recent studies, especially in genetic, immune, histochemical and bio (nano)-technological fields, have provided new insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms occurring within the central nervous system (NS), including SCIs. As a consequence, a new spectrum of therapies aiming to antagonize the 'secondary injury' pathways (that is, to provide neuroprotection) and also to repair such classically irreparable structures is emerging. We reviewed the most significant published works related to such novel, but not yet entirely validated, clinical practice therapies. Results: There have been identified many molecules, primarily expressed by heterogenous glial and neural subpopulations of cells, which are directly or indirectly critical for tissue damaging/sparing/ re-growth inhibiting, angiogenesis and neural plasticity, and also various substances/energy vectors with regenerative properties, such as MAG (myelin-associated glycoprotein), Omgp (oligodendrocyte myelin glycoprotein), KDI (synthetic: Lysine-Asparagine-Isoleucine 'g-1 of Laminin Kainat Domain'), Nogo (Neurite outgrowth inhibitor), NgR (Nogo protein Receptor), the Rho signaling pathway (superfamily of 'Rho-dopsin geneFincluding neurotransmitterFreceptors'), EphA4 (Ephrine), GFAP (Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein), different subtypes of serotonergic and glutamatergic receptors, antigens, antibodies, immune modulators, adhesion molecules, scavengers, neurotrophic factors, enzymes, hormones, collagen scar inhibitors, remyelinating agents and neurogenetic/plasticity inducers, all aiming to preserve/re-establish the morphology and functional connections across the lesion site. Accordingly, modern research and experimental SCI therapies focus on several intricate, rather overlapping, therapeutic objectives and means, such as neuroprotective, neurotrophic, neurorestorative, neuroreparative, neuroregenerative, neuro(re)constructive and neurogenetic interventions. Conclusion: The first three of these therapeutical directions are generically assimilated as neuroprotective, and are synthetically presented and commented in this paper in an attempt to conceptually systematize them; thus, the aim of this article is, by emphasizing the state-of-the art in the domain, to optimize theoretical support in selecting the most effective pharmacological and physical interventions for preventing, as much as possible, paralysis, and for maximizing recovery chances after SCI.

Introduction. ESWT refers to the use of Shock Waves in medical practice. It was used as an important tool in spasticity management of children with CP. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of a 3 session of ESWT on spastic upper and lower limbs muscles in children with CP. Methods. Sixty-three children (37 boys and 26 girls), mean age 99.57±53.74 months, were included in the study. We used focused ESWT, applied in 3 sessions during the admission of each child, on the mainly affected muscles, using the same parameters on all patients (energy – 0.15 mJ/mm2, shot dose - 500 shocks/ session, frequency - 10 Hz). All patients were assessed two times: once, in admission (before any physical or ESWT appliance) and second, at discharge (after receiving the entire prescribed treatment), following: Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) and also a Questionnaire on Pain caused by spasticity (QPS).Results. We found a better and significant decrease of MAS level in the ESWT treated group, thus leading to a concomitant decrease of QPS score and also increase of GMFM-66 score.Conclusion. ESWT, applied in 3 sessions, with 0.15 mJ/ mm2, using 500 shocks/ min and 10 Hz as frequency may decrease children spasticity level and pain caused by it and improve the gross motor function.