We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to examine the effects of a salt-reduction and efficacy-maintenance program on the improvement and maintenance of self-care and self-efficacy in reducing the salt intake of older people with high blood pressure. A total of 51 participants with hypertension/prehypertension in Indonesia were randomly assigned to a control group or one of two intervention groups: salt-reduction training or salt-reduction and efficacy-maintenance. The salt-reduction and efficacy-maintenance group received educational training and a maintenance meeting; the participants' knowledge, attitudes, self-care practices, and self-efficacy significantly improved after training and were maintained after the maintenance meeting. Participants in the salt-reduction training group showed significant effects for the same variables; however, their food salt concentrations rebounded after the maintenance meeting. No significant improvement was found in the control group. The salt-reduction and efficacy-maintenance group participants reported positive effects of salt reduction and different practices based on who prepared their meals. The salt-reduction and efficacy-maintenance group program was effective in improving and maintaining knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy of salt-reduction practices and could be applied with community-dwelling older people with high blood pressure.

No abstract

GENERAL PURPOSE To provide information on the effectiveness of active and reactive support surfaces in reducing the incidence and prevalence of pressure injuries (PIs) in adult ICU patients. TARGET AUDIENCE This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES After participating in this educational activity, the participant will: 1. Distinguish features of active and reactive support surfaces used in the ICU.2. Compare the PI incidence in patients using a variety of support surfaces.3. Synthesize recommendations for the use of support surfaces to reduce the risk of PI in adult ICU patients. OBJECTIVE To identify and analyze scientific evidence on the effectiveness of active and reactive support surfaces in reducing the incidence and prevalence of pressure injury (PI) in adult ICU patients. DATA SOURCES PubMed, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, ClinicalKey for Nursing, Cochrane Library, and secondary searches. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they related to support surfaces, involved adult ICU patients aged ≥18 years, and the primary outcome measured was incidence or prevalence of PI. The initial search resulted in 8,357 articles; after exclusions, 31 complete texts were assessed for feasibility. A total of eight articles were included in this review. A bias risk assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. DATA EXTRACTION Data were extracted by one reviewer and summarized in a table of study results that was examined and verified by two other reviewers. DATA SYNTHESIS Reactive (constant low pressure) support surfaces included viscoelastic foam mattresses, static air mattresses, and low-air-loss mattresses, whereas the active support surface consisted of alternating-pressure air mattresses. Alternating pressure mattress and viscoelastic foam mattress use both resulted in significantly lower PI incidence. CONCLUSION Support surface use is limited, and no particular type is proven to be superior to others. Clinicians should select support surfaces based on their therapeutic features and how well they meet the patient’s particular needs.