In late 2005, the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority requested an evaluation of all tested telemedicine services in northern Norway to clarify which were suitable for large scale implementation. A total of 282 reports from the Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine, the University Hospital of North Norway and the University of Tromsø were included in the study. Projects not focusing on secondary health care were excluded and 46 studies representing 21 topics entered the final analysis. They were analysed with a self-developed scoring tool focusing on five items. Eleven topics were concluded as being candidates for large scale implementation and grouped according to priority. The first priority topics were teleradiology, digital communication/integration of patient records and education. The second priority topics were teledialysis, pre-hospital thrombolysis, telepsychiatry and teledermatology. The third priority topics were paediatrics, district medical centres, tele-ophthalmology and tele-otorhinolaryngology. No priority was suggested for the projects in cardiology, endocrinology, geriatrics, gynaecology/obstetrics, pathology and nursing/care. User support, training, research ability, financial incentives and interaction between clinicians and ICT-personnel were considered as important factors in motivating health-care personnel to use telemedicine.
We carried out a prospective study of the effect of neurosurgical teleconsultations on patient management in northern Norway. The total number of teleradiology image transfers during an eight-month study period was 723. We recorded data on 99 (14%) of these teleconsultations, which concerned 92 patients; the remainder were transfers to other departments at our hospital and transfers of routine examinations from a small community hospital that did not have a radiologist. The neurosurgeon on call noted the clinical condition and response time for each consultation. The consequences of the teleconsultation and the eventual benefits of the image transfer were evaluated. All 10 referring hospitals in the region used the service. The median response time was 3 hours (range 1-21 hours) in emergency cases and 1 day (range 1-7 days) in ordinary consultations. The response time was significantly shorter for patients with head injuries (median 3 hours) than for those with intracranial tumours (median 24 hours). Image transfer was considered beneficial for the patient in 93% of the cases. Avoidance of unnecessary patient transfer, changes of treatment at the referring hospital on the advice of the neurosurgeon and initiation of emergency transfer occurred in 34%, 42% and 13% of cases, respectively. The results confirm that teleconsultations between referring hospitals and a regional neurosurgical service influence patient management and reduce the frequency of patient transfer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.