Chemiluminescence in 1,2-dioxetane occurs via a thermally-activated decomposition reaction into two formaldehyde molecules. Both ground state and non-adiabatic
Benchmarking molecular properties
with Gaussian-type orbital (GTO)
basis sets can be challenging, because one has to assume that the
computed property is at the complete basis set (CBS) limit, without
a robust measure of the error. Multiwavelet (MW) bases can be systematically
improved with a controllable error, which eliminates the need for
such assumptions. In this work, we have used MWs within Kohn–Sham
density functional theory to compute static polarizabilities for a
set of 92 closed-shell and 32 open-shell species. The results are
compared to recent benchmark calculations employing the GTO-type aug-pc4
basis set. We observe discrepancies between GTO and MW results for
several species, with open-shell systems showing the largest deviations.
Based on linear response calculations, we show that these discrepancies
originate from artifacts caused by the field strength and that several
polarizabilies from a previous study were contaminated by higher order
responses (hyperpolarizabilities). Based on our MW benchmark results,
we can affirm that aug-pc4 is able to provide results close to the
CBS limit, as long as finite difference effects can be controlled.
However, we suggest that a better approach is to use MWs, which are
able to yield precise finite difference polarizabilities even with
small field strengths.
Chemiexcitation of 1,2-dioxetanes is initiated by the cleavage of the O–O bond, then the molecule enters a region where nonadiabatic transitions to excited states are feasible. Does the surface topography explain chemiexcitation yield differences?
MRChem is a code for molecular electronic structure calculations, based on a multiwavelet adaptive basis representation. We provide a description of our implementation strategy and several benchmark calculations. Systems comprising more than a thousand orbitals are investigated at the Hartree−Fock level of theory, with an emphasis on scaling properties. With our design, terms that formally scale quadratically with the system size in effect have a better scaling because of the implicit screening introduced by the inherent adaptivity of the method: all operations are performed to the requested precision, which serves the dual purpose of minimizing the computational cost and controlling the final error precisely. Comparisons with traditional Gaussian-type orbitals-based software show that MRChem can be competitive with respect to performance.
Transition metal-catalyzed reactions invariably include steps, where ligands associate or dissociate. In order to obtain reliable energies for such reactions, sufficiently large basis sets need to be employed. In this paper, we have used high-precision Multiwavelet calculations to compute the metal-ligand association energies for 27 transition metal complexes with common ligands such as H2, CO, olefins and solvent molecules. By comparing our Multiwavelet results to a variety of frequently used Gaussian-type basis sets, we show that counterpoise corrections, which are widely employed to correct for basis set superposition errors, often lead to underbinding. Additionally, counterpoise corrections are difficult to employ, when the association step also involves a chemical transformation. Multiwavelets, which can be conveniently applied to all types of reactions, provide a promising alternative for computing electronic interaction energies free from any basis set errors. File list (3) download file view on ChemRxiv Manuscript_MWonTM_31012021.pdf (1.86 MiB) download file view on ChemRxiv Supporting Information_MWonTM_31012021.pdf (3.26 MiB) download file view on ChemRxiv ALL_GEOMETRIES.xyz (103.21 KiB)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.