Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is particularly appropriate for persons with dementia (PWD) since it fosters conversation about dementia-specific illness scenarios, addresses inconsistencies between advance directives and patients’ observed behaviour, emphasises prospective and relational autonomy, and may be generally consistent to elderly’s decision-making needs. However, despite the evidence of its benefits, ACP is yet to become widely used among PWD. In this paper, we present results regarding the feasibility and acceptability of a pilot intervention designed to foster ACP among PWD and their relative and explore future outcome measures in prevision of a randomized controlled trial. Methods: In order to assess pre-post variations, we used qualitative interviews and four psychometric scales: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Questionnaire of Psychological Autonomy, Decisional conflict scale, and Zarit burden scale. We added two visual analog scales for perceived control over and perceived involvement in healthcare decisions, as well as two hypothetic scenarios to test concordance between PWD’s and surrogate’s decisions.Results: Five main challenges in terms of feasibility were 1) to locate eligible patients, 2) to tailor recruitment procedures to recruitment locations, 3) to adapt inclusion criteria to meet clinical routines, 4) to engage PWD and their relatives in ACP, and 5) to choose outcome criteria that do not burden PWD. Alongside with those expected challenges, we discuss substantial unanticipated gatekeeping by the research ethics committee and healthcare professionals. Despite the setbacks, the intervention was well received by PWD and their relatives that expressed satisfaction with the procedure, especially in regard to the opportunity to discuss a sensitive topic with the help of a facilitator. Relatives’ perceived control over healthcare decisions increased, as well as concordance between PWD’s preferences and relatives’ decision. Conclusion: Misconceptions about dementia and ACP, both in the patient, relatives, and healthcare providers, combined with structural institutional challenges, have the power to impede research and implementation of ACP in dementia care. For this reason, we advocate for a systemic approach of ACP and for the use of ACP tools and research adapted to PWD cognitive capacities.Trial registration: This trial was registered in the database clinicaltrial.gov with the number NCT03615027
"Health decisions occur in a rich context in which social influences are omnipresent. The tendency to compare oneself with others has been described as one of the critical social factors influencing decision making. Based on a collection of 43 audio-recordings of hospital admission encounters which were analyzed though a conversation analytic methodology, we present findings and reflections in regard to how patients and physicians discuss cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. The phenomena of interest concerns how and when patients and physicians refer to what other people decide (for example: “Often the patients tell us: No futile care”). This practice is encountered in 6 of the conversations recorded. Reference to other people’s decisions is a way to talk about options, but it does much more than just enumerating them. As a resource in interaction, this reference is employed when the patient can’t or doesn’t express a preference (thereby clarifying options) or when the preference the patient expressed is problematic (because contrary to expectations). By using this reference, decision making is projected as a matter of membership to a group of individuals, and not as a matter of individual prognostic.The ethical implications of referring to other people’s choices are significant, since it can influence the patient and pose a serious threat to autonomous decisions. We argue that findings such as ours, stemming from data-driven studies of healthcare communication, are pivotal for informing ethics education in its effort to address the biases that physicians impose upon patients during decision making. "
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.