No abstract

BackgroundUterine sarcomas consist a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal gynecological malignancies with unclear therapeutic recommendations and unspecific but poor prognosis, since they usually metastasize and tend to recur very often, even in early stages.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all female patients with uterine sarcomas treated in our institution over the last 17 years. Clinico-pathological data, treatments and outcomes were recorded. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted and time-to-event analyses were estimated using Cox regression.ResultsData were retrieved from 61 women with a median age of 53 (range: 27–78) years, at diagnosis. Fifty-one patients were diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 3 with high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), 5 with undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS), 1 with Ewing sarcoma (ES) and 1 with Rhabdomyosarcoma (RS). 24 cases had stage I, 7 stage II, 14 stage III and 16 stage IV disease. Median disease-free survival (DFS) in adjuvant approach was 18.83 months, and median overall survival (OS) 31.07 months. High mitotic count (> 15 mitoses) was significantly associated with worse OS (P < 0.001) and worse DFS (P = 0.028).ConclusionsMitotic count appears to be independent prognostic factor while further insights are needed to improve adjuvant and palliative treatment of uterine sarcomas.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common types of malignant mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, with an estimated incidence of 1.5/100.000 per year and 1–2% of gastrointestinal neoplasms. About 75–80% of patients have mutations in the KIT gene in exons 9, 11, 13, 14, 17, and 5–10% of patients have mutations in the platelet-derived growth factor receptor a (PDGFRA) gene in exons 12, 14, 18. Moreover, 10–15% of patients have no mutations and are classified as wild type GIST. The treatment for metastatic or unresectable GISTs includes imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib. So far, GIST therapies have raised great expectations and offered patients a better quality of life, but increased pharmacological resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors is often observed. New treatment options have emerged, with ripretinib, avapritinib, and cabozantinib getting approvals for these tumors. Nowadays, immune checkpoint inhibitors form a new landscape in cancer therapeutics and have already shown remarkable responses in various tumors. Studies in melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma are very encouraging as these inhibitors have increased survival rates. The purpose of this review is to present alternative approaches for the treatment of the GIST patients, such as combinations of immunotherapy and novel inhibitors with traditional therapies (tyrosine kinase inhibitors).

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The Hippo pathway is a developmental pathway recently discovered in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>; in mammals it normally controls organ development and wound healing. Hippo signaling is deregulated in breast cancer (BC). MST1/2 and LATS1/2 kinases are the upstream molecular elements of Hippo signaling which phosphorylate and regulate the two effectors of Hippo signaling, YAP1 and TAZ cotranscriptional activators. The two molecular effectors of the Hippo pathway facilitate their activity through TEAD transcription factors. Several molecular pathways with known oncogenic functions cross-talk with the Hippo pathway. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic review studying the correlation of the Hippo pathway with BC tumorigenesis, prognosis, and treatment was performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Recent literature highlights the critical role of Hippo signaling in a wide spectrum of biological mechanisms in BC. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> The Hippo pathway has a crucial position in BC molecular biology, cellular behavior, and response to treatment. Targeting the Hippo pathway could potentially improve the prognosis and outcome of BC patients.

Osteosarcoma is the most frequent primary bone cancer, mainly affecting those of young ages. Although surgery combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy has significantly increased the chances of cure, recurrent and refractory disease still impose a tough therapeutic challenge. We performed a systematic literature review of the available clinical evidence, regarding treatment of recurrent and/or refractory osteosarcoma over the last two decades. Among the 72 eligible studies, there were 56 prospective clinical trials, primarily multicentric, single arm, phase I or II and non-randomized. Evaluated treatment strategies included cytotoxic chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase and mTOR inhibitors and other targeted agents, as well as immunotherapy and combinatorial approaches. Unfortunately, most treatments have failed to induce objective responses, albeit some of them may sustain disease control. No driver mutations have been recognized, to serve as effective treatment targets, and predictive biomarkers of potential treatment effectiveness are lacking. Hopefully, ongoing and future clinical and preclinical research will unlock the underlying biologic mechanisms of recurrent and refractory osteosarcoma, expanding the therapeutic choices available to pre-treated osteosarcoma patients.

Brain metastases are rare events in patients with sarcoma and the available information is relatively limited. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with sarcoma who developed brain metastases between April 2010 and April 2020 in six centers. Thirty-four adult patients were included with a median age at brain metastases diagnosis of 55.5 years (range, 18–75). The primary sarcomas originated either from soft tissue (n = 27) or bone (n = 7) and the most common subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (n = 8), Ewing sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) (n = 7) and osteosarcoma (n = 3). Most primary tumors were of high grade and located mainly in the extremities (n = 18). The vast majority of patients at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis already had extracranial metastatic disease (n = 26). The median time from sarcoma diagnosis to cerebral metastasis diagnosis was 16 months (range, 1–136). Treatment modalities for brain metastatic disease included whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (n = 22), chemotherapy (n = 17), exclusive palliative care (n = 5), surgery (n = 9), targeted therapy (n = 6) or stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 2). Most patients experienced a progression of brain metastases (n = 11). The median overall survival from brain metastasis diagnosis was 3 months (range, 0–80). OS was significantly influenced by time-to-brain metastases (p = 0.041), WBRT (p = 0.018), surgery (p = 0.002) and chemotherapy (p = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis, only the localization of the primary (p = 0.047) and WBRT (p = 0.038) were associated with survival with statistical significance. Patients with sarcoma brain metastases have a particularly poor prognosis and an appropriate therapeutic approach is yet to be defined.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been found to play an important role in breast cancer, functioning either as potential oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, but their role in the prognosis of patients remains unclear. The aim of the present review study is to highlight recent preclinical and clinical studies performed on both circulating and tissue-specific miRNAs and their potential role as prognostic markers in breast cancer. We systematically searched the PubMed database to explore the prognostic value of miRNAs in breast cancer. After performing the literature search and review, 117 eligible studies were identified. We found that 110 aberrantly expressed miRNAs have been associated with prognosis in breast cancer. In conclusion, the collective data presented in this review indicate that miRNAs could serve as novel prognostic tools in breast cancer, while the clinical application of these findings has yet to be verified.

No abstract