Introduction  High-fidelity team-based simulation has been identified as an effective way of teaching and evaluating both technical and nontechnical skills. Several studies have described the benefits of this modality in a variety of acute care settings, but a lack of standardized methodologies has resulted in heterogeneous findings. Few studies have characterized high fidelity simulation across a broad range of acute care settings and integrated the latest evidence on its educational and patient impact. Methods  The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases were searched for empirical studies from the last 10 years, investigating high fidelity team-based simulation in surgical, trauma, and critical care training curricula. Results  Seventeen studies were included. Interventions and evaluations were comprehensively characterized for each study and were discussed in the context of four overarching acute care settings: the emergency department/trauma bay, the operating room, the intensive care unit, and inpatient ad hoc resuscitation teams. Conclusions  The use of high-fidelity team-based simulation has expanded in acute care and is feasible and effective in a wide variety of specialized acute settings, including the emergency department/trauma bay, the operating room, the intensive care unit, and inpatient ad hoc resuscitation teams. Training programs have evolved to emphasize team-based, multidisciplinary education models and are often conducted in situ to maximize authenticity. In situ simulations have also provided the opportunity for system-level improvement and discussions of complex topics such as social hierarchy. There is limited evidence supporting the impact of simulation on patient outcomes, sustainability of simulation efforts, or cost-effectiveness of training programs. These areas warrant further research now that the scope of utilization across acute care settings has been characterized.

No abstract

IMPORTANCEResident operative autonomy has been steadily decreasing. Whether this reduction in autonomy has been associated with changes in patient outcomes is unclear.OBJECTIVE To assess whether surgical procedures performed by residents without an attending surgeon scrubbed are associated with differences in patient outcomes compared with procedures performed by attending surgeons alone or by residents with the assistance of attending surgeons. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study analyzed 30-day outcomes among patients who received operations at US Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and were recorded within the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database from July 1, 2004, to September 30, 2019. Among 1 797 056 operations recorded in the VASQIP during that period, 1 319 020 were eligible for inclusion. Operations performed by a surgical resident without an attending surgeon scrubbed (resident primary) were propensity score matched on a 1:1 ratio (based on year of procedure and patient age, race, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, functional status, emergency status, inpatient status, presence of multiple comorbidities, and Current Procedural Terminology code) to operations performed by an attending surgeon only (surgeon primary) and operations performed by a resident with assistance from an attending surgeon (resident plus surgeon). EXPOSURES Level of resident involvement.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Thirty-day adjusted all-cause mortality.RESULTS Among 1 319 020 surgical procedures included, 138 750 were performed by residents only, 308 724 were performed by surgeons only, and 871 546 were performed by residents and surgeons. For the 1 319 020 total cases, patients' mean (SD) age was 61.6 (12.9) years; 1 223 051 patients (92.7%) were male; and 212 315 (16.1%) were Black or African American, 63 817 (4.9%) were Hispanic, 830 704 (63.0%) were White, and 212 814 (16.1%) were of other or unknown race and ethnicity. Propensity score matching produced 101 130 pairs of resident-primary and surgeon-primary procedures and 137 749 pairs of resident-primary and resident plus surgeon procedures. Patient all-cause mortality and morbidity were no different among those who received surgeon-primary procedures (mortality: odds ratio [OR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.95-1.12]; morbidity: OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.97-1.05]) vs resident plus surgeon procedures (mortality: OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.97-1.11]; all-cause morbidity: OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-1.00]). Resident-primary procedures had longer operative times than surgeon-primary procedures (median, 80 minutes [IQR, 50-123 minutes] vs 70 minutes [IQR, 41-114 minutes], respectively; P < .001) but shorter operative times than resident plus surgeon procedures (median, 71 minutes [IQR, vs 73 minutes [IQR,; P < .001). Hospital length of stay was unchanged among resident-primary vs surgeon-primary procedures (median, 4 days [IQR, 2-10 days] vs 4 days [IQR, 2-9 days]; P = .08) and statistically signifi...

There is emerging literature that coronavirus disease 2019 infections result in an increased incidence of thrombosis secondary to a prothrombotic state. Initial studies reported ischemic strokes primarily occurring in the critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 population. However, there have been reports of ischemic strokes as the presenting symptom in young noncritically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients without significant risk factors. Further characterization of the coronavirus disease 2019 stroke population is needed. We present four cases of coronavirus disease 2019 ischemic strokes occurring in patients aged 37–68 yrs with varying coronavirus disease 2019 infection severities, premorbid risk factors, clinical presentations (eg, focal and nonfocal), and vascular distributions. These cases highlight the heterogeneity of coronavirus disease 2019 ischemic strokes. The duration of the coronavirus disease 2019–related prothrombotic state is unknown, and it is unclear whether patients are at risk for recurrent strokes. With more coronavirus disease 2019 patients recovering and being discharged to rehabilitation, physiatric awareness of this prothrombotic state and increased incidence of ischemic strokes is essential. Because of the variable presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 ischemic strokes, clinicians can consider neuroimaging as part of the evaluation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients with either acute focal or nonfocal neurologic symptoms. Additional studies are needed to clarify prothrombotic state duration, determine prognosis for recovery, and establish the physiatrist’s role in long-term disease management.

Patients with postoperative complications are often subjected to prolonged life-sustaining treatment based on erroneous assumptions about their goals of care. Shared decision making (SDM) is an evidence-based approach that helps ensure patients' wishes and values are honored in their course of treatment. Perioperative palliative care can help create goal-concordant trajectories of care for high risk, seriously ill, or complicated patients, through sophisticated prognostication, higher-level communication, and recommendations based on the best available evidence and patients' stated goals and priorities. Here, we present a surgeon-to-surgeon consultative model that surmounts many barriers to perioperative palliative care consultation and, as illustrated in the cases presented herein, offers profound and unique benefits for patients, families, and surgeons alike. While the support of a surgical colleague with palliative care skills can be helpful postoperatively in the setting of unanticipated outcomes or prolonged recovery, it is particularly beneficial when accessed preoperatively for the purposes of goal-concordant decision making and advance care planning. We encourage both individuals and professional societies to develop and expand the niche for surgeons interested in assisting with goal setting and SDM for patients on a consultative basis, particularly in the preoperative period.

Discussion | To our knowledge, this is the largest study investigating the association of MD with IBTR and contralateral breast cancer in patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery. The data show an association between high MD and the risk of contralateral breast cancer, especially in young patients with breast cancer. In contrast, the risk of IBTR was not affected by the degree of MD. These findings suggest that the degree of MD is not a relevant factor to consider when deciding the types of local treatment in patients with early breast cancer. Rather, the degree of MD can be used for the personalized surveillance approach because high MD is associated with an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer. The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature and the lack of patients of different races and ethnicities.

No abstract

Background: Elderly patients presenting with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) often have comorbidities that increase risk of thromboembolic (TE) disease and recurrent TBI. A significant number are on anticoagulant therapy at the time of injury and studies suggest that continuing anticoagulation can prevent TE events. Understanding bleeding, recurrent TBI, and TE risk after TBI can help to guide therapy. Our objectives were to 1) evaluate the incidence of bleeding, recurrent TBI, and TE events after an initial TBI in older adults and 2) identify which factors contribute to this risk. Methods: Retrospective analysis of Medicare claims between May 30, 2006 and December 31, 2009 for patients hospitalized with TBI was performed. We defined TBI for the index admission, and hemorrhage (gastrointestinal bleeding or hemorrhagic stroke), recurrent TBI, and TE events (stroke, myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism) over the following year using ICD-9 codes. Unadjusted incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Risk factors of these events were identified using logistic regression. Results: Among beneficiaries hospitalized with TBI, incidence of TE events (58.6 events/1000 person-years; 95% CI 56.2, 60.8) was significantly higher than bleeding (23.6 events/1000 person-years; 95% CI 22.2, 25.1) and recurrent TBI events (26.0 events/1000 person-years; 95% CI 24.5, 27.6). Several common factors predisposed to bleeding, recurrent TBI, and TE outcomes. Conclusions: Among Medicare patients hospitalized with TBI, the incidence of TE was significantly higher than that of bleeding or recurrent TBI. Specific risk factors of bleeding and TE events were identified which may guide care of older adults after TBI.