Rationale: The metabolic acidoses are generally separated into 2 categories on the basis of an anion gap calculation: high-anion-gap and normal anion-gap metabolic acidosis. When a high-anion-gap metabolic acidosis (HAGMA) is not clearly explained by common etiologies and routine confirmatory testing, specialized testing can definitively establish rare diagnoses such as 5-oxoproline, d-lactate accumulation, or diethylene glycol toxicity. Presenting Concerns of the Patient: A 56-year-old woman had a prolonged hospital admission following perforated diverticulitis requiring sigmoid resection. Her hospitalization was complicated by feculent peritonitis and surgical wound dehiscence needing prolonged broad-spectrum antibiotics and wound debridements. She developed acute kidney injury and HAGMA in the hospital. Diagnoses: Chart review showed that she received a large cumulative dose of acetaminophen during her hospital stay. Laboratory studies showed markedly increased serum 5-oxoproline causing HAGMA. Interventions (Including Prevention and Lifestyle): Patient was admitted to the intensive care unit and treated with N-acetylcysteine and renal replacement therapy. Outcomes: After admission to the intensive care unit, the patient continued to require vasopressor and ventilatory support for septic shock and a ventilator-associated pneumonia. After an initial recovery and resolution of her HAGMA, she subsequently suffered recurrent aspirations which were fatal. Teaching points: 1. The acronym GOLD MARK is useful when assessing patients with HAGMA and most causes of HAGMA can be established with routine testing. 2. When the etiology of HAGMA remains unclear, additional testing can be required to diagnose rare causes of HAGMA. 3. Rare causes of HAGMA are diethylene glycol, 5-oxoproline, and d-lactate accumulation. 4. Acidosis secondary to 5-oxoproline accumulation can occur even with “therapeutic” doses of acetaminophen in patients receiving it regularly for a prolonged period and who have depleted glutathione stores. 5. Risk factors for glutathione depletion include malnutrition, older age, sepsis, pregnancy, multiple chronic illnesses, and chronic kidney disease.
Background: Treatment of acute borderline cellular rejection (BCR) after kidney transplant has shown mixed results with no consensus on the necessity and modality of interventions. Methods:The emphasis of our study was to assess the histopathologic response when BCR of kidney transplant is being treated with rapid steroid regimen. We analyzed all diagnosed acute BCR between 2018 and 2020. Patients were divided to a treatment responder group (RG) and non-responder group (NRG). All diagnosed BCR were treated with rapid steroid regimen and followed by a biopsy to assess response. Demographic data, recipients' comorbidities and clinical data, donor type, and induction immunosuppression regimen data were collected.Results: Ninety-one patients had acute BCR and were treated with rapid steroid followed by a repeat biopsy. Sixty-three (69%) patients showed persistence BCR and were considered NRG. Age, gender, and race were similar between the two groups. Class I and II calculated panel reactive antibodies were similar between the groups. No significant difference in the median serum creatinine (SCr) was noted between the groups. RG and NRG had a median SCr of 1.6 mg/dL (1.2 -2.1) and 1.5 mg/dL (1.4 -2.0), respectively (P < 0.79). The median SCr at the time of the follow-up biopsy was not different between the groups: SCr of 1.6 mg/dL (1.2 -2.0) vs. 1.4 mg/dL (1.2 -2.2) for the RG and NRG, respectively (P < 0.93). Conclusion:When rapid steroid regimen was used to treat acute BCR after kidney transplant, only smaller number of patients showed response based on the histology evaluation of the follow-up post-treatment biopsies.
Background: There are concerns regarding the gastrointestinal (GI) safety of sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), a medication commonly used in the management of hyperkalemia. Objective: To compare the risk of GI adverse events among users versus non-users of SPS in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Design: International prospective cohort study. Setting: Seventeen countries (Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study [DOPPS] phase 2-6 from 2002 to 2018). Patients: 50 147 adults on maintenance hemodialysis. Measurements: An adverse GI event defined by a GI hospitalization or GI fatality with SPS prescription compared with no SPS prescription. Methods: Overlap propensity score–weighted Cox models. Results: Sodium polystyrene sulfonate prescription was present in 13.4% of patients and ranged from 0.42% (Turkey) to 20.6% (Sweden) with 12.5% use in Canada. A total of 935 (1.9%) adverse GI events (140 [2.1%] with SPS, 795 [1.9%] with no SPS; absolute risk difference 0.2%) occurred. The weighted hazard ratio (HR) of a GI event was not elevated with SPS use compared with non-use (HR = 0.93, 95% confidence interval = 0.83-1.6). The results were consistent when examining fatal GI events and/or GI hospitalization separately. Limitations: Sodium polystyrene sulfonate dose and duration were unknown. Conclusions: Sodium polystyrene sulfonate use in patients on hemodialysis was not associated with a higher risk of an adverse GI event. Our findings suggest that SPS use is safe in an international cohort of maintenance hemodialysis patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.