Background and Aim: Pre-slaughter management and slaughter operations are considered critical factors for animal welfare and meat quality. Previous studies have found poor animal welfare management at municipal slaughterhouses in Ecuador, and little is known about how this affects the microbiological quality of the meat. Therefore, the aim of the study was to analyze the association of the microbiological quality of beef carcasses and animal welfare indicators in a municipal slaughterhouse in Ecuador. Materials and Methods: Data for 6 months were collected from a municipal slaughterhouse in Ecuador. Five trained researchers were strategically located along the slaughter process. A total of 351 animals were observed with regard to welfare indicators, and their carcasses were sampled to evaluate microbiological quality. Antemortem (slipping, falling, and vocalization) and postmortem animal welfare indicators (bleed interval, pH, temperature, and bruises) were measured. To determine the total aerobic bacteria (TAB) and Escherichia coli counts and the presence of Salmonella spp., we collected samples by swabbing four different points of each carcass. The association between microbiological quality and animal welfare indicators was studied using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Results: The mean TAB count was 5.3 log CFU/cm2, and the mean total count of E. coli was 2.4 log CFU/cm2. Salmonella spp. were isolated in 3.1% of the carcasses. An electric goad was used in all animals, 19.1% slipped at least once, and 19.9% vocalized. The mean pH of the carcasses was 7.2, and 79.2% of carcasses had bruises. Multivariate analysis showed that Salmonella spp. and the TAB count were associated with pH and the number of bruises (p = 0.01 in both cases). Conclusion: Although there was non-significant association between the majority of animal welfare indicators and microbiological quality, the poor management affecting animal welfare and carcass hygiene are worrisome.
Background Leptospirosis causes significant economic losses and is an occupational risk in the swine industry, especially in developing tropical regions where social and geoclimatic conditions are favorable for the transmission of this disease. Although vaccination can reduce infection risk, efficacy is diminished if local genetic and antigenic variants of the pathogen are not accounted for in the vaccine. Identifying and characterizing strains hosts, and potential mechanisms of transmission is therefore critical for public health mitigation practices. Methodology/Principal findings Our study was conducted on a rural breeding farm in Ecuador, where we used a PCR assay that targets lipL32 to detect Leptospira spp. and targeted gene sequencing to identify Leptospira santarosai in the kidneys, testicles, and ejaculate of a vaccinated boar. MAT results showed low titers against serovars found in the vaccine, but the MAT panel did not include serovars of L. santarosai. The boar showed no symptoms of leptospirosis but did show blood in the semen. However, no postmortem histopathological lesions were observed tissue samples. Vaccinated sows that were artificially inseminated with the semen from this boar had reproductive problems, suggesting that transmission had occurred. This is the first documented case of Leptospira santarosai in the reproductive tract of a boar. Conclusions/Significance As L. santarosai is pathogenic in other livestock species and humans, our finding highlights the need to evaluate the prevalence and epidemiological significance of this pathogen in livestock and consider the possibility of venereal transmission. In addition, further studies are needed to identify and characterize local serovars that may impact diagnosis and vaccination programs to better control leptospirosis in livestock and spillover into the human population.
BackgroundLeptospirosis causes significant economic losses and is an occupational risk in the swine industry, especially in developing tropical regions where social and geoclimatic conditions are favorable for the transmission of this disease. Although vaccination can reduce infection risk, efficacy is diminished if local genetic and antigenic variants of the pathogen are not accounted for in the vaccine. Identifying and characterizing strains that circulate in different populations is therefore critical for public health mitigation practices.Methodology/Principal findingsOur study was conducted on a rural breeding farm in Ecuador, where we identified, for the first time, Leptospira santarosai in the kidneys, testicles, and ejaculate of a vaccinated boar. L. santarosai was detected with a PCR assay that targets lipL32, and identified by target MLST gene sequencing using an Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer.Conclusions/SignificanceAs L. santarosai is pathogenic in other livestock species and humans, our finding highlights the need to evaluate the prevalence and epidemiological significance of this pathogen in pigs. In addition, further studies are needed to identify and characterize local serovars that may impact diagnosis and vaccination programs to better control leptospirosis in pigs and spillover into the human population.Author summaryLeptospirosis poses a significant threat to human and animal health. In tropical countries, leptospirosis is very common, and responsible of economic losses in the livestock industry. In peridomestic and rural farms, the spillover of leptospira to humans is particularly likely as humans live and work in close proximity to animals. Although animal vaccination can reduce risk of infection, efficacy is diminished when local variants are not included in the vaccine. This report describes, for the first time, the presence of Leptospira santarosai in the reproductive tract of a vaccinated domestic boar from a rural farm in Ecuador. We detected the pathogen in its semen and urine, and despite no tissue damage, was observed in the kidneys, testes or epididymis. The farm veterinarian reported reproductive problems in sows inseminated with the semen from this boar. Our results highlight the importance of recognizing locally circulating serovars and species so that they can be included in vaccines to prevent infection and disease. Effective control of leptospirosis in livestock not only reduces economic losses for breeders, but also reduces the risk of infection and disease in humans.
Introducción. Durante mucho tiempo, los antibióticos fueron la herramienta principal para mejorar el crecimiento de los cerdos, pero actualmente están en estudio varios suplementos que pueden reemplazarlos para evitar el impacto en salud pública derivado de su uso. Objetivo. El objetivo de la presente revisión es sintetizar una lista descriptiva de los principales suplementos alimenticios empleados en la dieta porcina que permite reducir el uso de antibióticos en las explotaciones comerciales. Metodología. La búsqueda y revisión de documentos se fundamentó en una macro recolección de la literatura científica disponible; para la redacción se esquematizaron los conceptos clave y se excluyeron datos poco relevantes o imprecisos. Resultados. Entre estas alternativas se destacan los fitobióticos, que son compuestos químicos derivados de plantas como el tomillo, el orégano y el ajo. Otro grupo son los probióticos, microorganismos vivos que son administrados en dosis adecuadas para otorgar un beneficio al hospedador mediante la regulación del microbiota y la inmunidad intestinal; principalmente abarcan bacterias y levaduras que hacen sinergia con otro tipo de suplementos, los prebióticos, que son sustratos que proveen energía para los probióticos. Se destacan también algunos ácidos orgánicos y compuestos minerales. Conclusiones. Por diversos mecanismos de acción, todos estos suplementos podrían tener un efecto similar a los antibióticos, al disminuir la colonización de patógenos que merman el desarrollo y aumentar el aprovechamiento del alimento, mejorando aspectos como la reproducción y la salud general. La implementación de los suplementos descritos es relevante, considerando el rol de la producción animal en la generación de resistencias a antibióticos, enmarcado en el concepto de One Health.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.