No abstract

BackgroundCombination of the inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC; GSK573719) with the long-acting β2-agonist vilanterol (VI) is an approved maintenance treatment for COPD in the US and EU. We compared the efficacy and safety of UMEC/VI with placebo in patients with COPD of Asian ancestry.Patients and methodsIn this 24-week, Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) on day 169; secondary end points were Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24 and weighted mean (WM) FEV1 over 0–6 hours postdose on day 1. Additional end points and safety were also assessed.ResultsBoth UMEC/VI 125/25 μg and UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg statistically significantly improved trough FEV1 at day 169 versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, 0.216 L, [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.175–0.257]; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, 0.151 L, 95% CI 0.110–0.191; both P<0.001). Statistically significant improvements in TDI score were observed for both UMEC/VI groups versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, 0.9, 95% CI 0.3–1.4, P=0.002; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, 0.7, 95% CI 0.1–1.2, P=0.016). On day 1, both UMEC/VI groups improved 0–6-hour WM FEV1 versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, 0.182 L 95% CI 0.161–0.203; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, 0.160 L, 95% CI 0.139–0.181; both P<0.001). Statistically significant improvements for UMEC/VI groups versus placebo were observed for rescue albuterol use at weeks 1–24 (puffs/day, both P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar across groups.ConclusionIn Asian patients with COPD, once-daily UMEC/VI 125/25 μg and UMEC 62.5/25 μg resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in lung-function end points versus placebo. Symptomatic and quality of life measures also improved. The safety profile of UMEC/VI was consistent with previous studies.

Aims To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of intranasal SB‐705498, a selective TRPV1 antagonist. Methods Two randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, clinical studies were performed: (i) an intranasal SB‐705498 first time in human study to examine the safety and PK of five single escalating doses from 0.5 to 12 mg and of repeat dosing with 6 mg and 12 mg twice daily for 14 days and (ii) a PD efficacy study in subjects with non‐allergic rhinitis (NAR) to evaluate the effect of 12 mg intranasal SB‐705498 against nasal capsaicin challenge. Results Single and repeat dosing with intranasal SB‐705498 was safe and well tolerated. The overall frequency of adverse events was similar for SB‐705498 and placebo and no dose‐dependent increase was observed. Administration of SB‐705498 resulted in less than dose proportional AUC(0,12 h) and Cmax, while repeat dosing from day 1 to day 14 led to its accumulation. SB‐705498 receptor occupancy in nasal tissue was estimated to be high (>80%). Administration of 12 mg SB‐705498 to patients with NAR induced a marked reduction in total symptom scores triggered by nasal capsaicin challenge. Inhibition of rhinorrhoea, nasal congestion and burning sensation was associated with 2‐ to 4‐fold shift in capsaicin potency. Conclusions Intranasal SB‐705498 has an appropriate safety and PK profile for development in humans and achieves clinically relevant attenuation of capsaicin‐provoked rhinitis symptoms in patients with NAR. The potential impact intranasal SB‐705498 may have in rhinitis treatment deserves further evaluation.

IntroductionThe fixed-dose, long-acting bronchodilator combination of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) has not previously been compared with a combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β2-agonist in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).MethodsThis 12-week, randomized, blinded, triple-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study compared once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg with once-daily tiotropium (TIO) 18 mcg + indacaterol (IND) 150 mcg in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD. The primary endpoint was the trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) on day 85 (predefined non-inferiority margin −50 mL), and the secondary endpoint was the 0- to 6-h weighted mean (WM) FEV1 on day 84. Other efficacy endpoints [including rescue medication use, the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score, and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score] and safety endpoints [adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and COPD exacerbations] were also assessed.ResultsTrough FEV1 improvements were comparable between treatment groups [least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline to day 85: UMEC/VI 172 mL; TIO + IND 171 mL; treatment difference 1 mL; 95 % confidence interval (CI) −29 to 30 mL], demonstrating non-inferiority between UMEC/VI and TIO + IND. The treatments produced similar improvements in the trough FEV1 at other study visits and the 0- to 6-h WM FEV1 (LS mean changes at day 84: UMEC/VI 235 mL; TIO + IND 258 mL; treatment difference −23 mL; 95 % CI −54 to 8 mL). The results for patient-reported measures (rescue medication use, TDI focal score, and SGRQ score) were comparable; both treatments produced clinically meaningful improvements in TDI and SGRQ scores. The incidence of AEs and COPD exacerbations, and changes in vital signs were similar for the two treatments.ConclusionUMEC/VI and TIO + IND, given once daily, provided similar improvements in lung function and patient-reported outcomes over 12 weeks in patients with COPD, with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.Trial numbersClinicalTrials.gov study ID NCT02257385; GSK study no. 116961.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40268-016-0131-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

NCT01376245.

SB-705498 12 mg for 14 days did not alleviate the CDA-induced symptoms of NAR. Despite engagement of the TRPV1 receptor, there was no translation to clinical efficacy, suggesting redundancy in symptom pathways.

Poster sessions A128Thorax 2012;67(Suppl 2):A1-A204 Background Topical intranasal steroids are widely considered to be the most efficacious pharmacotherapy for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, and yet, for many, symptoms still remain troublesome. We hypothesise that the residual symptoms are a result of nasal neuronal hyperresponsiveness during the pollen season and should be ameliorated by a topical intranasal TRPV1 antagonist. SB705498 is a selective TRPV1 antagonist shown to produce significant inhibition in animal and human models involving nasal sensory nerves. Methods The study involved 70, male and female, subjects with proven rhinitis in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way incomplete block crossover design in a well validated Allergen Challenge Chamber paradigm in Vienna. Subjects received Placebo, FP (200ug), SB705498 (12mg), or FP+498. Subjects were dosed for 8 days, within the pollen season, before being exposed to a chamber challenge on the 8 th day. TNSS was the primary endpoint recorded for the 4 hours in the chamber. The comparisons of interest were FP+498 vs. FP, and 498 vs. Placebo. Additional endpoints consisted of symptoms over the 8 days of dosing, Active Anterior Rhinomanometry, Rhinoconjunctivitis QLQ, PK and tolerability. Each period was separated by 14-20 days. Results There was no evidence of a decrease in symptoms with FP+498 compared to FP alone, or for 498 compared to placebo. Statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions in TNSS compared with Placebo were observed at all time points during the challenge for FP and FP+498. The mean (95% CI) reduction in weighted mean TNSS was -2.94 (-3.38, -2.50) for FP alone and-2.28 (-2.79, -1.78) for the combination.

No abstract