Specific transcription in late G1, mediated by the transcription factors SBF (Swi4p-Swi6p) and MBF (Mbplp-Swi6p), is crucial for cell cycle progression in budding yeast. In order to better understand the G1/S transition, we initiated a search for conditional mutations synthetic lethal with swi4A. One of the isolated mutants, rsf8swi4A, showed a growth defect due to cell lysis. rsf8 is allelic to PKCJ, encoding a protein kinase C homologue which controls cell integrity. In the presence of the rsf8/(pkcl-8) mutation, a functional SBF but not MBF is required for viability. Importantly, swi4A and swi6A strains are hypersensitive to calcofluor white and SDS, indicating that they possess a weakened cell wall. Overexpression or ectopic expression of CLN did not suppress the pkc1-8swi4A mutant phenotype, thus SBF must control cell integrity independently, rather than acting through CLN expression. We found that at least six genes involved in cell wall biosynthesis are periodically expressed at the G1/S phase boundary. In all six cases, cell cycleregulated expression is due mainly to Swi4p. Finally, we found that the PKCI MAP kinase pathway is a positive regulator of five of these cell wall genes, these genes being novel targets of regulation by this pathway. We suggest that SBF and the PKCJ MAP kinase pathway act in concert to maintain cell integrity during bud formation.

At the restriction point (R), mammalian cells irreversibly commit to divide. R has been viewed as a point in G1 that is passed when growth factor signaling initiates a positive feedback loop of Cdk activity. However, recent studies have cast doubt on this model by claiming R occurs prior to positive feedback activation in G1 or even before completion of the previous cell cycle. Here we reconcile these results and show that whereas many commonly used cell lines do not exhibit a G1 R, primary fibroblasts have a G1 R that is defined by a precise Cdk activity threshold and the activation of cell-cycle-dependent transcription. A simple threshold model, based solely on Cdk activity, predicted with more than 95% accuracy whether individual cells had passed R. That a single measurement accurately predicted cell fate shows that the state of complex regulatory networks can be assessed using a few critical protein activities.

In budding yeast, commitment to cell division corresponds to activating the positive feedback loop of G1 cyclins controlled by the transcription factors SBF and MBF. This pair of transcription factors has over 200 targets, implying that cell cycle commitment coincides with genome-wide changes in transcription. Here, we find that genes within this regulon have a well-defined distribution of transcriptional activation times. Combinatorial use of SBF and MBF results in a logical OR function for gene expression and partially explains activation timing. Activation of G1 cyclin expression precedes the activation of the bulk of the G1/S regulon ensuring that commitment to cell division occurs before large-scale changes in transcription. Furthermore, we find similar positive feedback-first regulation in the yeasts S. bayanus and S. cerevisiae, as well as human cells. The widespread use of the feedback-first motif in eukaryotic cell cycle control, implemented by non-orthologous proteins, suggests its frequent deployment at cellular transitions.

Commitment to division requires that cells sense, interpret, and respond appropriately to multiple signals. In most eukaryotes, cells commit to division in G1 prior to DNA replication. Beyond a point, known as Start in yeast and the restriction point in mammals, cells will proceed through the cell cycle despite changes in upstream signals. In metazoans, misregulated G1 control can lead to developmental problems or disease, so it is important to understand how cells decipher the myriad external and internal signals that contribute to the fundamental all-or-none decision to divide. Extensive study of G1 control in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae and mammalian culture systems has revealed highly similar networks regulating commitment. However, protein sequences of functional orthologs often indicate a total lack of conservation suggesting significant evolution of G1 control. Here, we review recent studies defining the conserved and diverged features of G1 control and highlight systems-level features that may be common to other biological regulatory networks.

Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM) remains an important neurologic disease of horses. There are no pathognomonic clinical signs for the disease. Affected horses can have focal or multifocal central nervous system (CNS) disease. EPM can be difficult to diagnose antemortem. It is caused by either of 2 parasites, Sarcocystis neurona and Neospora hughesi, with much less known about N. hughesi. Although risk factors such as transport stress and breed and age correlations have been identified, biologic factors such as genetic predispositions of individual animals, and parasite‐specific factors such as strain differences in virulence, remain largely undetermined. This consensus statement update presents current published knowledge of the parasite biology, host immune response, disease pathogenesis, epidemiology, and risk factors. Importantly, the statement provides recommendations for EPM diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.