This is a PDF file of a peer-reviewed paper that has been accepted for publication. Although unedited, the content has been subjected to preliminary formatting. Nature is providing this early version of the typeset paper as a service to our authors and readers. The text and figures will undergo copyediting and a proof review before the paper is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

The Ebola virus (EBOV) VP35 protein blocks the virus-induced phosphorylation and activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3), a transcription factor critical for the induction of alpha/beta interferon (IFN-␣/␤) expression. However, the mechanism(s) by which this blockage occurs remains incompletely defined. We now provide evidence that VP35 possesses double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-binding activity. Specifically, VP35 bound to poly(rI) · poly(rC)-coated Sepharose beads but not control beads. In contrast, two VP35 point mutants, R312A and K309A, were found to be greatly impaired in their dsRNA-binding activity. Competition assays showed that VP35 interacted specifically with poly(rI) · poly(rC), poly(rA) · poly(rU), or in vitrotranscribed dsRNAs derived from EBOV sequences, and not with single-stranded RNAs (ssRNAs) or doublestranded DNA. We then screened wild-type and mutant VP35s for their ability to target different components of the signaling pathways that activate IRF-3. These experiments indicate that VP35 blocks activation of IRF-3 induced by overexpression of RIG-I, a cellular helicase recently implicated in the activation of IRF-3 by either virus or dsRNA. Interestingly, the VP35 mutants impaired for dsRNA binding have a decreased but measurable IFN antagonist activity in these assays. Additionally, wild-type and dsRNA-binding-mutant VP35s were found to have equivalent abilities to inhibit activation of the IFN-␤ promoter induced by overexpression of IPS-1, a recently identified signaling molecule downstream of RIG-I, or by overexpression of the IRF-3 kinases IKK and TBK-1. These data support the hypothesis that dsRNA binding may contribute to VP35 IFN antagonist function. However, additional mechanisms of inhibition, at a point proximal to the IRF-3 kinases, most likely also exist.

Ebola virus (EBOV) infection blocks cellular production of alpha/beta interferon (IFN-␣Further, VP24 is found to specifically interact with karyopherin ␣1, the nuclear localization signal receptor for PY-STAT1, but not with karyopherin ␣2, ␣3, or ␣4. Overexpression of VP24 results in a loss of karyopherin ␣1-PY-STAT1 interaction, indicating that the VP24-karyopherin ␣1 interaction contributes to the block to IFN signaling. These data suggest that VP24 is likely to be an important virulence determinant that allows EBOV to evade the antiviral effects of IFNs.The filoviruses, Ebola virus (EBOV) and Marburg virus, cause periodic outbreaks of severe hemorrhagic fever in humans. In EBOV outbreaks consisting of more than 10 reported cases, mortality rates have ranged from 40 to 90% (41), and Marburg virus outbreaks have had reported case fatality rates ranging from 25 to 80% (13). This extreme virulence has made Ebola and Marburg viruses of concern both as naturally emerging pathogens and as potential bioweapons (41).The molecular mechanisms contributing to the severe pathogenesis of filovirus infection are poorly understood. Several potential mechanisms contributing to EBOV virulence have been reviewed (41). These include cytotoxicity of the viral glycoprotein, the production of proinflammatory cytokines, and the dysregulation of the coagulation cascade due to the production of tissue factor (14,20,21,62,64). Infection also appears to induce a general immune suppression (11, 53). Possible mechanisms contributing to this suppression include inhibition of dendritic cell activation and an induction of lymphocyte apoptosis (2,8,18,22,43). Each of these pathogenic processes likely occurs as a result of the active replication of the virus. Thus, the ability of the virus to counteract early antiviral responses, including those of the host's interferon system, likely plays an important role in EBOV virulence (41).EBOV encodes mechanisms to counteract the host interferon (IFN) response by blocking both production of IFN-␣/␤ and cellular responses to IFN-␣/␤ or -␥ treatment (6,24,26,27). We previously demonstrated that the EBOV VP35 protein suppresses IFN-␣/␤ production by inhibiting the activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) (5, 7, 51), and subsequent studies confirm that VP35 exerts this function (8, 28). However, the manner in which EBOV blocks signaling from the IFN-␣/␤ or -␥ receptor has remained incompletely defined.IFN-␣/␤, a family of structurally related proteins, and IFN-␥ bind to two distinct receptors but activate similar signaling pathways (reviewed in reference 38). For both pathways, ligand binding activates receptor-associated Jak family tyrosine kinases. These undergo auto-and transphosphorylation and phosphorylate the cytoplasmic domains of the receptor subunits. The receptor-associated phosphotyrosine residues then serve as docking sites for the SH2 domains of STAT proteins. The receptor-associated STATs then undergo tyrosine-phosphorylation and form homo-or heterodimers via reciprocal SH2 domai...

In March 2005, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) investigated a large hemorrhagic fever (HF) outbreak in Uige Province in northern Angola, West Africa. In total, 15 initial specimens were sent to CDC, Atlanta, Ga., for testing for viruses associated with viral HFs known to be present in West Africa, including ebolavirus. Marburgvirus was also included despite the fact that the origins of all earlier outbreaks were linked directly to East Africa. Surprisingly Remarkably few nucleotide differences were found among the Angolan clinical specimens (0 to 0.07%), consistent with an outbreak scenario in which a single (or rare) introduction of virus from the reservoir species into the human population was followed by person-to-person transmission with little accumulation of mutations. This is in contrast to the 1998 to 2000 marburgvirus outbreak, where evidence of several virus genetic lineages (with up to 21% divergence) and multiple virus introductions into the human population was found.

S evere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) 2, is a readily transmissible zoonotic pathogen and the etiologic agent of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic (1). To determine aerosol stability of the virus, we measured the dynamic (short-term) aerosol efficiencies of SARS-CoV-2 and compared its efficiency with those of SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). The Study We analyzed these 3 viruses' dynamic aerosol efficiencies using 3 nebulizers, the Collison 3-jet (C3), Collison 6-jet (C6) (http://www.chtechusa.com), and Aerogen Solo (AS) (https://www.aerogen.com), to generate viral aerosols (Appendix, https://wwwnc. cdc.gov/EID/article/26/9/20-1806-App1.pdf). We performed comparative efficiency experiments once in each of 4 aerobiology laboratories (Tulane Uni

No abstract

The ebolavirus VP35 protein antagonizes the cellular type I interferon response by blocking phosphorylation of IRF-3, a transcription factor that turns on the expression of a large number of antiviral genes. To identify the domain of VP35 responsible for interferon antagonism, we generated mutations within the VP35 gene and found that a C-terminal basic amino acid motif is required for inhibition of ISG56 reporter gene expression as well as IFN-beta production. Remarkably, this basic amino acid motif displayed high sequence identity with part of the N-terminal RNA-binding domain of another interferon-antagonist, the NS1 protein of influenza A virus.

The emergent coronavirus, designated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a zoonotic pathogen that has demonstrated remarkable transmissibility in the human population and is the etiological agent of a current global pandemic called COVID-19. We measured the dynamic (short-term) aerosol efficiencies of SARS-CoV-2 and compared the efficiencies with two other emerging coronaviruses, SARS-CoV (emerged in 2002) and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV; emerged starting in 2012). We also quantified the long-term persistence of SARS-CoV-2 and its ability to maintain infectivity when suspended in aerosols for up to 16 hours.