Medical Research Council and UK National Institute of Health Research.
Sarcopenia affects 15% of patients with stable COPD and impairs function and health status. Sarcopenia does not impact on response to PR, which can lead to a reversal of the syndrome in select patients.
BackgroundMoving from sitting to standing is a common activity of daily living. The five-repetition sit-tostand test (5STS) is a test of lower limb function that measures the fastest time taken to stand five times from a chair with arms folded. The 5STS has been validated in healthy community-dwelling adults, but data in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) populations are lacking. Aims To determine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the 5STS in patients with COPD. Methods Test-retest and interobserver reliability of the 5STS was measured in 50 patients with COPD. To address construct validity we collected data on the 5STS, exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk (ISW)), lower limb strength (quadriceps maximum voluntary contraction (QMVC)), health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)) and composite mortality indices (Age Dyspnoea Obstruction index (ADO), BODE index (iBODE)). Responsiveness was determined by measuring 5STS before and after outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in 239 patients. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was estimated using anchor-based methods. Results Test-retest and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. 5STS time correlated significantly with ISW, QMVC, SGRQ, 0.35, 0.42 and 0.46, respectively; all p<0.001). Median (25th, 75th centiles) 5STS time decreased with PR (Pre: 14.1 (11.5, 21.3) vs Post: 12.4 (10.2,16.3) s; p<0.001). Using different anchors, a conservative estimate for the MCID was 1.7 s. Conclusions The 5STS is reliable, valid and responsive in patients with COPD with an estimated MCID of 1.7 s. It is a practical functional outcome measure suitable for use in most healthcare settings.
2؉ mobilization, but it was blocked upon phospholipase C inhibition. These results suggest a novel mechanism wherein, upon DAMGO binding, CaM is released from the receptor and activates phospholipase C. Subsequently, phospholipase C generates diacylglycerides that activate PKC⑀. In contrast, U69,593 appears to act via phosphoinositide 3-kinase, PKC, and Ca 2؉ mobilization. These signaling components were implicated based on studies with specific inhibitors and a dominant negative mutant of PKC. Collectively, our findings on acute opioid effects suggest that differences in their mechanism of signaling may contribute to the distinct outcomes on ERK modulation induced by chronic and opioids.
Rationale Several randomised controlled trials support the provision of early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) following hospitalisation for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, there is little real-world data regarding uptake, adherence and completion rates. Methods An audit was conducted to prospectively document referral, uptake, adherence and completion rates for early posthospitalisation outpatient PR in Northwest London over a 12-month period. Results Out of 448 hospital discharges for AECOPD, 90 referrals for post-hospitalisation PR were received. Only 43 patients received and completed PR (9.6% of all hospital discharges) despite a fully commissioned PR service. Conclusions Despite the strong evidence base, there are poor referral and uptake rates for early outpatient PR following hospitalisation for AECOPD, with only a small proportion of the intended target population receiving this intervention.
In community-dwelling older adults, usual gait speed over 4 m (4MGS) consistently predicts greater risk of adverse health outcomes. The aims of the present study were to assess the reliability of the 4MGS and the relationship with established health outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Test-retest and interobserver reliability of the 4MGS were measured in 80 and 58 COPD patients, respectively. In 586 COPD patients, the 4MGS, as well as forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), the incremental shuttle walk (ISW), Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were measured. Participants were stratified according to ''slow'' (,0.8 m?s -1 ) or ''normal'' 4MGS (o0.8 m?s -1 ). Intra-class correlation coefficients for test-retest and interobserver reliability were 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between 4MGS with ISW (r50.78; p,0.001) and a negative correlation with MRC dyspnoea scale and SGRQ (r5 -0.55 and -0.44; p,0.001 for both). COPD patients with slow 4MGS had significantly reduced ISW and higher MRC dyspnoea scale and SGRQ than those with preserved walking speed, despite similar FEV1 % predicted.The 4MGS is reliable in COPD, correlates with exercise capacity, dyspnoea and health-related quality of life, and has potential as a simple assessment tool in COPD. @ERSpublications The 4-metre gait speed test is reliable and valid as a simple assessment tool in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
BackgroundThe Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) is a simple 10-item, health-related quality of life questionnaire (HRQoL) with good psychometric properties. However, little data exists regarding the responsiveness of the CCQ to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) or the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The study aims were to assess the responsiveness of the CCQ to PR, to compare the responsiveness of the CCQ to other HRQoL questionnaires and to provide estimates for the MCID. Methods The CCQ, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) were measured in 261 patients with COPD before and after outpatient PR. Pre to post PR changes and Cohen's effect size were calculated. Changes in CCQ were compared with changes in other HRQoL questionnaires. Using an anchor-based approach and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the CCQ change cutoffs that identified patients achieving the known MCID for other health status questionnaires with PR were identified. Results The CCQ, SGRQ, CRQ and CAT all significantly improved with PR with an effect size of −0.39, −0.33, 0.62 and −0.25, respectively. CCQ change correlated significantly with change in SGRQ, CRQ and CAT (r=0.48, 0.54, respectively; all p<0.001). ROC curves consistently identified a CCQ change cutoff of −0.4 as the best discriminating value to identify the MCID for the SGRQ, CRQ and CAT (area under curve: 0.71, 0.75 and 0.77, respectively; all p<0.001). Conclusions The CCQ is responsive to PR with an estimated clinically important improvement of −0.4 points. The CCQ is a practical alternative to more timeconsuming measures of HRQoL.
species and species groups 36 4 Outside-bark form-class segmented-profile coefficients for use when total height is known, for southern tree species and species groups. .. .. .. .. .. .. 39 5 Inside-bark form-class segmented-profile coefficients for use when height to 4-inch d.0.b. top is known, for southern tree species and species groups. .. .. .. . 42 6 Outside-bark form-class segmented-profile coefficients for use when height to 4-inch d.0.b. top is known, for southern tree species and species groups. .. .. 7 Inside-bark form-class segmented-profile coefficients for use when height to 7-inch d.0.b. top (southern softwood species) or 9-inch d.0.b. top
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.