Aims and method Northern Ireland presents itself as an anomaly – a region in which only 31.8% of doctors enter into any training programme after completion of the Foundation Programme, but where Core Psychiatry has been consistently oversubscribed. Here, we aim to find what other regions can learn from this success. All doctors of any grade, working in psychiatry, who had been though the Foundation Programme were questioned on their motivations for becoming a psychiatry trainee. Results Sixty-two doctors currently working in psychiatry responded, including over 60% of current trainees, and 45% stated they had not considered a career in psychiatry before their foundation attachment. Over 80% preferred foundation placements in FY2 only, rather than in either foundation year 1 or FY2. Clinical implications This survey identifies that for the majority of people who ultimately chose to train in psychiatry, in a region that has consistently attracted candidates to core and higher level training, completion of a foundation psychiatry post was an influencing factor in this decision. A strong majority of doctors prefer the foundation psychiatry placement to be offered in FY2.
AimsEngagement with members is an important issue for the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) and an area for ongoing development. This is an issue that extends to Psychiatry trainees and the Psychiatric Trainees’ Committee (PTC) has adopted increasing engagement as one of its key aims. Divisional representatives in different areas of the UK had noted that trainees had limited knowledge of the PTC or its roles and projects both within the College and local areas. To improve this it was decided to pilot a project that established a social media platform for trainees to improve communication between the PTC, it's representatives and trainees. It was decided that Workplace (a professional version of Facebook) would be used. This had already been established in the Severn Deanery.MethodNorthern Ireland (NI) and the East of England (EoE) deaneries were selected as pilot areas for the project. Preparation for the project included collaboration with trainees from the Severn deanery and meeting with the RCPsych Digital team. A scoping questionnaire was circulated to trainees in each deanery.Following this, two closed groups were initiated on Workplace in August 2019 for Northern Ireland and East of England trainees.ResultResults from the survey sent prior to the social media pages being established indicated there was appetite among trainees for the project. The pages were established in July 2019. The pilot project was promoted by representatives.In the initial phases, approximately 40% of trainees signed up. Information regarding college and local events, committee meeting updates and training opportunities was disseminated on the platform. There was evidence of early use by trainees outside of the representative group.This however was not sustained and gradually use of the platform reduced over the pilot period, both in postings and membership. A further questionnaire circulated in July 2020 highlighted trainees’ concerns relating to the platform, including concerns around data protection and a high number of notifications associated with the Workplace medium. The ultimate impact on engagement was also felt to be minimal.ConclusionFollowing feedback and increasing usage costs by Workplace, it was decided not to continue with a nationwide role out of the project. COVID-19 has seen the successful use of platforms such as Microsoft Teams and these may be considered in the future, given their integration with existing trust systems.
AimsRecruitment into psychiatry remains a major issue nationally despite recent progress with the #choose psychiatry scheme. Here we look to establish why Northern Ireland (NI) has been able to have 100% fill rates by speaking to the people who have work in the frontline of psychiatry. What is done differently in NI and are there lessons that could benefit other regions?BackgroundNI presents itself as an anomaly – In a region that only attracts 31.8% of F2s to enter into any training programme, Core psychiatry has been consistently oversubscribed for many years. One difference is the allocation of trainees in the Foundation programme. NI offers psychiatry placements to 33% of F2 doctors with none in the F1 year.MethodAll doctors of any grade working in psychiatry who had been through the Foundation programme since 2006 were asked to complete a survey on their foundation experience and reasons for choosing a career in psychiatry using SurveyMonkey technology. Qualiative and quantiative data was collected and analysed.Resultin total 67 doctors from CT1 to Consultant and SAS doctors responded, including over 60% of all current trainees, providing a huge amount of information. Remarkably, 45% of psychiatry doctors working in NI surveyed hadn't considered a career in psychiatry until their foundation placement. NI is the only region in the UK that does not have an F1 placement in Psychiatry. Over 80% of doctors here feel that this is a positive. White space answers revealed other aspects of training that positively influenced them to choose psychiatry including a reputation for high quality training, as well as close links between the local medical school, the local brach of the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the NI deanery.ConclusionThis study is the first to examine the reasons behind psychiatry's success in NI. The quality of the training scheme locally and presence of an excellent training to service provision balance were also mentioned. This study supports the presence of psychiatry in the F2 year only.
AimsShannon Clinic was established as the regional secure unit in Northern Ireland in 2005 and provides medium secure care to Northern Ireland's population of 1.8 million. Previous research has shown that inpatient admissions are shorter when compared to other secure units. Northern Ireland has less secure beds per population than the other UK nations, which can be a driver for shorter hospital stays. This review was undertaken to examine if shorter inpatient stays were associated with poorer outcomes.MethodAll the discharges from Shannon Clinic to the Southern Health and Social Care Trust were reviewed over a period of 10 years (2009-2019). The outcome measures examined were mortality, readmission rate and reoffending rate. Crude rates for these were calculated. To allow for comparison, these rates were compared to the systematic review findings of Fazel et al (2016), which was an international review examining patient outcomes following discharge from secure hospitals.DUNDRUM 1 Triage Security scores for the patient group were also reviewed, to ensure a sample representative of patients needing medium secure care.Result41 patients had been discharged during this period. DUNDRUM 1 Triage Security scores ranged from 2.44 to 3.2.The average length of admission was 415.5 days. This is shorter than the average reported by Fazel et al (2016).The crude rates for all of the variables calculated (mortality, readmission to hospital and reoffending) for patients discharged from Shannon to the trust were less of those reported in the systematic review by Fazel et al (2016).ConclusionThis review suggests that patient outcomes are not negatively impacted by shorter inpatient stays in secure hospitals. A possible reason for this is the regional model of care approach, which helps ensure continuity and safe management of the transition between secure care and the community. In addition, there is close multidisciplinary working with supported living providers in the trust area to ensure patients' needs are met.Following this initial review, there are now plans to review discharge outcomes for all patients discharged during this period. There are five trust areas in total in Northern Ireland so this will allow for comparison across the region.The review has also been used within the unit to develop information leaflets for patients at admission and posters for display in the unit. We hope this will provide clarity to patients about secure care and a sense of optimism from the start of their admission.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.