OBJECTIVES:We performed two 24-week double-blind trials (REDUCE-1 and -2 (Registration Endoscopic Studies to Determine Ulcer Formation of HZT-501 Compared with Ibuprofen: Efficacy and Safety Studies)) to assess whether double-dose famotidine given in a single-tablet combination with ibuprofen (HZT-501) significantly reduces gastric and duodenal ulcers as compared with ibuprofen.METHODS:Patients (40–80 years) requiring daily non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for ≥6 months with no prior ulcer complications, negative H. pylori stool test, and baseline endoscopy showing no ulcers and <5 erosions were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to HZT-501 or identical-appearing ibuprofen 800 mg tablets thrice daily. Study endoscopies were done at 8, 16, and 24 weeks. After unblinding and initial analyses, 12 patients were found to be misclassified as having gastric ulcers based on the adjudication of endoscopy reports, and analyses were re-run.RESULTS:In REDUCE-1, the primary end point analysis of gastric ulcers at 24 weeks with HZT-501 vs. ibuprofen was 12.7% vs. 22.9% (P=0.0044) in the post-adjudication analysis. In REDUCE-2, the primary end point analysis of upper gastrointestinal (GI) ulcers was 13.0% vs. 20.5% (P=0.0587) in the post-adjudication analysis. Prespecified pooled analyses showed significantly fewer gastric (12.5% vs. 20.7%) and duodenal ulcers (1.1% vs. 5.1%) with HZT-501 vs. ibuprofen. Proportional hazards analysis of multiple potential risk factors showed the risk ratio of upper GI ulcers with HZT-501 vs. ibuprofen was 0.46, 95% confidence interval was 0.34–0.61.CONCLUSIONS:Combined results of the REDUCE studies indicate that double-dose famotidine plus ibuprofen, given as a combination tablet, decreases endoscopic upper GI ulcers as compared with ibuprofen alone.

CB (0.5 microg/mL) administered via convection-enhanced delivery before standard radiochemotherapy seems to be well tolerated in adults with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas. Further clinical study assessment is warranted.

Purpose: To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of liposome-entrapped paclitaxel easy-to-use (LEP-ETU) and to characterize the relationship between LEP-ETU concentrations and the time course of neutropenia in cancer patients. Experimental Design: LEP-ETU was administered to 88 patients and 63 were evaluable for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis following 1.5-and 3-h infusions every 3 weeks (q3w; dose range, 135-375 mg/m 2 ). MTD was identified using a 3 + 3, up-and-down dose-finding algorithm. PK/PD modeling was done to describe the temporal relationship between paclitaxel concentrations and neutrophil count. Simulations assessed the influence of dose and schedule on neutropenia severity to help guide dose selection. Results: The MTD of LEP-ETU was identified as 325 mg/m 2 . DLTs occurring at 375 mg/m 2 consisted of febrile neutropenia and neuropathy. The C max and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of LEP-ETU were less than proportional with increasing dose. The PK/PD model showed that LEP-ETU inhibition of neutrophil proliferation was 9.1% per 10 Ag/mL of total paclitaxel concentration. The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia increased from 33% to 42% across the dose range of 275 to 325 mg/m 2 q3w. For a dose of 110 mg/m 2 given weekly, grade 4 neutropenia was estimated to be 16% compared with 42% for the same total dose administered q3w. Conclusions: LEP-ETU can be administered safely at higher doses than Taxol. Modeling and simulation studies predict that 325 mg/m 2 LEP-ETU q3w provides acceptable neutropenic events relative to those observed at 175 mg/m 2 Taxol q3w. A 275 mg/m 2 dose may offer an improved therapeutic index.

Aims Endothelins (ETs) may play a role in the pathogenesis of a variety of cardiovascular diseases. The present study was designed to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the orally active ETA selective receptor antagonist ABT-627 in healthy humans. Methods Healthy volunteers were included in two studies with cross-over design. Subjects received single or multiple dose (an 8 day period) administration of oral ABT-627 or matched placebo, in a dose range of 0.2±40 mg. The pharmacokinetics of ABT-627 were described and its effects on systemic haemodynamics under resting conditions and on forearm vasoconstriction in response to ET-1 were assessed. Results ABT-627 was generally well tolerated in both studies, with transient headache being the most reported adverse event (in 62% vs 4% during placebo, P<0.05, for Study 1 and in 42% vs 60%, P=0.2, for Study 2). ABT-627 was rapidly absorbed, reaching maximum plasma levels at < 1 h post dose. Single dose ABT-627, at a dose of 20 and 40 mg, inhibited ET-1 induced forearm vasoconstriction at 8 h post dose. Eight days ABT-627 treatment, at a dose level of 5 mg and above, also effectively blocked forearm vasoconstriction to ET-1. ABT-627 caused a signi®cant reduction in peripheral resistance as compared with placebo (16t1 vs 19t1, 18t2 vs 23t3, 15t1 vs 17t1 AU at 1, 5, 20 mg in Study 2) with only a mild decrease in blood pressure (79t2 vs 84t3, 80t4 vs 90t5, 75t3 vs 79t1 at 1, 5, 20 mg in Study 2). ABT-627 caused a moderate dose-dependent increase in circulating immunoreactive ET levels (a maximal increase of 50% over baseline at the 20 mg dose level). Conclusions The oral ETA receptor blocker ABT-627 is well tolerated, rapidly absorbed, effectively blocks ET-1 induced vasoconstriction and causes a decrease in total peripheral resistance and mean arterial pressure. Our data suggest that ABT-627 may be a valuable tool in treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Objective In vitro, in vivo, and open‐label studies suggest that interferon gamma (IFN‐γ 1b) may improve clinical features in Friedreich Ataxia through an increase in frataxin levels. The present study evaluates the efficacy and safety of IFN‐γ 1b in the treatment of Friedreich Ataxia through a double‐blind, multicenter, placebo‐controlled trial. Methods Ninety‐two subjects with FRDA between 10 and 25 years of age were enrolled. Subjects received either IFN‐γ 1b or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS). Results No difference was noted between the groups after 6 months of treatment in the mFARS or secondary outcome measures. No change was noted in buccal cell or whole blood frataxin levels. However, during an open‐label extension period, subjects had a more stable course than expected based on natural history data. Conclusions This study provides no direct evidence for a beneficial effect of IFN‐γ1b in FRDA. The modest stabilization compared to natural history data leaves open the possibility that longer studies may demonstrate benefit.

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of highly stable PEGylated liposomes encapsulating chemotherapeutic drugs has previously been effective against malignant glioma xenografts. We have developed a novel, convectable non-PEGylated liposomal formulation that can be used to encapsulate both the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan (topoCED TM ) and paramagnetic gadodiamide (gadoCED TM ), providing an ideal basis for real-time monitoring of drug distribution. Tissue retention of topo-CED following single CED administration was significantly improved relative to free topotecan. At a dose of 10 lg (0.5 mg/ml), topoCED had a half-life in brain of approximately 1 day and increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 28-fold over free topotecan (153.8 vs. 5.5 lg day/g). The combination of topoCED and gadoCED was found to co-convect well in both naïve rat brain and malignant glioma xenografts (correlation coefficients 0.97-0.99). In a U87MG cell assay, the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) of topoCED was approximately 0.8 lM at 48 and 72 h; its concentration-time curves were similar to free topotecan and unaffected by gadoCED. In a U87MG intracranial rat xenograft model, a two-dose CED regimen of topoCED co-infused with gadoCED greatly increased median overall survival at dose levels of 0.5 mg/ml (29.5 days) and 1.0 mg/ml (33.0 days) vs. control (20.0 days; P \ 0.0001 for both comparisons). TopoCED at higher concentrations (1.6 mg/ ml) co-infused with gadoCED showed no evidence of histopathological changes attributable to either agent. The positive results of tissue pharmacokinetics, co-convection, cytotoxicity, efficacy, and lack of toxicity of topoCED in a clinically meaningful dose range, combined with an ideal matched-liposome paramagnetic agent, gadoCED, implicates further clinical applications of this therapy in the treatment of malignant glioma.

(2015) Onset and durability of pain relief in knee osteoarthritis: Pooled results from two placebo trials of naproxen/esomeprazole combination and celecoxib, The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 43:3, 200-212, DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2015 AbstractObjective. To further characterize time-to-first pain relief, effect size, correlations between various outcome measures and durability of relief for single-tablet naproxen 500 mg/esomeprazole 20 mg (NAP/ESO) given twice daily and celecoxib (CEL) (200 mg) given once daily versus placebo in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods. Unpublished data from two double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trials in which patients aged ‡50 years with knee OA were randomized to NAP/ESO (n = 487), CEL (n = 486) or placebo (n = 246) were pooled (NCT00664560 and NCT00665431). Acute response endpoints: 1) Time to first significant pain response, 2) Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale and 3) American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ) scores. Sustainability endpoints: 1) Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) and 2) WOMAC Stiffness, Pain and Total scores; and Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 6 and 12 weeks. Effect sizes for all measures were calculated. Rescue pain medication use also was analyzed, as was the correlation of WOMAC to RAPID3. Results. NAP/ESO produced statistically significant decreases in WOMAC Pain on Days 2-7 and at Weeks 6 and 12 (all p < 0.05); most APS-POQ pain assessments with NAP/ESO were significantly improved on Days 2-7 compared with placebo (all p < 0.05). A good or excellent response occurred in a median of 6 days. RAPID3 and WOMAC total/stiffness/function/PGA scores decreased significantly at Weeks 6 and 12 (all p < 0.05). Placebo-adjusted WOMAC pain effect sizes were 0.44, 0.34 and 0.25 at Day 7, week 6 and week 12, respectively. RAPID3 to WOMAC total and WOMAC pain to RAPID3: Pain scores were highly correlated at 6 and 12 weeks (correlation coefficients >0.80). No significant differences in overall responses were found between CEL and NAP/ESO. Conclusion. Naproxen/esomeprazole produced a significant absolute moderate early pain response, which was maintained for 12 weeks. RAPID3 was found to be highly correlated with the typical OA measure (WOMAC) and might be a useful clinical tool for measuring NSAID response. NCT00664560: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00664560, NCT00665431: https:// www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00665431.

ObjectivesLike morning stiffness, fatigue is a common, debilitating symptom of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Delayed-release (DR) prednisone is designed for evening administration (approximately 22:00) and releases 4 h later to coincide with the rise of nocturnal inflammatory cytokines associated with development of morning stiffness. The impact of DR prednisone on fatigue and other related patient-reported outcomes was analysed with data obtained from the Circadian Administration of Prednisone in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAPRA) 2 study.MethodsPatients with symptomatic RA (n=350) despite treatment with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) were randomised 2:1 to receive additional therapy with DR prednisone 5 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Fatigue was assessed using validated instruments: the fatigue scale of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) and the vitality domain of the Short Form-36 (SF-36). General quality of life was assessed using the general score and individual domains of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and SF-36.ResultsThe change from baseline to week 12 in FACIT-F score was statistically significantly different with DR prednisone/DMARD (3.8) versus placebo/DMARD (1.6; difference 2.2, p=0.0032). Improvement in FACIT-F score correlated positively with clinical response. Compared with placebo/DMARD, DR prednisone/DMARD showed a significantly greater improvement in SF-36 vitality score (5.6, p=0.001), physical component of SF-36 (2.3, p=0.0003) and general score with FACT-G (2.6, p=0.0233).ConclusionsDR prednisone in addition to a DMARD significantly improves fatigue and other aspects of health-related quality of life in patients with symptomatic RA compared with DMARD treatment alone.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov NCT00650078.