Context:Pathologists grade follicular lymphoma (FL) cases by selecting 10, random high power fields (HPFs), counting the number of centroblasts (CBs) in these HPFs under the microscope and then calculating the average CB count for the whole slide. Previous studies have demonstrated that there is high inter-reader variability among pathologists using this methodology in grading.Aims:The objective of this study was to explore if newly available digital reading technologies can reduce inter-reader variability.Settings and Design:In this study, we considered three different reading conditions (RCs) in grading FL: (1) Conventional (glass-slide based) to establish the baseline, (2) digital whole slide viewing, (3) digital whole slide viewing with selected HPFs. Six board-certified pathologists from five different institutions read 17 FL slides in these three different RCs.Results:Although there was relative poor consensus in conventional reading, with lack of consensus in 41.2% of cases, which was similar to previously reported studies; we found that digital reading with pre-selected fields improved the inter-reader agreement, with only 5.9% lacking consensus among pathologists.Conclusions:Digital whole slide RC resulted in the worst concordance among pathologists while digital whole slide reading selected HPFs improved the concordance. Further studies are underway to determine if this performance can be sustained with a larger dataset and our automated HPF and CB detection algorithms can be employed to further improve the concordance.
Currently risk stratification and subsequent choice of therapy for follicular lymphoma (FL) relies on histological grading that is based on the number of centroblasts per average high power microscopic field (HPF). Centroblasts are counted manually in ten random HPFs and are expressed as an average number of centroblasts per HPF. Manual centroblast counting is difficult, labor intensive and prone to an individual pathologist’s bias. The resulting poor reproducibility of FL grading has been well documented in the literature. In this abstract, we report development of a computer based image analysis program that will assist pathologists with reliable and reproducible morphological grading of FL. The inputs to the computerized system are immunohistochemical (IHC) and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections digitized at 40x magnification with a whole-slide scanner. The system consists of successive stages, including detection of follicles, registration of IHC and H&E-stained images, segmentation of cells and classification of cells as centroblasts and non-centroblasts. We extracted both color and texture features to detect the follicles from HIS-stained images followed by a clustering step, which groups the pixels as background, inter-follicular region and follicles, using the K-means clustering algorithm. This is followed by a morphologic post-processing step to remove the noisy regions and smooth the boundaries of the follicles. A manual registration step is performed to superimpose the detected follicle boundaries on H&E image. Within the identified follicle regions, we have trained the computer to differentiate the centroblasts from non-centroblast cells out of a pool of cells marked by an experienced pathologist. A vector of features combining clinical characteristics and statistical descriptors are then constructed from the given cells. A linear unsupervised statistical method of principle components analysis (PCA) is used to reduce the dimensionality of the feature data distribution. Then, the lower-dimensional data are grouped into centroblast and non-centroblast classes. The performance of the follicle detection system and centroblast differentiation systems are evaluated independently in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Follicle detection step was evaluated by comparing the computer generated results with results of manual microscopy. Based on 53 test images, representing FL cases and follicular hyperplasia, sensitivity and specificity values for the follicles detection were 86.1±10.4% and 92.9±5.1%, respectively. Evaluation of computer recognition of centroblasts was based on 100 cells marked by pathologist as centroblasts (41) and non-centroblast (59) in 11 designated follicular regions of H&E stained sections of four FL cases. The resulting sensitivity and specificity of centroblast identification by the computer was 92.6% and 91.38%, respectively. The high sensitivity and specificity of the developed modules of the system are promising for the further development of a computer-aided follicular lymphoma grading system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.