Gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders are associated with suboptimal nutrition in children, mainly because of malabsorption and symptoms limiting dietary intake. Apart from medical therapy, nutrition support has a crucial role in maintaining growth and improving clinical outcomes in children. Based on recent data and guidelines, this review provides an overview of nutrition assessment and specific interventions for common pediatric GI disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophageal motility disorders, gastroparesis, chronic intestinal pseudo‐obstruction, and constipation. Several approaches including diet modification, enteral nutrition (gastric vs post‐pyloric, temporary vs permanent access, bolus vs continuous), and parenteral nutrition need to be tailored based on patient's nutrition and clinical assessment.
Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) negatively affect children's quality of life and health care costs. It has been proposed that alteration of gut serotonin leads to gastrointestinal dysmotility, visceral hypersensitivity, altered gastrointestinal secretions, and brain-gut dysfunction. Cyproheptadine, a serotonin antagonist, has been shown to be a potentially effective and safe treatment option in children who meet the clinical criteria for FGIDs. Well-designed multicenter trials with long-term follow-up are needed to further investigate its efficacy. [Pediatr Ann. 2017;46(3):e120-e125.]
BackgroundOur study evaluated progression of and identified potential factors contributing to outcomes of ROME III defined-functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) in children treated symptomatically in a biopsychosocial model of care with a long-term follow-up.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of pediatric patients who were diagnosed with ROME III defined-FGIDs including functional abdominal pain, functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome and abdominal migraine. Patients were managed symptomatically in a biopsychosocial model of care from the time of initial diagnosis. Demographics, management, progression and response to treatment assessed as complete, partial, and no improvement were reviewed.ResultsTwo hundred fifty-eight patients were included with mean age of 10.6 years, female 55.4%, mean number of encounters 3.3 visits, and mean follow-up was 18.7 months (range 2 - 59, SD 15.8). Diagnoses were functional abdominal pain 45%, irritable bowel syndrome 20.9%, multiple 13.2%, functional dyspepsia 12.8%, and abdominal migraine 8.1%. Investigations were performed in most patients: laboratory studies in 93.4% (non-contributory abnormal 23.6%), imaging studies in 45.3% (non-contributory abnormal 5%) and endoscopies in 43.0% (non-contributory abnormal 1.2%). Treatment included medication in 93.7%, and surgery in 1.9% (normal pathology). There were new functional gastrointestinal diagnosis in 11.6%, evolution of FGIDs, from one to another in 12.0%, and recurrence found in 35.7% of patients. There were 60.1% patients in the complete improvement group (CIG) and 39.1% in the partial/no improvement group (PIG/NIG). No statistical difference was found between CIG and PIG/NIG regarding demographics or evaluation. PIG/NIG had more encounters (mean 3.63 vs. 3.11; P = 0.03), had non-contributory lab abnormalities (34.4% vs. 20.0%; P = 0.01), needed more endoscopies (52.4% vs. 36.8%; P = 0.02), required more treatment changes (mean 1.41 vs. 0.81; P < 0.01) and developed new functional gastrointestinal diagnoses (19.4% vs. 6.5%; P < 0.01) with long-term follow-up.ConclusionsPatients with ROME III defined-FGIDs who experience partial or no improvement with treatment develop new FGID diagnosis, need more number of follow-up visits, require more number of endoscopies, need more treatment changes, and have more non-contributory laboratory abnormalities, compared to those who experience complete improvement. Symptomatic treatment offered in a biopsychosocial model of care is possibly beneficial in managing children with FGIDs.
Esophageal dilations in children are performed by several pediatric and adult professionals. We aim to summarize improvements in safety and new technology used for the treatment of complex and refractory strictures, including triamcinolone injection, endoscopic electro-incisional therapy, topical mitomycin-C application, stent placement, functional lumen imaging probe assisted dilation, and endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure in the pediatric population.
Esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) are rare birth anomalies typically requiring corrective surgery over the first few months of life. Esophageal surgery can lead to a life-threatening anastomotic leak. Esophageal wound vacuums have seen increased use in adults and one cohort of children as a therapeutic modality. This case study explores a tertiary care pediatric hospital's introductory experience in utilizing this technique. A 19-month-old male underwent staged repair for esophageal atresia/ tracheoesophageal fistula requiring an esophageal stricture resection with primary anastomosis. An anastomotic leak was successfully managed with wound vacuums. Our experiences highlighted the need for individualized treatment plans with this therapy based on feeding capabilities, side effects of the vacuum, placement method, and replacement strategies.
An 11-year-old asymptomatic boy was admitted after ingesting 3 magnets. X-rays demonstrated 3 stacked 4 mm metallic objects in the stomach, which quickly moved to the small bowel. Serial imaging demonstrated migration to and stasis in the right hemipelvis (Fig. 1A). After bowel clean-out, ileocolonoscopy was performed. Intraoperative fluoroscopy demonstrated objects in the right pelvis, but not in the bowel lumen (Fig. 1B). The asymptomatic patient was discharged with plans for small bowel enteroscopy. Before the procedure, a pelvic computed tomography (CT) localized the magnets to the appendix (Fig. 2A). An appendectomy was performed, noting the objects attraction to the surgical instruments. Pathology showed an appendix with focal mucosal erosion but without significant inflammation and 3 embedded magnets (Fig. 2B).Most ingested materials spontaneously pass within 3.6 days (1). Stasis of small swallowed magnets in the right hemipelvis and an inability to visualize them on endoscopy should raise concern of appendiceal entrapment and consideration of CT. Although rare, a variety of entrapped appendiceal foreign bodies have been reported, including pins and razor blades (2,3). This is the first case of magnets in the appendix, though 1 report suspected magnets causing perforated appendicitis and ileocecal fistula (4). As obstructing foreign bodies may precipitate appendicitis, endoscopic removal or appendectomy is recommended (5).
Juvenile polyps are the most common gastrointestinal polyps in childhood. Typically, they are located in the colon and present with intermittent and painless hematochezia. A few case reports have described juvenile polyps in the small intestine, all presenting as intussusception requiring surgery. We report an isolated juvenile polyp in the small intestine presenting with painless anemia, identified using video capsule endoscopy, and removed via enteroscopy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.