No abstract

In the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population of Israel, 11% of breast cancer and 40% of ovarian cancer are due to three inherited founder mutations in the cancer predisposition genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. For carriers of these mutations, risk-reducing salpingooophorectomy significantly reduces morbidity and mortality. Population screening for these mutations among AJ women may be justifiable if accurate estimates of cancer risk for mutation carriers can be obtained. We therefore undertook to determine risks of breast and ovarian cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers ascertained irrespective of personal or family history of cancer. Families harboring mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were ascertained by identifying mutation carriers among healthy AJ males recruited from health screening centers and outpatient clinics. Female relatives of the carriers were then enrolled and genotyped. Among the female relatives with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, cumulative risk of developing either breast or ovarian cancer by age 60 and 80, respectively, were 0.60 (± 0.07) and 0.83 (± 0.07) for BRCA1 carriers and 0.33 (± 0.09) and 0.76 (± 0.13) for BRCA2 carriers. Risks were higher in recent vs. earlier birth cohorts (P = 0.006). High cancer risks in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers identified through healthy males provide an evidence base for initiating a general screening program in the AJ population. General screening would identify many carriers who are not evaluated by genetic testing based on family history criteria. Such a program could serve as a model to investigate implementation and outcomes of population screening for genetic predisposition to cancer in other populations. genomics I nherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose to high risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Among female mutation carriers, presymptomatic surgical measures significantly reduce morbidity and mortality (1, 2). In particular, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (i.e., the removal of ovaries and fallopian tubes from a woman without ovarian cancer) reduces risk both of breast cancer and of ovarian cancer, as well as overall mortality (1). However, for many mutation carriers identified following their first cancer diagnosis, genetic testing was not previously indicated because family history did not suggest inherited cancer predisposition (3)(4)(5)6). From a prevention perspective, it is a missed opportunity to identify a woman as a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carrier only after she develops cancer.Among Ashkenazi (European) Jews (AJ), three mutations, BRCA1 185delAG, BRCA1 5382insC, and BRCA2 6174delT, account for the great majority of inherited cancer risk due to BRCA1 and BRCA2 (7). In the AJ population, 2.5% of persons carry one of these three mutations (8), and the mutations account for 11% of breast cancer (3) and 40% of ovarian cancer (9, 10). These observations suggest that genetic testing in the AJ population for these mutations fulfills WHO criteria for population screening (11, 12): The disease is an important public health burden to the target popu...

Severe jaundice leading to kernicterus or death in the newborn is the most devastating consequence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.49; G-6-PD) deficiency. We asked whether the TA repeat promoter polymorphism in the gene for uridinediphosphoglucuronate glucuronosyltransferase 1 (EC 2.4.1.17; UDPGT1), associated with benign jaundice in adults (Gilbert syndrome), increases the incidence of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in G-6-PD deficiency. DNA from term neonates was analyzed for UDPGT1 polymorphism (normal homozygotes, heterozygotes, variant homozygotes), and for G-6-PD Mediterranean deficiency. The variant UDPGT1 promoter allele frequency was similar in G-6-PD-deficient and normal neonates. Thirty (22.9%) G-6-PD deficient neonates developed serum total bilirubin > 257 mol͞liter, vs. 22 (9.2%) normals (P ‫؍‬ 0.0005). Of those with the normal homozygous UDPGT1 genotype, the incidence of hyperbilirubinemia was similar in G-6-PD-deficients and controls (9.7% and 9.9%). In contrast, in the G-6-PD-deficient neonates, those with the heterozygous or homozygous variant UDPGT1 genotype had a higher incidence of hyperbilirubinemia than corresponding controls (heterozygotes: 31.6% vs. 6.7%, P < 0.0001; variant homozygotes: 50% vs. 14.7%, P ‫؍‬ 0.02). Among G-6-PD-deficient infants the incidence of hyperbilirubinemia was greater in those with the heterozygous (31.6%, P ‫؍‬ 0.006) or variant homozygous (50%, P ‫؍‬ 0.003) UDPGT1 genotype than in normal homozygotes. In contrast, among those normal for G-6-PD, the UDPGT1 polymorphism had no significant effect (heterozygotes: 6.7%; variant homozygotes: 14.7%). Thus, neither G-6-PD deficiency nor the variant UDPGT1 promoter, alone, increased the incidence of hyperbilirubinemia, but both in combination did. This gene interaction may serve as a paradigm of the interaction of benign genetic polymorphisms in the causation of disease.

to recognize and honor her "for bold and imaginative contributions to medical science and society -exemplified by her discovery of a single gene BRCA1 that causes a … form of hereditary breast cancer …" This Viewpoint describes the application of that discovery, and suggests that populationbased screening of women for BRCA1 and BRCA2 should become a routine part of clinical practice.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are at increased risk for both breast and ovarian cancer, but estimates of lifetime risk vary widely, suggesting their penetrance is modified by other genetic and͞or environmental factors. The BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins function in DNA repair in conjunction with RAD51. A preliminary report suggested that a single nucleotide polymorphism in the 5 untranslated region of RAD51 (135C͞G) increases breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. To investigate this effect we studied 257 female Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of one of the common BRCA1 (185delAG, 5382insC) or BRCA2 (6174delT) mutations. Of this group, 164 were affected with breast and͞or ovarian cancer and 93 were unaffected. RAD51 genotyping was performed on all subjects. Among BRCA1 carriers, RAD51-135C frequency was similar in healthy and affected women [6.1% (3 of 49) and 9.9% (12 of 121), respectively], and RAD-135C did not influence age of cancer diagnosis [Hazard ratio (HR) ‫؍‬ 1.18 for disease in RAD51-135C heterozygotes, not significant]. However, in BRCA2 carriers, RAD51-135C heterozygote frequency in affected women was 17.4% (8 of 46) compared with 4.9% (2 of 41) in unaffected women (P ‫؍‬ 0.07). Survival analysis in BRCA2 carriers showed RAD51-135C increased risk of breast and͞or ovarian cancer with an HR of 4.0 [95% confidence interval 1.6 -9.8, P ‫؍‬ 0.003]. This effect was largely due to increased breast cancer risk with an HR of 3.46 (95% confidence interval 1.3-9.2, P ‫؍‬ 0.01) for breast cancer in BRCA2 carriers who were RAD51-135C heterozygotes. RAD51 status did not affect ovarian cancer risk. These results show RAD51-135C is a clinically significant modifier of BRCA2 penetrance, specifically in raising breast cancer risk at younger ages. G erm-line mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes increase susceptibility for both breast and ovarian cancer. Penetrance of these mutations is incomplete and age-dependent, thus cancer risk in carriers continues to increase with age even though the mean age of cancer diagnosis is younger in BRCA1͞ BRCA2 carriers compared with noncarriers (1). Estimates of penetrance have varied widely, perhaps as a result of different ascertainment schemes and͞or allelic effects. In families ascertained for multiple affected individuals suitable for linkage analysis, lifetime cancer risk (by age 70) was 85% for breast cancer in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (2, 3), 63% for ovarian cancer in BRCA1 carriers (2), and 27% for ovarian cancer in BRCA2 carriers (3). Significantly lower risk estimates were obtained in studies performed in less selected families or at the population level, with a 36-56% lifetime risk for breast cancer (4-7) and a 16% lifetime risk for ovarian cancer (5). These studies were performed in specific ethnic groups (Ashkenazi Jewish and the Iceland population) that harbor a limited number of specific mutations and could therefore be representative of these alleles, rather than reflect the general penetrance of BRCA1͞BRCA2 mutations. Such differences suggest that penetrance of BRCA1...

Streamlined BRCA screening results in high uptake, very high satisfaction, and no excess psychosocial harm. Proactive recruitment captured older women less selected for FH. Further research is necessary to target younger women and assess other populations.Genet Med advance online publication 08 December 2016.

Worsening of TI after PPI was not rare and was observed more often in older patients, with abnormal LV relaxation and who developed pulmonary hypertension after the procedure.

BACKGROUND Smokers are generally more susceptible to infectious respiratory diseases and are at higher risk of developing severe complications from these infections. Conflicting reports exist regarding the impact of smoking on the risk of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. METHODS We carried out a population-based study among over 3,000,000 adult members of Clalit Health Services, the largest health provider in Israel. Since the beginning of the disease outbreak, 114,545 individuals underwent RT-PCR testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and 4.0% had positive results. We performed a case-control study among patients who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing, to assess the impact of smoking on infection incidence and severity. Individuals with positive tests were matched in a 1:5 ratio to individuals tested negative, of the same sex, age, and ethnicity/religion. Conditional logistic regressions were performed to evaluate odds ratios for current and previous smoking on the risk of testing positive. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed among patients infected with COVID-19 to estimate the association between smoking and fatal or severe disease requiring ventilation. Regressions were performed with and without adjustment for preexisting medical conditions. RESULTS In the matched cohort, current smokers (9.8%) were significantly less prevalent among members tested positive compared to the general population, and to matched members tested negative (19.4%, P<0.001). Current smoking was associated with significantly reduced odds ratio (OR) for testing positive OR=0.457 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.407-0.514). Among patients tested positive, there was no evidence of significantly increased risk of developing severe or fatal disease. CONCLUSION The risk of infection by COVID-19 appears to be reduced by half among current smokers. This intriguing finding may reveal unique infection mechanisms present for COVID-19 which may be targeted to combat the disease and reduce its infection rate.