We study the final stages of the common envelope (CE) evolution and find that a substantial fraction of the ejected mass does not reach the escape velocity. To reach this conclusion we use a self‐similar solution under simplifying assumptions. Most of the gravitational energy of a companion white dwarf (WD) is released in the envelope of a massive asymptotic giant branch (AGB) or the red giant branch (RGB) star in a very short time. This rapid energy release forms a blast wave in the envelope. We follow the blast wave propagation from the centre of the AGB outwards, and show that ∼1–10 per cent of the ejected envelope remains bound to the remnant binary system. We suggest that due to angular momentum conservation and further interaction with the binary system, the fall‐back material forms a circumbinary disc around the post‐AGB Core and the companion WD. The interaction of the circumbinary disc with the binary system will reduce the orbital separation much more than expected of the dynamical phase (where the envelope is ejected) of the CE alone. The smaller orbital separation favours a merger at the end of the CE phase or a short time after, while the core is still hot. This is another channel for the formation of a massive WD with super‐Chandrasekhar mass that might explode as a Type Ia supernova. We term this the core‐degenerate (CD) scenario.

We reconstruct the evolution of η Car in the last two centuries under the assumption that the two 19th century eruptions were triggered by periastron passages and through this reconstruction constrain the binary parameters. The beginning of the lesser eruption (LE) at the end of the 19th century occurred when the system was very close to periastron passage, suggesting that the secondary triggered the LE. We assume that the 1838-1858 great eruption (GE) was triggered by a periastron passage as well. We also assume that mass transferred from the primary to the secondary star accounts for the extra energy of the GE. With these assumptions we constrain the total mass of the binary system to be M = M 1 + M 2 250 M . These higher than commonly used masses better match the observed luminosity with stellar evolutionary tracks. Including mass loss by the two stars and mass transfer from the primary to the secondary we obtain a good match of periastron passages to the two peaks in the light curve of the GE. Based on these findings and a similar behavior of P Cygni, we speculate that major luminous blue variable eruptions are triggered by stellar companions and that in extreme cases a short duration event with a huge mass transfer rate can lead to a bright transient event on timescales of weeks to months (a "supernova impostor").

We argue that the multiple shells of circumstellar material (CSM) and the supernovae (SN) ejecta interaction with the CSM starting 59 days after the explosion of the Type Ia SN (SN Ia) PTF 11kx, are best described by a violent prompt merger. In this prompt merger scenario the common envelope (CE) phase is terminated by a merger of a WD companion with the hot core of a massive asymptotic giant (AGB) star. In most cases the WD is disrupted and accreted onto the more massive core. However, in the rare cases where the merger takes place when the WD is denser than the core, the core will be disrupted and accreted onto the cooler WD. In such cases the explosion might occur with no appreciable delay, i.e., months to years after the termination of the CE phase. This, we propose, might be the evolutionary route that could lead to the explosion of PTF 11kx. This scenario can account for the very massive CSM within ∼ 1000 AU of the exploding PTF 11kx star, for the presence of hydrogen, and for the presence of shells in the CSM.

We present surprising similarities between some bipolar planetary nebulae (PNe) and eruptive objects with peak luminosity between novae and supernovae. The later group is termed ILOT for intermediate luminosity optical transients (other terms are intermediate luminosity red transients and red novae). In particular we compare the PN NGC 6302 and the pre-PNe OH231.8+4.2, M1-92 and IRAS 22036+5306 with the ILOT NGC 300 OT2008-1. These similarities lead us to propose that the lobes of some (but not all) PNe and pre-PNe were formed in an ILOT event (or several close sub-events). We suggest that in both types of objects the several months long outbursts are powered by mass accretion onto a main-sequence companion from an AGB (or extreme-AGB) star. Jets launched by an accretion disk around the main-sequence companion shape the bipolar lobes. Some of the predictions that result from our comparison is that the ejecta of some ILOTs will have morphologies similar to those of bipolar PNe, and that the central stars of the PNe that were shaped by ILOTs should have a main-sequence binary companion with an eccentric orbit of several years long period.

We apply the previously suggested accretion model for the behavior of the supermassive binary system η Car close to periastron passages. In that model it is assumed that for ∼ 10 weeks near periastron passages one star is accreting mass from the slow dense wind blown by the other star. We find that the secondary, the less massive star, accretes ∼ 2 × 10 −6 M ⊙ . This mass possesses enough angular momentum to form a disk, or a belt, around the secondary. The viscous time is too long for the establishment of equilibrium, and the belt must be dissipated as its mass is being blown in the reestablished secondary wind. This processes requires about half a year, which we identify with the recovery phase of η Car. We show that radiation pressure, termed radiative braking, cannot prevent accretion. In addition to using the commonly assumed binary model for η Car, we also examine alternative models where the stellar masses are larger, and/or the less massive secondary blows the slow dense wind, while the primary blows the tenuous fast wind and accretes mass for ∼ 10 week near periastron passages. We end by some predictions for the next event (

We propose that the intermediate luminosity optical transient NGC 300 OT2008-1 was powered by a mass transfer episode from an extreme Asymptotic Giant Branch star to a Main Sequence companion. We find a remarkable similarity of the shapes of the light curves of the several months long NGC 300 OT2008-1 outburst, of the three months long 2002 enigmatic outburst of the B star V838 Mon, and the twenty-years long Great Eruption of the massive binary system Eta Carinae that occurred in the 19th century. Their similar decline properties hint to a common energy source: a gravitational energy that is released by accretion onto a main sequence star. These events populate a specific strip in the total energy vs. outburst duration diagram. The strip is located between novae and supernovae. We add recent transient events to that diagram and find them to occupy the same strip. This suggests that some intermediate luminosity optical transients are powered by accretion onto a compact object (not necessarily a main sequence star). These transients are expected to produce bipolar ejecta as a result of the geometry of the accretion process.

We propose that the major 2012 outburst of the supernova impostor SN 2009ip was powered by an extended and repeated interaction between the Luminous Blue Variable (LBV) and a more compact companion. Motivated by the recent analysis of Margutti et al. (2013) of ejected clumps and shells we consider two scenarios. In both scenarios the major 2012b outburst with total (radiated + kinetic) energy of ∼ 5×10 49 erg was powered by accretion of ∼ 2-5 M ⊙ onto the companion during a periastron passage (the first passage) of the binary system approximately 20 days before the observed maximum of the light curve. In the first scenario, the surviving companion scenario, the companion was not destructed and still exists in the system after the outburst. It ejected partial shells (or collimated outflows or clumps) for two consecutive periastron passages after the major one. The orbital period was reduced from ∼ 38 days to ∼ 25 days as a result of the mass transfer process that took place during the first periastron passage. In the second scenario, the merger scenario, some partial shells/clumps were ejected also in a second periastron passage that took place ∼ 20 days after the first one. After this second periastron passage the companion dived too deep into the LBV envelope to launch more outflows, and merged with the LBV.

We propose a new type of repeating transient outburst initiated by a neutron star (NS) entering the envelope of an evolved massive star, accreting envelope material and subsequently launching jets which interact with their surroundings. This interaction is the result of either a rapid expansion of the primary star due to an instability in its core near the end of its nuclear evolution, or due to a dynamical process which rapidly brings the NS into the primary star. The ejecta can reach velocities of ≈ 10 4 km s −1 despite not being a supernova, and might explain such velocities in the 2011 outburst of the luminous blue variable progenitor of SN 2009ip. The typical transient duration and kinetic energy are weeks to months, and up to ≈ 10 51 erg, respectively. The interaction of a NS with a giant envelope might be a phase in the evolution of the progenitors of most NS-NS binary systems that later undergo a merger event. If the NS spirals in all the way to the core of the primary star and brings about its complete disruption we term this a 'common envelope jets supernova' (CEJSN), which is a possible explanation for the peculiar supernova iPTF14hls. For a limited interaction of the NS with the envelope we get a less luminous transient, which we term a CEJSN impostor.