Outcome analyses for patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NET) after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are still limited, especially with regard to the impact of the Ki-67 index. Using a single-center analysis, we aimed to establish predictors of survival. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 74 patients who had metastatic GEP NET and underwent PRRT with 177 Lu-octreotate (mean activity of 7.9 GBq per cycle, aimed at 4 treatment cycles at standard intervals of 3 mo). Patients (33 with pancreatic NET and 41 with nonpancreatic GEP NET) had unresectable metastatic disease graded as G1 or G2 (G1/G2) and documented morphologic or clinical progression within less than 12 mo or uncontrolled disease under somatostatin analog treatment. Responses were evaluated according to modified Southwest Oncology Group criteria. Potential predictors of survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier curve method (log-rank test) and multivariate analysis (P , 0.05). Results: The response rates were 36.5% partial response, 17.6% minor response, 35.1% stable disease, and 10.8% progressive disease for the entire cohort; 54.5% partial response, 18.2% minor response, 18.2% stable disease, and 9.1% progressive disease for pancreatic NET; and 22.0% partial response, 17.1% minor response, 48.8% stable disease, and 12.2% progressive disease for nonpancreatic GEP NET. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 26 mo (95% confidence interval, 18.3-33.7) and 55 mo (95% confidence interval, 48.8-61.2), respectively. Besides the Ki-67 index, a Karnofsky performance score of less than or equal to 70%, a hepatic tumor burden of greater than or equal to 25%, and a baseline plasma level of neuron-specific enolase of greater than 15 ng/mL independently predicted shorter overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.1-3.1). Patients with a Ki-67 index of greater than 10% still had median progression-free survival and overall survival of 19 and 34 mo, respectively. Conclusion:The results of this study demonstrated the favorable response and long-term outcome of patients with G1/G2 GEP NET after PRRT. Independent predictors of survival were the Ki-67 index, the patient's performance status (Karnofsky performance scale score), the tumor burden, and the baseline neuron-specific enolase level. Even patients with a Ki-67 index of greater than 10% seemed to benefit from PRRT, with a good response and a notable long-term outcome. We present the first evidence, to our knowledge, that even in patients with metastatic disease the distinction between G1 and G2-in particular, between G1 (Ki-67 index of 1%-2%) and low-range G2 (Ki-67 index of 3%-10%)-provides prognostic stratification. Pept ide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a highly efficient modality for the systemic treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NET) (1-4). The compound [ 177 Lu-DOTA 0 ,Tyr 3 ]octreotate ( 177 Lu-octreotate) is frequently used for this purpose. Outstanding response and survival data are ava...

The outstanding response rates and survival outcomes suggest that PRRT is highly effective in advanced G1/2 pNET when compared to data of other treatment modalities. Independent predictors of survival are the tumour proliferation index, the patient's performance status, tumour burden and baseline plasma NSE level.

Myelosuppression may be the dose-limiting toxicity in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, severity, and reversibility of long-term hematotoxicity in a large cohort of patient undergoing PRRT with 177 Lu-octreotate for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. The impact of potential risk factors, including initial cytopenia, advanced bone metastatic disease, previous chemotherapy, and cumulative administered activity, and the protective effects of splenectomy were of particular interest. Methods: A total of 632 PRRT courses were performed in 203 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. A mean activity of 7.9 GBq of 177 Lu-octreotate was administered per treatment cycle, with a goal of 4 courses at standard intervals of 3 mo. Hematologic parameters were determined before each treatment course, at 2-to 4-wk intervals between the courses, 8-12 wk after the last course of PRRT, and at 3-month intervals for further follow-up. Toxicity was recorded with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). Results: Myelodysplastic syndrome as a delayed adverse event was documented in 3 patients (1.4%). Relevant but reversible hematotoxicity (grade 3 or 4) occurred in 23 patients (11.3%) and 29 administrations (4.6%), with leukopenia in 2.7% and thrombocytopenia in 1.7%. The mean time to blood count recovery was 12 mo after the termination of PRRT (range, 3-22 mo). The only preexisting factor that contributed to hematotoxicity was initial cytopenia (P , 0.001). A high level of cumulative administered activity (.29.6 GBq) was associated with relevant leukopenia (P , 0.001). None of the patients with a history of splenectomy developed grade 3 or 4 hematotoxicity, and splenectomy was inversely associated with the incidence and degree of leukopenia (P 5 0.02) and thrombocytopenia (P 5 0.03) Conclusion: PRRT-induced myelosuppression is almost invariably reversible and rarely requires clinical measures. Administered activity and initial cytopenia are the only factors contributing to myelosuppression, whereas splenectomy may exert a protective effect. Pept ide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is a highly effective systemic treatment in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) (1-9). Bone marrow suppression is regarded as one of the most serious side effects after PRRT (10-13). Because of the lower energy and the shorter tissue penetration of the emitted b particles, treatment with 177 Lu-labeled peptides may result in a lower level of overall toxicity than PRRT with 90 Y-labeled peptides (14). However, there are only limited data regarding hematotoxicity after PRRT with 177 Lu-octreotate and contributing risk factors (2,15,16).The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence, severity, and reversibility of myelosuppression in a large cohort of patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic NETs treated with 177 Lu-octreotate. The impact of potential risk f...

Serious nephrotoxicity after PRRT with (177)Lu-octreotate is rare (1.3%). However, slight renal impairment (GFR loss >2 ml/min/m(2) per year) can frequently (43%) be detected by (99m)Tc-DTPA clearance assessments. Cumulative administered activity of (177)Lu-octreotate is not a major determinant of renal impairment in our study.

Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), a catheter-based liver-directed modality for treating primary and metastatic liver cancer, requires appropriate planning to maximize its therapeutic response and minimize its side effects. 99m Tc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) scanning should precede the therapy to detect any extrahepatic shunting to the lung or gastrointestinal tract. Our aim was to compare the ability of SPECT/CT with that of planar imaging and SPECT in the detection and localization of extrahepatic 99m Tc-MAA accumulation and to evaluate the impact of SPECT/CT on SIRT treatment planning and its added value to angiography in this setting. Methods: Ninety diagnostic hepatic angiograms with 99m Tc-MAA were obtained for 76 patients with different types of cancer. All images were reviewed retrospectively for extrahepatic MAA deposition in the following order: planar, non-attenuation-corrected SPECT, and SPECT/CT. Review of angiograms and follow-up of patients with abdominal shunting served as reference standards. Results: Extrahepatic accumulation was detected by planar imaging, SPECT, and SPECT/CT in 12%, 17%, and 42% of examinations, respectively. The sensitivity for detecting extrahepatic shunting with planar imaging, SPECT, and SPECT/CT was 32%, 41%, and 100%, respectively; specificity was 98%, 98%, and 93%, respectively. The respective positive predictive values were 92%, 93%, and 89%, and the respective negative predictive values were 71%, 73%, and 100%. The therapy plan was changed according to the results of planar imaging, SPECT, and SPECT/CT in 7.8%, 8.9%, and 29% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: In pre-SIRT planning, 99m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT is valuable for identifying extrahepatic visceral sites at risk for postradioembolization complications.

PRRT is well tolerated and very effective in advanced well-differentiated small intestinal (midgut) NET. A high disease control rate and long PFS can be achieved with this modality after failure of standard biotherapy with somatostatin analogues. Tumour functionality and high plasma CgA appear to be independent predictors of unfavourable patient outcome.

Response to PRRT is consistent over the PI range of ≤20% (G1 + G2). Contrary to preliminary previous suggestions, a PI of 15% or 20% should not preclude candidates from somatostatin receptor-targeted radiotherapy.

PRRT with (177)Lu-octreotate in the re-treatment setting is safe and effective in patients with metastatic GEP-NET.