Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Background Awake prone positioning (PP) has been used to avoid intubations in hypoxic COVID-19 patients, but there is limited evidence regarding its efficacy. Moreover, clinicians have little information to identify patients at high risk of intubation despite awake PP. We sought to assess the intubation rate among patients treated with awake PP in our Emergency Department (ED) and identify predictors of need for intubation. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted for known or suspected COVID-19 who were treated with awake PP in the ED. We excluded patients intubated in the ED. Our primary outcome was prevalence of intubation during initial hospitalization. Other outcomes were intubation within 48 h of admission and mortality. We performed classification and regression tree analysis to identify the variables most likely to predict the need for intubation. Results We included 97 patients; 44% required intubation and 21% were intubated within 48 h of admission. Respiratory oxygenation (ROX) index and P/F (partial pressure of oxygen / fraction of inspired oxygen) ratio measured 24 h after admission were the variables most likely to predict need for intubation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.82). Conclusions Among COVID-19 patients treated with awake PP in the ED prior to admission, ROX index and P/F ratio, particularly 24 h after admission, may be useful tools in identifying patients at high risk of intubation.

Background The impact of socioeconomic status (SES) has been described for screening and accessing treatment for colon cancer. However, little is known about the “downstream” effect in patients who receive guideline‐concordant treatment. This study assessed the impact of SES on cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) for stage III colon cancer patients. Methods The SEER Census Tract‐Level SES Dataset from 2004 to 2015 was used to identify stage III colon adenocarcinoma patients who received curative‐intent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The predictor variable was census tract SES. SES was analyzed as quintiles. The outcome variables were OR and CSS. Statistical analysis included chi square tests for association, Kaplan–Meier, Cox, Fine and Gray regression for survival analysis. Results In total, 27,222 patients met inclusion criteria. Lower SES was associated with younger age, Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity, Medicaid/uninsured, higher T stage, and lower grade tumors. CSS at the 25th percentile was 54 months for the lowest SES quintile and 80 for the highest. Median OS was 113 months for the lowest SES quintile and not reached for highest. The 5‐year CSS rate was 72.4% for the lowest SES quintile compared to 78.9% in the highest ( p < 0.001). The 5‐year OS rate was 66.5% for the lowest SES quintile and 74.6% in the highest ( p < 0.001). Conclusion This is the first study to evaluate CSS and OS in an incidence‐based cohort of stage III colon cancer patients using a granular, standardized measure of SES. Despite receipt of guideline‐based treatment, SES was associated with disparities in CSS and OS.

130 Background: Breast cancer (BC) screening is an integral part of cancer prevention. COVID-19 posed multiple obstacles on ensuring continuity of cancer care. The short and long-term outcomes of the pandemic on BC screening is unknown. The purpose of this study is to examine the challenges the pandemic has on mammogram completion using a granular measure of social economic deprivation: Area deprivation index (ADI). Methods: A Retrospective cohort study was conducted at an academic hospital system at the epicenter of COVID-19 pandemic comparing BC screening rates during the year of 2019 (pre-COVID19) and 2020 (COVID-19). For the year 2020, only charts between January-February and July-December were reviewed. March-June period was avoided as the USA declared a national emergency and the American Cancer Society recommended to temporarily pause cancer screening. The outcome variable was mammogram completion. The predictor variables were: COVID-19 period, race, insurance, age and ADI. ADI is a validated dataset that ranks census block groups based on socioeconomic deprivation (SED). Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables by receipt of mammography. A multivariate logistic regression was used for associations between mammogram completion and the predictor variables. Results: A total of 694 patients were deemed eligible for BC screening in the year of 2019 (394) and 2020 (300). During the follow up period, only 106 and 30 patients from the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 cohorts underwent BC screening, respectively. During the pandemic, 30/30 patients who completed their screening were African Americans and had a high SED. In a multivariable analysis, COVID-19 period is associated with 79% lower odds of mammogram completion (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.13, 0.35). ADI and race were not associated with higher screening rates. Medicaid status is associated with higher odds of mammogram completion (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.12, 3.47). Conclusions: COVID-19 caused significant disruption in BC screening. In an area with high SED and high COVID-19 infection rates, private insurance holders and white patients had low rates mammogram completion. One potential explanation is that these patients sought care elsewhere. [Table: see text]

240 Background: The rate of breast cancer among Black and White women is nearly equivalent but the death rate is 40% higher for Blacks. This disparity is often attributed to lower screening mammography rates in Black women. The effectiveness of text messages on increasing screening mammography among Black women is not well known. Importantly, the themes that are most effective at promoting behavioral changes in Black women’s breast cancer screening practices through text message interventions have not been explored. An integrated social-behavioral approach was used to identify themes associated with Black women’s response to two types of text messaging: reminder and educational texts. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in Metropolitan Baltimore with two focus groups among Black breast cancer survivors. Participants completed a demographic survey and indicated text messaging practices and preferences for future breast screening texts via survey. Participants provided feedback on a series of 17 educational and reminder text messages. Focus groups were digitally recorded and transcribed for analysis. Text message preferences were analyzed using a content analysis approach. Multiple themes were identified, discussed and recorded. Results: 17 participants had an average age of 60. All participants reported cell phone ownership and 82% of participants reported texting. 46% reported an interest in reminder text messages and 54% reported an interest in educational text messages. Four main themes were derived from participants’ responses the text message series: 1) access to cancer care surveillance, 2) social network support, 3) patient-centered approach, and 4) self-advocacy. Text messages that included themes of self-advocacy, social network support, and patient-centered approach generated positive responses and the text messages that included access to cancer care surveillance were perceived as demotivating. Educational text messages were perceived to be more motivating than reminder text messages. Conclusions: Breast cancer screening behaviors are affected by various demographic, social-behavioral, and socioeconomic factors. The findings from this study suggest that developing an educational text message content that incorporates social and behavioral themes focusing on the patient may be more beneficial to improve breast cancer screening rates in this population.