A reference set of utility values for T2DM and its complications in line with NICE requirements was identified. This research illustrates the challenges associated with systematically selecting utility data for economic evaluations.

This systematic review of literature and online reports critically appraised incidence and prevalence estimates of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) to identify the most accurate estimates. Medline® and Embase® databases were searched for articles published between 1 January 2003 and 31 August 2020. Studies were grouped according to whether they were registries (population-based estimates), clinical databases (hospital-based estimates) or claims/administrative databases. Registries were classified into systematic and non-systematic registries, according to whether every national centre participated. Of 7,309 publications identified, 5,414 were screened after removal of duplicates and 33 were included. Inclusion was based on study type, availability of a clear numerator (diagnosed population) and a population- or hospital-based denominator, or all primary data required to calculate estimates. Only the most recent publication from a database was included. Most studies were based on European data and very few included children. In adults, the range of estimates per million was approximately 20-fold for PAH incidence (1.5–32) and prevalence (12.4–268) and of similar magnitude for CTEPH incidence (0.9–39) and prevalence (14.5–144). Recent (≤5 years) national systematic registry data from centralised healthcare systems provided the following ranges in adult estimates per million: approximately 5.8 for PAH incidence, 47.6–54.7 for PAH prevalence, 3.1–6.0 for CTEPH incidence and 25.8–38.4 for CTEPH prevalence. These estimates were considered the most reliable and consistent for the scientific community to plan for resource allocation and improve detection rates.

At the prices investigated, the cost per QALY gained for EQW when compared with insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes in the UK setting, was within the range normally considered cost effective by NICE. Cost effectiveness in practice will depend on the final price of EQW and the extent to which benefits observed in short-term randomised trials are replicated in long-term use.

Background: The clinical and economic burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is poorly understood outside the United States. This retrospective database study describes the characteristics of patients with PAH in England, including their healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and associated costs. Methods: Data from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2018 were obtained from the National Health Service (NHS) Digital Hospital Episode Statistics database, which provides full coverage of patient events occurring in NHS England hospitals. An adult patient cohort was defined using an algorithm incorporating pulmonary hypertension (PH) diagnosis codes, PAH-associated procedures, PH specialist centre visits and PAH-specific medications. HCRU included inpatient admissions, outpatient visits and Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances. Associated costs, calculated using national tariffs inflation-adjusted to 2017, did not include PAH-specific drugs on the High Cost Drugs list. Results: The analysis cohort included 2527 patients (68.4% female; 63.6% aged ⩾50 years). Mean annual HCRU rates ranged from 2.9 to 3.2 for admissions (21–25% of patients had ⩾5 admissions), 9.4–10.3 for outpatient visits and 0.8–0.9 for A&E attendances. Costs from 2013 to 2017 totalled £43.2M (£33.9M admissions, £8.3M outpatient visits and £0.9M A&E attendances). From 2013 to 2017, mean cost per patient decreased 13% (from £4400 to £3833) for admissions and 13% (from £1031 to £896) for outpatient visits, but increased 52% (from £81 to £123) for A&E attendances. Conclusion: PAH incurs a heavy economic burden on a per-patient basis, highlighting the need for improved treatment strategies able to reduce disease progression and hospitalisations. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

BackgroundPulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is a chronic rare disease that can lead to serious cardiovascular problems and death. Additional treatments that increase effectiveness, that are safe and with a convenient administration that improve outcomes and quality of life for patients are needed. The aim of this study was to assess the value contribution of the new, oral prostacyclin receptor agonist, selexipag, for PAH treatment in Spain through reflective Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodology.MethodsA comprehensive literature review was performed to develop an evidence matrix, composed of twelve quantitative criteria and four contextual criteria, based on an EVIDEM MCDA framework adapted to orphan drugs evaluation by the Spanish region of Catalonia. Quantitative performance scores, qualitative impact of contextual criteria and individual reflections from stakeholders were collected for each MCDA framework criteria. The value contribution of selexipag to PAH treatment compared to inhaled iloprost was calculated.ResultsOral selexipag for PAH treatment was considered as a treatment which adds value, compared to iloprost, in the following MCDA quantitative criteria: comparative efficacy, patient reported outcomes, preventive benefit, therapeutic benefit, other medical costs and other non-medical costs, without significant differences in safety profile but with a higher acquisition cost than inhaled iloprost.ConclusionsSelexipag was considered to provide value to PAH treatment. It was perceived as an intervention indicated for a severe rare disease with high unmet needs, supported by high quality clinical evidence. When compared to inhaled iloprost, oral selexipag has demonstrated improvements in efficacy and patient reported outcomes, with a similar safety profile and some additional costs.Reflective MCDA provided a standardised, transparent approach to evaluate multiple criteria relating to the overall value contribution of selexipag to PAH treatment facilitating decision-making.